Home Page link

Electrical

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 3 of 3       << first < 1 2 3 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Electrical J.C. 02-06-2007
|--> Re: Electrical hallerb@aol.com02-06-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by on February 8, 2007, 1:50 am


On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:18:00 -0500, "RBM" <rbm2(remove
this)@optonline.net> wrote:

>Utility companies, at least in NY do not use NEC standards, period
>
>

"NESC" was not a typo. It is the code utilities use.
Different than NEC


>
>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:42:07 -0500, "RBM" <rbm2(remove
>> this)@optonline.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Just to add to what Doug has already said: While the service conductors
>>>that
>>>you own, must meet NEC standards, it's common for utility company owned
>>>conductors to be much smaller, so it's not unusual to see thing like 1/0
>>>aluminum connected to a 400 amp residential service
>>>
>>
>> This always happens in overhead service since they use the free air
>> rule in the NESC but underground service laterals are usually going to
>> follow 310.15(B)(6).
>


Posted by RBM on February 8, 2007, 7:25 am


Got ya, I'm not familiar with their rules. Con Edison of NY has their
engineers decide if the size of a lateral is adequate for a service upgrade,
unless of course when the customer owns the lateral, then it has to meet
NEC, but once I connected a 200 amp service to #2 copper and once to #6,
which was in a wooden duct from the street to the house



> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:18:00 -0500, "RBM" <rbm2(remove
> this)@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>>Utility companies, at least in NY do not use NEC standards, period
>>
>>
>
> "NESC" was not a typo. It is the code utilities use.
> Different than NEC
>
>
>>
>>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:42:07 -0500, "RBM" <rbm2(remove
>>> this)@optonline.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Just to add to what Doug has already said: While the service conductors
>>>>that
>>>>you own, must meet NEC standards, it's common for utility company owned
>>>>conductors to be much smaller, so it's not unusual to see thing like 1/0
>>>>aluminum connected to a 400 amp residential service
>>>>
>>>
>>> This always happens in overhead service since they use the free air
>>> rule in the NESC but underground service laterals are usually going to
>>> follow 310.15(B)(6).
>>
>



Posted by Tom Horne, Electrician on February 9, 2007, 12:25 am


RBM wrote:
> Utility companies, at least in NY do not use NEC standards, period
>
>
>
>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:42:07 -0500, "RBM" <rbm2(remove
>> this)@optonline.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Just to add to what Doug has already said: While the service conductors
>>> that
>>> you own, must meet NEC standards, it's common for utility company owned
>>> conductors to be much smaller, so it's not unusual to see thing like 1/0
>>> aluminum connected to a 400 amp residential service
>>>
>> This always happens in overhead service since they use the free air
>> rule in the NESC but underground service laterals are usually going to
>> follow 310.15(B)(6).
>
>

You need to read more carefully. The poster was referring to the
National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) which is the standard that the
nations utility regulatory bodies use in evaluating the safety of public
electrical utility installations.
--
Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous
for general use." Thomas Alva Edison

Page 3 of 3       << first < 1 2 3
Similar ThreadsPosted
need some electrical help February 12, 2006, 7:55 pm
electrical May 17, 2006, 4:51 pm
Electrical June 19, 2006, 5:28 pm
electrical September 4, 2006, 5:00 pm
Electrical - What the fuc............................ November 18, 2006, 6:31 am
electrical ? December 6, 2006, 7:09 pm
electrical January 10, 2007, 12:18 am
Need some electrical know-how February 11, 2008, 5:20 pm
Where to put the electrical box. June 9, 2008, 1:07 pm
electrical short February 12, 2005, 6:57 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap