|
Posted by RBM on October 15, 2006, 7:36 am
The old boiler will probably last another 100 years, but its efficiency is
probably so poor, that it would pay to have it replaced. Many plumbers won't
touch the asbestos covering, so you may have to have a special company
remove it first, which is not the big deal it used to be. While you don't
need to do this immediately, changing it will ultimately be the most cost
effective thing to do
> Hi. I am in the market for a house in Western Massachusetts. I have a
> really nice house in mind, but one of the things that scares me is the
> boiler. The house is about 100 years old and the boiler looks
> original. It is big and ball-shaped and covered in asbestos. Seller
> says there has been no problems with the boiler and they used
> relatively little oil (it is oil fired) to heat the house last year
> (about 900 gallons of oil for the season for a 2200 sq feet house in
> New England). I am not sure what to do. Should i get rid of the
> boiler right away or just keep using it? I need to figure out what
> kind of an offer to put on the house and this boiler issue is really
> confusing me. The question is: is it ok to assume this boiler will
> last for a while or will I have to replace it pretty much before moving
> in? The rest of the house is in great shape and is well-maintained.
> Actually, the boiler is also well-maintained and is fully functional.
> Help!
>
>
> --
> Vladimir
>
|