If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by Kadaitcha Man on April 22, 2007, 4:48 am
nauseating flip-flop. Ye reproved:
show/hide quoted text
> Nelson Muntz wrote:
>> alarman wrote:
>>> Nelson Muntz wrote:
>>>> alarman wrote:
>>>>> Nelson Muntz wrote:
>>>>>> Crash Gordon wrote:
>>>>>>> So...just tell him you don't provide tamper service for a local
>>>>>>> account...it's GONNA be a pita for you anyway you know that
>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>> Yeah.. I was going to charge $100 every time I gotta replace one.
>>>>> $100 for the service call maybe. Plus parts and labor. Good luck.
>>>>> js
>>>> The part is $25. I can drive to the site in 15 minutes. He just
>>>> called me.
>>>> I told him I'll swap the panel for $100.
>>> You have a lot to learn, bud.
>> I know.. That's what I've been asking for.
> Jack, I need your help. I jumped into this without any management
> experience. Frank, Bob W, Jim R., and Allan helped with establishing
> my business. I really appreciated all their efforts.. But the bottom
> line is I am a technician. I know all about the technical side, but
> have no clue about the management side. Tom even offered his help
> which was greatly appreciated. I had no clue about the donotcall.gov
> stuff.
> I will admit it.. I am not effective as a manager. I could use any
> help you proprietors are willing to offer.
> my email is: alarmpro@gmail.com if you would prefer to send advice
> other than Usenet.
You are not even effective as a human being, Graham.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een afgezabberde afgerukte wc-pot.
|
|
Posted by Nelson Muntz on April 22, 2007, 12:07 pm
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>You are not even effective as a human being, Graham.
Say's the idiot that can't find a girlfriend on his own continent,
then horribly screws up when he manages to find someone to manipulate
(for a few months) 8000 miles away.
Yeah- tell me more about how effective you are, Ricky.
|
|
Posted by Rhonda Lea Kirk on April 22, 2007, 1:31 pm
show/hide quoted text
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> You are not even effective as a human being, Graham.
> Say's the idiot that can't find a girlfriend on his own continent,
> then horribly screws up when he manages to find someone to manipulate
> (for a few months) 8000 miles away.
How many times do you need to be told that your issue with Kadaitcha Man
has nothing to do with me?
The fact that you continue to bring me into it certainly gives lie to
your claim of concern for my welfare.
show/hide quoted text
> Yeah- tell me more about how effective you are, Ricky.
He's got major IQ points on you, and he's neither a fucking racist nor a
net abuser.
That puts him well ahead of you from the starting gate.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
You can discover what your enemy fears most by
observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
|
|
Posted by Kadaitcha Man on April 22, 2007, 8:13 pm
darkness. Ye repeated:
show/hide quoted text
> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>> You are not even effective as a human being, Graham.
>>> Say's the idiot that can't find a girlfriend on his own continent,
>>> then horribly screws up when he manages to find someone to
>>> manipulate (for a few months) 8000 miles away.
>> How many times do you need to be told that your issue with Kadaitcha
>> Man has nothing to do with me?
> Let me get this right.. His failure to do right by you is off-limits,
> yes? So all of his net-trolling and manipulation had nothing to do
> with you getting involved with him in the first place?
Don't look now but there go all your previous assertions about not using
Rhonda as an excuse to get to me, netk0oK.
show/hide quoted text
> You didn't even bother to ask WHY we had the problem in the first
> place. My sneaky deed was NOT unprovoked - far from it.
Oops! You need to be told that the word sneaky is not a suitable euphemism
for wire fraud criminal activity.
HTH
show/hide quoted text
>> The fact that you continue to bring me into it certainly gives lie to
>> your claim of concern for my welfare.
> If that's what you think, I can't help it.
Don't look now, netK0oK but you seem to be sinking, fast.
show/hide quoted text
> My concern is genuine, but fading fast.
Watch...
show/hide quoted text
> I now see why there may be credence in the horrible
> nickname you received.
Your concern is so genuine and fading so fast that it dissolved into a flame
in the very next sentence.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
show/hide quoted text
> Why do you think I didn't jump on the offer to
> get those Tastycakes? It was because I didn't want to send you my
> home address.
BWAHAHAHAHA! Your hindisgh is so perfect you must have eyes in your
arsehole.
show/hide quoted text
>>> Yeah- tell me more about how effective you are, Ricky.
>> He's got major IQ points on you, and he's neither a fucking racist
>> nor a net abuser.
> He's a fucking lunatic, and the worst net-abuser I've ever witnessed.
Really?
show/hide quoted text
> I'm not racist either
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Calling Mexicans "wetbacks", their sick children
"Pedro's kids", and calling black-skinned women "nappy-headed-ho's" is not
racist?
show/hide quoted text
> - my prediction in the rant was true after all,
> wasn't it? Take off those rose-colored glasses.
>> That puts him well ahead of you from the starting gate.
> Uh-huh.. You two deserve each other.
Well, no, that's not true. Firstly, and far less importantly, my defence of
myself does not require any measure of deserving on anyone else's part; none
whatsoever. The evidence for the inherent truth in that statement is seen in
the fact that I'm now beating you up for your statement there.
If I felt any third party whom you are attacking were deserving in any way
whatsoever then I'd just sit back and let you go for it, and I wouldn't bat
an eyelid; indeed perhaps I'd be right behind you, slurping at you by
thanking you for your understanding, encouragement and support. Perhaps you
haven't noticed that I'm not doing that.
Secondly, and vitally, some, far too many, adults have had horrible crimes
perpetrated upon them in their childhood at the hands of grossly sick mental
freaks of nature. Since the child becomes the adult, whatever happened to
the child is, in one way or another, part and parcel of the package that is
the adult, no matter how well the adult deals with any supposed awful
childhood incident. Your fuckwitted netk0oK statement then necessarily
entails that your targets are also deserving of every disgraceful thing that
may have been meted out to them as children.
I am certain that you will not understand any of that at all since you are
clearly a sociopath. I am also certain that you will not ever comprehend the
notion that you have tacitly put your tawdry seal of approval on child rape,
child bashing, child prostitution, child slave labour, and any and all other
subhuman acts of exploitation and abuse perpetrated on children the world
over who are fortunate to live long enough to become adults.
Only a complete and utterly fucked in the head psychopath and sociopath,
that would be you, would require that any adult deserved the hideous
treatment they may have received but neither asked for nor deserved as a
child.
You are one utterly sick fuck, Graham teh k0oK. I am going to tear your
fucked up psyche apart and piss into your empty cranium; and I make that as
a solemn promise to you.
You can make your impending netDE4th less painful for yourself by shutting
the fuck right up about other people and leaving anything to do with them
right out of your argument with me.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
Nu vind ik je een tepeltrekkende platgeneukte mormel.
|
|
Posted by Kadaitcha Man on April 22, 2007, 8:13 pm
darkness. Ye repeated:
show/hide quoted text
> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>> You are not even effective as a human being, Graham.
>>> Say's the idiot that can't find a girlfriend on his own continent,
>>> then horribly screws up when he manages to find someone to
>>> manipulate (for a few months) 8000 miles away.
>> How many times do you need to be told that your issue with Kadaitcha
>> Man has nothing to do with me?
> Let me get this right.. His failure to do right by you is off-limits,
> yes? So all of his net-trolling and manipulation had nothing to do
> with you getting involved with him in the first place?
Don't look now but there go all your previous assertions about not using
Rhonda as an excuse to get to me, netk0oK.
show/hide quoted text
> You didn't even bother to ask WHY we had the problem in the first
> place. My sneaky deed was NOT unprovoked - far from it.
Oops! You need to be told that the word sneaky is not a suitable euphemism
for wire fraud criminal activity.
HTH
show/hide quoted text
>> The fact that you continue to bring me into it certainly gives lie to
>> your claim of concern for my welfare.
> If that's what you think, I can't help it.
Don't look now, netK0oK but you seem to be sinking, fast.
show/hide quoted text
> My concern is genuine, but fading fast.
Watch...
show/hide quoted text
> I now see why there may be credence in the horrible
> nickname you received.
Your concern is so genuine and fading so fast that it dissolved into a flame
in the very next sentence.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
show/hide quoted text
> Why do you think I didn't jump on the offer to
> get those Tastycakes? It was because I didn't want to send you my
> home address.
BWAHAHAHAHA! Your hindisgh is so perfect you must have eyes in your
arsehole.
show/hide quoted text
>>> Yeah- tell me more about how effective you are, Ricky.
>> He's got major IQ points on you, and he's neither a fucking racist
>> nor a net abuser.
> He's a fucking lunatic, and the worst net-abuser I've ever witnessed.
Really?
show/hide quoted text
> I'm not racist either
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Calling Mexicans "wetbacks", their sick children
"Pedro's kids", and calling black-skinned women "nappy-headed-ho's" is not
racist?
show/hide quoted text
> - my prediction in the rant was true after all,
> wasn't it? Take off those rose-colored glasses.
>> That puts him well ahead of you from the starting gate.
> Uh-huh.. You two deserve each other.
Well, no, that's not true. Firstly, and far less importantly, my defence of
myself does not require any measure of deserving on anyone else's part; none
whatsoever. The evidence for the inherent truth in that statement is seen in
the fact that I'm now beating you up for your statement there.
If I felt any third party whom you are attacking were deserving in any way
whatsoever then I'd just sit back and let you go for it, and I wouldn't bat
an eyelid; indeed perhaps I'd be right behind you, slurping at you by
thanking you for your understanding, encouragement and support. Perhaps you
haven't noticed that I'm not doing that.
Secondly, and vitally, some, far too many, adults have had horrible crimes
perpetrated upon them in their childhood at the hands of grossly sick mental
freaks of nature. Since the child becomes the adult, whatever happened to
the child is, in one way or another, part and parcel of the package that is
the adult, no matter how well the adult deals with any supposed awful
childhood incident. Your fuckwitted netk0oK statement then necessarily
entails that your targets are also deserving of every disgraceful thing that
may have been meted out to them as children.
I am certain that you will not understand any of that at all since you are
clearly a sociopath. I am also certain that you will not ever comprehend the
notion that you have tacitly put your tawdry seal of approval on child rape,
child bashing, child prostitution, child slave labour, and any and all other
subhuman acts of exploitation and abuse perpetrated on children the world
over who are fortunate to live long enough to become adults.
Only a complete and utterly fucked in the head psychopath and sociopath,
that would be you, would require that any adult deserved the hideous
treatment they may have received but neither asked for nor deserved as a
child.
You are one utterly sick fuck, Graham teh k0oK. I am going to tear your
fucked up psyche apart and piss into your empty cranium; and I make that as
a solemn promise to you.
You can make your impending netDE4th less painful for yourself by shutting
the fuck right up about other people and leaving anything to do with them
right out of your argument with me.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
Nu vind ik je een tepeltrekkende platgeneukte mormel.
|
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: Dammit.. How to get 2 zones and power from a 4-conductor | April 22, 2007, 5:18 am |
| Graham teh Kook -> RACIST Fuckhead alert #2 (Re: OT: capitation (was Re: Occupancy and Security PIR - Suggestions?)) | April 22, 2007, 4:58 am |
| Power failure | February 20, 2010, 12:59 pm |
| Los Angeles power failure | September 12, 2005, 9:00 pm |
| Partial power failure | December 1, 2008, 5:27 pm |
| Sump Pump , whats my best solution for power failure | October 8, 2005, 6:28 pm |
| GE fridge on-door water dispenser power failure | January 10, 2007, 8:49 pm |
| Recommend cordless phone that will work during power failure? | April 28, 2009, 4:40 pm |
| Re: Early nomination for kook of the year... | December 17, 2006, 1:51 pm |
| Dammit! (water softener) | July 13, 2007, 2:56 am |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>> alarman wrote:
>>> Nelson Muntz wrote:
>>>> alarman wrote:
>>>>> Nelson Muntz wrote:
>>>>>> Crash Gordon wrote:
>>>>>>> So...just tell him you don't provide tamper service for a local
>>>>>>> account...it's GONNA be a pita for you anyway you know that
>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>> Yeah.. I was going to charge $100 every time I gotta replace one.
>>>>> $100 for the service call maybe. Plus parts and labor. Good luck.
>>>>> js
>>>> The part is $25. I can drive to the site in 15 minutes. He just
>>>> called me.
>>>> I told him I'll swap the panel for $100.
>>> You have a lot to learn, bud.
>> I know.. That's what I've been asking for.
> Jack, I need your help. I jumped into this without any management
> experience. Frank, Bob W, Jim R., and Allan helped with establishing
> my business. I really appreciated all their efforts.. But the bottom
> line is I am a technician. I know all about the technical side, but
> have no clue about the management side. Tom even offered his help
> which was greatly appreciated. I had no clue about the donotcall.gov
> stuff.
> I will admit it.. I am not effective as a manager. I could use any
> help you proprietors are willing to offer.
> my email is: alarmpro@gmail.com if you would prefer to send advice
> other than Usenet.