Home Page link

Fisher Paykel washer more reliable than Kenmore?

Home| Search | About
Login Password
Register Now! Lost Password?

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 1 of 2       1 2 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Fisher Paykel washer more reliable than Kenmore? me 02-19-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by on February 19, 2007, 1:46 pm


I have a 5 yr old front loading Kenmore washer that has
not been very reliable.

Thinking of selling and going for Fisher Paykel.

Any stats or opinions on how reliable FP is compared to
other brands?

Posted by tom on February 19, 2007, 1:52 pm



> I have a 5 yr old front loading Kenmore washer that has
> not been very reliable.
>
> Thinking of selling and going for Fisher Paykel.
>
> Any stats or opinions on how reliable FP is compared to
> other brands?

There are "lemons" with any brandname. We've used a Kenmore washer since
1989 without a single problem.



Posted by Charlie Morgan on February 19, 2007, 2:27 pm


On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:46:08 -0600, me@privacy.net wrote:

>I have a 5 yr old front loading Kenmore washer that has
>not been very reliable.
>
>Thinking of selling and going for Fisher Paykel.
>
>Any stats or opinions on how reliable FP is compared to
>other brands?

I don't have any stats, but My Fisher & Paykel has been absolutely great and
trouble free. A lot fewer moving parts may be part of the reason. FP has been
well established as a "better" brand in other countries for a very long time.

CWM

Posted by on February 20, 2007, 11:31 am



> A lot fewer moving parts may be part of the reason

This is my gut feeling as well..... the FP has so few
parts compared to a front loader

Do you mind having a top loader tho?

Posted by Charlie Morgan on February 20, 2007, 12:11 pm


On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:31:01 -0600, me@privacy.net wrote:

>
>> A lot fewer moving parts may be part of the reason
>
>This is my gut feeling as well..... the FP has so few
>parts compared to a front loader
>
>Do you mind having a top loader tho?

Not at all. I also like that the FP doesn't need special (expensive)
soap, like the front loaders need, and it uses half as much regular
soap as a conventional top loader.

CWM

Page 1 of 2       1 2 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Fisher Paykel washer and dryer owners here? February 21, 2006, 5:25 pm
Fisher and Paykel Ecosmart Washer Noise February 27, 2007, 10:40 pm
Fisher & Paykel: Washing Machine... October 13, 2005, 1:18 pm
Fisher Paykel power wouldn't turn on April 6, 2008, 1:06 pm
heater problem with fisher-paykel refrigerator October 25, 2006, 11:58 pm
Users of Fisher & Paykel Double Dishdrawer March 21, 2007, 6:37 pm
Kenmore washer again and again... August 17, 2005, 1:48 pm
Kenmore washer April 26, 2007, 11:50 am
Kenmore washer tub problem November 24, 2005, 11:50 pm
Kenmore Washer Problem June 27, 2006, 9:22 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap