Home Page link

Electrician hourly rates

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 1 of 5       1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Electrician hourly rates ET1742 07-05-2006
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by ET1742 on July 5, 2006, 5:13 pm
I am trying to get an idea of what is a "normal" hourly rate for an
electrician. My reason for asking is that I would like to find an
electrician that I can use who would bill me "time and materials" -- that
is, "X" amount per hour plus the cost of materials. That way, when I have
electrical work that needs to be done, I can skip all of the back and forth
let-me-give-you-an-estimate for each and every job. I can have the company
send someone out and know they can just do the work and bill me by the hour
plus materials.

For example, if an electrical contracting company said our charge is $120
for the first hour, then $80 for each hour after that, plus the cost of
materials, I would be fine with that.

Today, I needed a simple job done -- replace a 30-foot length of 220V 10/3
wire that runs from the main panel box to the cut-off box outside for the AC
condenser unit. It is all easily accessible in a high ceiling basement and
the line needs to go through a plain cinder block wall. The line needs to
be replaced because the outside insulation on the portion that is on the
outside of the house is coming off almost completely leaving the black and
white insulated wires exposed to the elements. I thought the person coming
out would just do the work and bill me for his time and materials. Instead,
he insisted on preparing a whole work order which I agreed to, and then he
will come back tomorrow and do the work. The cost is $395 based on two
hours of work at $175/hour (his time estimate), plus materials.

I agreed to have it done simply because I need it done, and because it is
for a house I own that others live in so I want it done by a licensed
electrician rather than do it myself.

But that started me wondering -- if I have a lot of other electrical work
that I want done (which I do) in two other houses that I own, do I want to
be paying $175 and hour for an electrician? I don't know what the company
is paying it's worker, but I'm guessing less than $50 per hour. Throw
another $25 per hour on for benefits, down time, or whatever and that still
leaves the company making $100 an hour to cover it's overhead, insurance,
etc.

I am definitely not cheap, so it's not about me wanting to nickel and dime
anyone. But isn't $175 an hour for an electrician over the top?

I live in New Jersey.



Posted by EXT on July 5, 2006, 5:44 pm
The old rule of thumb is a worker must make for the company the same income
he is making for himself. Of course there are all types of variations added
to this including supply and demand and "the going rate".

If the electrician earns $50.00 per hour, he must generate $50.00 for the
company. Benefits will vary but can run from 35% to 50% for some unionized
jobs. this will add $25.00. So far it costs $125.00. Then there is the
overhead of the company such as insurance, vehicles, taxes office/warehouse
space, etc. etc., including accountants, office staff, and even your
quotation. He has to make a quotation as he may not have the right tools
and/or supplies on hand, nor the timeframe available without looking at the
job. Plus he will have to go to the supplier to get the needed items, even
if he has them in stock in the office, they have to be replaced. This all
costs money. $175.00 may seem high, it may also be the "going rate" in your
area, but it is surprising how fast it adds up when you are running a
business.

You may be able to strike a "flat rate" type of deal when you have worked up
a relationship with a company, where they trust your assessment of the job
enough to send a man out on your say-so, but as a first-time customer, they
will not be eager unless they have no work on hand.

>I am trying to get an idea of what is a "normal" hourly rate for an
>electrician. My reason for asking is that I would like to find an
>electrician that I can use who would bill me "time and materials" -- that
>is, "X" amount per hour plus the cost of materials. That way, when I have
>electrical work that needs to be done, I can skip all of the back and forth
>let-me-give-you-an-estimate for each and every job. I can have the company
>send someone out and know they can just do the work and bill me by the hour
>plus materials.
>
> For example, if an electrical contracting company said our charge is $120
> for the first hour, then $80 for each hour after that, plus the cost of
> materials, I would be fine with that.
>
> Today, I needed a simple job done -- replace a 30-foot length of 220V 10/3
> wire that runs from the main panel box to the cut-off box outside for the
> AC condenser unit. It is all easily accessible in a high ceiling basement
> and the line needs to go through a plain cinder block wall. The line
> needs to be replaced because the outside insulation on the portion that is
> on the outside of the house is coming off almost completely leaving the
> black and white insulated wires exposed to the elements. I thought the
> person coming out would just do the work and bill me for his time and
> materials. Instead, he insisted on preparing a whole work order which I
> agreed to, and then he will come back tomorrow and do the work. The cost
> is $395 based on two hours of work at $175/hour (his time estimate), plus
> materials.
>
> I agreed to have it done simply because I need it done, and because it is
> for a house I own that others live in so I want it done by a licensed
> electrician rather than do it myself.
>
> But that started me wondering -- if I have a lot of other electrical work
> that I want done (which I do) in two other houses that I own, do I want to
> be paying $175 and hour for an electrician? I don't know what the company
> is paying it's worker, but I'm guessing less than $50 per hour. Throw
> another $25 per hour on for benefits, down time, or whatever and that
> still leaves the company making $100 an hour to cover it's overhead,
> insurance, etc.
>
> I am definitely not cheap, so it's not about me wanting to nickel and dime
> anyone. But isn't $175 an hour for an electrician over the top?
>
> I live in New Jersey.
>



Posted by ET1742 on July 5, 2006, 10:59 pm
Thanks for your response. I do understand what you are saying about what it
really costs to operate a business. The person who came out to do the work
was about 23-25 years old. My guess is that he gets paid a lot less than
$50 per hour since I doubt that he makes $100,000 a year. But I picked $50
per hour just to be on the high side.

I have used plumbing companies in the past and they charged between $60 and
$90 per hour plus parts, so when I heard $175 per hour it just struck me as
high.

I'll definitely check around in my area and maybe I'll find that $175 an
hour is not unusual.

> The old rule of thumb is a worker must make for the company the same
> income he is making for himself. Of course there are all types of
> variations added to this including supply and demand and "the going rate".
>
> If the electrician earns $50.00 per hour, he must generate $50.00 for the
> company. Benefits will vary but can run from 35% to 50% for some unionized
> jobs. this will add $25.00. So far it costs $125.00. Then there is the
> overhead of the company such as insurance, vehicles, taxes
> office/warehouse space, etc. etc., including accountants, office staff,
> and even your quotation. He has to make a quotation as he may not have the
> right tools and/or supplies on hand, nor the timeframe available without
> looking at the job. Plus he will have to go to the supplier to get the
> needed items, even if he has them in stock in the office, they have to be
> replaced. This all costs money. $175.00 may seem high, it may also be the
> "going rate" in your area, but it is surprising how fast it adds up when
> you are running a business.
>
> You may be able to strike a "flat rate" type of deal when you have worked
> up a relationship with a company, where they trust your assessment of the
> job enough to send a man out on your say-so, but as a first-time customer,
> they will not be eager unless they have no work on hand.
>
>>I am trying to get an idea of what is a "normal" hourly rate for an
>>electrician. My reason for asking is that I would like to find an
>>electrician that I can use who would bill me "time and materials" -- that
>>is, "X" amount per hour plus the cost of materials. That way, when I have
>>electrical work that needs to be done, I can skip all of the back and
>>forth let-me-give-you-an-estimate for each and every job. I can have the
>>company send someone out and know they can just do the work and bill me by
>>the hour plus materials.
>>
>> For example, if an electrical contracting company said our charge is $120
>> for the first hour, then $80 for each hour after that, plus the cost of
>> materials, I would be fine with that.
>>
>> Today, I needed a simple job done -- replace a 30-foot length of 220V
>> 10/3 wire that runs from the main panel box to the cut-off box outside
>> for the AC condenser unit. It is all easily accessible in a high ceiling
>> basement and the line needs to go through a plain cinder block wall. The
>> line needs to be replaced because the outside insulation on the portion
>> that is on the outside of the house is coming off almost completely
>> leaving the black and white insulated wires exposed to the elements. I
>> thought the person coming out would just do the work and bill me for his
>> time and materials. Instead, he insisted on preparing a whole work order
>> which I agreed to, and then he will come back tomorrow and do the work.
>> The cost is $395 based on two hours of work at $175/hour (his time
>> estimate), plus materials.
>>
>> I agreed to have it done simply because I need it done, and because it is
>> for a house I own that others live in so I want it done by a licensed
>> electrician rather than do it myself.
>>
>> But that started me wondering -- if I have a lot of other electrical work
>> that I want done (which I do) in two other houses that I own, do I want
>> to be paying $175 and hour for an electrician? I don't know what the
>> company is paying it's worker, but I'm guessing less than $50 per hour.
>> Throw another $25 per hour on for benefits, down time, or whatever and
>> that still leaves the company making $100 an hour to cover it's overhead,
>> insurance, etc.
>>
>> I am definitely not cheap, so it's not about me wanting to nickel and
>> dime anyone. But isn't $175 an hour for an electrician over the top?
>>
>> I live in New Jersey.
>>
>
>



Posted by PipeDown on July 6, 2006, 2:13 pm

> Thanks for your response. I do understand what you are saying about what
> it really costs to operate a business. The person who came out to do the
> work was about 23-25 years old. My guess is that he gets paid a lot less
> than $50 per hour since I doubt that he makes $100,000 a year. But I
> picked $50 per hour just to be on the high side.
>
> I have used plumbing companies in the past and they charged between $60
> and $90 per hour plus parts, so when I heard $175 per hour it just struck
> me as high.
>
> I'll definitely check around in my area and maybe I'll find that $175 an
> hour is not unusual.
>


Consider also that a given electrician may not actually be able to find 40
hours a week of work all year round. Or that a company cannot keep all of
its technicians on site all of the time.

It seems electricians cost a bit more than plumbers and the going rate in
San Jose is $100 for them.

$175 for the first two hours is high but acceptable. If he had to do lots
of work or wanted to charge that for an assistant too, then I would put the
brakes on. As long as he is not charging for travel at that rate it might
be OK also. If you live far from his office, he might build the transit and
setup time into the hourly on site rate. Consider what it costs to fill the
tank on a F250 or F350 work truck, it aint cheap.



Posted by ET1742 on July 7, 2006, 7:41 pm
>
> Consider also that a given electrician may not actually be able to find 40
> hours a week of work all year round. Or that a company cannot keep all of
> its technicians on site all of the time.
>
> It seems electricians cost a bit more than plumbers and the going rate in
> San Jose is $100 for them.
>
> $175 for the first two hours is high but acceptable. If he had to do lots
> of work or wanted to charge that for an assistant too, then I would put
> the brakes on. As long as he is not charging for travel at that rate it
> might be OK also. If you live far from his office, he might build the
> transit and setup time into the hourly on site rate. Consider what it
> costs to fill the tank on a F250 or F350 work truck, it aint cheap.

Thanks. His office/business is located about a block and a half from my
house and less than 2 1/2 miles from the job site.

If his charge was $100/hour, I could understand that.



Page 1 of 5       1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
electrician hourly charges July 10, 2007, 1:42 pm
What is a fair electrician hourly rate July 10, 2007, 1:36 pm
Hourly rate plumbing September 2, 2005, 2:21 pm
Hourly rate plumbing September 2, 2005, 4:09 pm
Re Hourly rate plumbing: September 2, 2005, 3:50 pm
On-Line Administrative Support: $18.25 -$25.75 hourly... August 18, 2006, 10:17 am
electric rates March 7, 2006, 11:12 pm
OT: Postal Rates Going UP April 26, 2008, 7:40 pm
Handyman rates November 24, 2008, 5:40 pm
Licensed Plumber rates September 2, 2005, 4:26 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap