|
Posted by on October 17, 2007, 11:09 pm
>cedrowooly@pillinor.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Jeanette Guire wrote:
>>>
>>>>I post this fix so that others who have the infamous Nikon Coolpix series
>>>>of cameras can fix Nikon's engineering flaw in the camera body which Nikon
>>>>refuses to fix despite the tens of thousands of unhappy Nikon Coolpix
>>>>buyers.
>>>>
>>>>Here is a photo of the Nikon Coolpix camera body BEFORE it breaks
>>>>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/NikonCP3100/Images/battcompartment.jpg
>>>>
>>>>Here is a photo of Nikon Coolpix camera body ultimately broken
>>>>http://files.myopera.com/mcduret/blog/IMGP0065b.JPG
>>>>
>>>>Here a user fixed the Nikon Coolpix camera body with a paperclip
>>>>http://www.uthunter.com/images/Nikonfix.jpg
>>>>
>>>>Here a user fix the Nikon Coolpix camera with a tripod
>>>>http://files.myopera.com/mcduret/blog/IMGP0070b.JPG
>>>>
>>>>Here is how I fixed the Nikon Coolpix 3100 camera with epoxy
>>>>http://usera.imagecave.com/
>>>>
>>>>All the reviews totally missed the mark on the Nikon Coolpix camera
>>>>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikoncp3100/
>>>>http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/nikon/coolpix3100-review/
>>>>http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/nikon3100.html
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hmmm,
>>>Thse are throw away cameras like Timex watch.
>>
>>
>>
>> In the 1960s Seiko and Citizens watches where all throw aways too as
>> were vehicles made by Datsun and Toyota...Nikon cameras were well
>> respected for their lens quality...While I could be mistaken, I
>> suspect that they still are.
>Hi,
>Back then do you remember the test Leica engineers did?
>Dropping Leica vs. Canon, Nikon from a height, guess what happened.
>Also cold weather testing. Which camera went to moon first?
>Not Japanese one, Hasselblad. Pro grade cameras still have metal body,
>consumer grade? All plastic! Even most lens. At least prosumer grade
>is more rugged?
But it comes down to "What you can sell, not What you can make."
Doesn't it?
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap