Home Page link

Electrical Code question:"accessibility"

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 1 of 3       1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Electrical Code question:"accessibility" Doug Miller 08-14-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Doug Miller on August 14, 2008, 5:39 pm


In the course of remodeling my bathroom, I just discovered that the
knucklehead who remodeled it the last time, some 25 or 30 years ago, made a
splice inside the wall, behind the sink backsplash -- but not, unfortunately,
in a junction box.

In the wall behind the sink cabinet are two stick-built medicine cabinets with
mirrored doors that slide in tracks. Between the two is another large mirror,
that also slides (although with some difficulty). There's sufficient space
behind the central mirror to mount a proper junction box: see photo at
http://www.milmac.com/bathroom.jpg
showing what it looks like with the central mirror slid all the way to the
left.

And it seems to me that doing so *does* comply with at least the *letter*
of the NEC requirements for accessibility, if not the spirit:

"Boxes ... shall be installed so that the wiring contained in them can be
rendered accessible without REMOVING any part of the building ..." [2005
and 2008 NEC, Art. 314.29 (emphasis added)]

Comments, please.

Posted by RBM on August 14, 2008, 6:36 pm



> In the course of remodeling my bathroom, I just discovered that the
> knucklehead who remodeled it the last time, some 25 or 30 years ago, made
> a
> splice inside the wall, behind the sink backsplash -- but not,
> unfortunately,
> in a junction box.
>
> In the wall behind the sink cabinet are two stick-built medicine cabinets
> with
> mirrored doors that slide in tracks. Between the two is another large
> mirror,
> that also slides (although with some difficulty). There's sufficient space
> behind the central mirror to mount a proper junction box: see photo at
> http://www.milmac.com/bathroom.jpg
> showing what it looks like with the central mirror slid all the way to the
> left.
>
> And it seems to me that doing so *does* comply with at least the *letter*
> of the NEC requirements for accessibility, if not the spirit:
>
> "Boxes ... shall be installed so that the wiring contained in them can be
> rendered accessible without REMOVING any part of the building ..." [2005
> and 2008 NEC, Art. 314.29 (emphasis added)]
>
> Comments, please.

Looks easy to access to me. Certainly more easily accessible than the
junction boxes of some recessed fixtures



Posted by Doug Miller on August 14, 2008, 7:46 pm


>
>> In the course of remodeling my bathroom, I just discovered that the
>> knucklehead who remodeled it the last time, some 25 or 30 years ago, made
>> a splice inside the wall, behind the sink backsplash -- but not,
>> unfortunately, in a junction box.
>>
>> In the wall behind the sink cabinet are two stick-built medicine cabinets with
>> mirrored doors that slide in tracks. Between the two is another large mirror,
>> that also slides (although with some difficulty). There's sufficient space
>> behind the central mirror to mount a proper junction box: see photo at
>> http://www.milmac.com/bathroom.jpg
>> showing what it looks like with the central mirror slid all the way to the
>> left.
>>
>> And it seems to me that doing so *does* comply with at least the *letter*
>> of the NEC requirements for accessibility, if not the spirit:
>>
>> "Boxes ... shall be installed so that the wiring contained in them can be
>> rendered accessible without REMOVING any part of the building ..." [2005
>> and 2008 NEC, Art. 314.29 (emphasis added)]
>>
>> Comments, please.
>
>Looks easy to access to me. Certainly more easily accessible than the
>junction boxes of some recessed fixtures
>

LOL - hadn't thought about it that way, but you're quite right. Thanks. I
think that's probably the route I'll go, then, as the only other reasonable
alternative I've come up with is to cut a hole in the new backsplash and mount
a GFCI receptacle there... bleah.

Posted by RBM on August 14, 2008, 8:19 pm



> wrote:
>>
>>> In the course of remodeling my bathroom, I just discovered that the
>>> knucklehead who remodeled it the last time, some 25 or 30 years ago,
>>> made
>>> a splice inside the wall, behind the sink backsplash -- but not,
>>> unfortunately, in a junction box.
>>>
>>> In the wall behind the sink cabinet are two stick-built medicine
>>> cabinets with
>>> mirrored doors that slide in tracks. Between the two is another large
>>> mirror,
>>> that also slides (although with some difficulty). There's sufficient
>>> space
>>> behind the central mirror to mount a proper junction box: see photo at
>>> http://www.milmac.com/bathroom.jpg
>>> showing what it looks like with the central mirror slid all the way to
>>> the
>>> left.
>>>
>>> And it seems to me that doing so *does* comply with at least the
>>> *letter*
>>> of the NEC requirements for accessibility, if not the spirit:
>>>
>>> "Boxes ... shall be installed so that the wiring contained in them can
>>> be
>>> rendered accessible without REMOVING any part of the building ..." [2005
>>> and 2008 NEC, Art. 314.29 (emphasis added)]
>>>
>>> Comments, please.
>>
>>Looks easy to access to me. Certainly more easily accessible than the
>>junction boxes of some recessed fixtures
>>
>
> LOL - hadn't thought about it that way, but you're quite right. Thanks. I
> think that's probably the route I'll go, then, as the only other
> reasonable
> alternative I've come up with is to cut a hole in the new backsplash and
> mount
> a GFCI receptacle there... bleah.

Don't muck up your bathroom. Go with the hidden box. Terms like "accessible"
crack me up. Every time I have to force my hand through a Lightolier 2002
razor sharp recessed frame to access the "accessible" junction box, to
replace a defective thermal cutout, I question that definition.



Posted by aemeijers on August 14, 2008, 9:15 pm


RBM wrote:
>> wrote:
>>>> In the course of remodeling my bathroom, I just discovered that the
>>>> knucklehead who remodeled it the last time, some 25 or 30 years ago,
>>>> made
>>>> a splice inside the wall, behind the sink backsplash -- but not,
>>>> unfortunately, in a junction box.
>>>>
>>>> In the wall behind the sink cabinet are two stick-built medicine
>>>> cabinets with
>>>> mirrored doors that slide in tracks. Between the two is another large
>>>> mirror,
>>>> that also slides (although with some difficulty). There's sufficient
>>>> space
>>>> behind the central mirror to mount a proper junction box: see photo at
>>>> http://www.milmac.com/bathroom.jpg
>>>> showing what it looks like with the central mirror slid all the way to
>>>> the
>>>> left.
>>>>
>>>> And it seems to me that doing so *does* comply with at least the
>>>> *letter*
>>>> of the NEC requirements for accessibility, if not the spirit:
>>>>
>>>> "Boxes ... shall be installed so that the wiring contained in them can
>>>> be
>>>> rendered accessible without REMOVING any part of the building ..." [2005
>>>> and 2008 NEC, Art. 314.29 (emphasis added)]
>>>>
>>>> Comments, please.
>>> Looks easy to access to me. Certainly more easily accessible than the
>>> junction boxes of some recessed fixtures
>>>
>> LOL - hadn't thought about it that way, but you're quite right. Thanks. I
>> think that's probably the route I'll go, then, as the only other
>> reasonable
>> alternative I've come up with is to cut a hole in the new backsplash and
>> mount
>> a GFCI receptacle there... bleah.
>
> Don't muck up your bathroom. Go with the hidden box. Terms like "accessible"
> crack me up. Every time I have to force my hand through a Lightolier 2002
> razor sharp recessed frame to access the "accessible" junction box, to
> replace a defective thermal cutout, I question that definition.
>
>
I had the same situation as OP, a floating butt splice in the wall,
feeding the counter convenience outlet, behind a replacement medicine
cabinet. Abandon the run and fish a new wire to an accessible location,
preferably directly from the power source to a GFCI outlet, or if it is
a switched feed, to the load fixtures. From his description, I bet the
existing run fed the original medicine cabinet light/outlet.

Is this above a basement? Would a new junction in basement ceiling work
to feed the runs? Or maybe a box in the dry side of the vanity? I don't
understand the current cabinet setup- sliding glass panels over a wall
cavity? Did he recycle some old store display case bits? Seems like that
would be drafty, or invite condensation in the wall space, and paint
problems over that cavity in the room behind it. As long as bathroom is
messed up anyway, I would spend the bucks to change that situation.
Those wires that drop down behind the vanity- do they feed lights in the
2 cabinets on either side, or what? They don't look real legal either.

--
aem sends...

Page 1 of 3       1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Electrical code question... May 13, 2007, 9:52 pm
Electrical code question September 1, 2007, 2:23 pm
Electrical code question December 12, 2007, 11:44 am
electrical code question December 10, 2008, 12:00 pm
Electrical Code Question (Canada) January 28, 2006, 4:49 pm
Electrical Code Question - Buried wire December 18, 2006, 8:26 pm
electrical code Q July 13, 2005, 2:50 pm
Is This The Best Electrical Code Book To Have? February 11, 2005, 1:23 am
Three electrical code questions December 3, 2008, 12:12 am
Floating Electrical Box- Is it Code Compliant ? October 25, 2005, 8:50 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap