|
Posted by hallerb@aol.com on July 5, 2008, 10:18 am
> Jim Rusling wrote:
> >jmee...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
>
> >>...
>
> >>>Basically, the deal is that such vents make it much too easy for fire =
to
> >>>spread into a structure through them. This is all a consequence of a n=
ew
> >>>set of building codes applicable to houses in certain fire zones calle=
d
> >>>the "Wildland Urban Interface", or WUI.
> >>>...
>
> >> =EF=BF=BDThat would be a rather special case with limited application.
>
> >When we had a grass fire here a year ago, most of the houses that
> >caught fire had wooden fences or dry bushes and the flame went up to
> >the soffit and then into the attic. =EF=BF=BDI was glad I had chain link=
fence
> >and not a wooden one.
>
> Seems that if flames and embers are close enough to go up into soffits,
> it is a lost cause anyway.
> The idea of having no soffits and roof vents seems kind of goofy, but
> that is what keeps
> California going - the absence of attic vents probably would eventually
> turn all the brown-outs
> to black-outs due to increasing energy consumption.
>
> If fences, shrubs and trees are afire, absence of soffit vents ain't
> gonna save a house. =EF=BF=BDA special
> circuit on a sprinkler system might - anyone doing that? =EF=BF=BDAre the=
re
> still wood shake roofs in
> high-risk areas? =EF=BF=BDAnyone who hasn't seen a burning pine tree shou=
ld
> arrange to do so - it
> is amazing. =EF=BF=BDPretty shrubs along the front of the home can turn i=
nto a
> blow torch.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
a weather radio remote control system could likely be set up pretty
cheap to transmit a special tone ordering all homes to close
vents......
although the right screening could likely also prvent fire thru the
vents.
in the olden days miners carried real burning lamps covered with metal
screen so they couldnt start fires ith the flame.....
metal creen with firproof mounting.
all new homes in california should be built of reinforced poured
concrete,
|