|
Posted by on November 23, 2006, 12:10 pm
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:03:54 -0500, tnom@mucks.net wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:54:16 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
>wrote:
>
>>
>>>I need recommendation for good, reliable, basic cordless phone!
>>
>>Radio Shack 43-3908 -- battery life is excellent. Headset is a bit fragile, so
>>handle it carefully.
>
>43-3908 is a typical ni-cad battery. The same battery I just purchased
>from Radio Shack. The same battery that would not hold a charge. The
>same battery that I misplaced the receipt for. The same battery that
>was most likely was a returned battery that was repackaged by a Radio
>Shack employee because their packaging is not sealed.
>
>
>http://www.radioshack.com/search/index.jsp?kwCatId=&kw=43-3908&origkw=43-3908
Sorry the above link is mis-leading/incorrect however the actual
43-3908 phone uses a typical 3.6volt ni-cad (23-9037) that is no
better than other ni-cads.
|