Home Page link

Four Years Structural Liability

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 4 of 4       << first < 1 2 3 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Four Years Structural Liability John Wheeler 08-21-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by BobK207 on August 22, 2008, 10:52 am


> I have a home that was built with a costly structural defect. One of
> the load bearing stud walls was built without adequate concrete
> footing.
>
> I contacted the home builder, who told me to contact a structural
> engineer. The engineer informed me that the home builder was liable
> for structural defects for four years after the home's construction.
> Can anyone point me to an online reference with this information or
> anything helpful.
>
> Thanks

John-

You have not said how old the home is or how long you have owned it.

>>>> I contacted the home builder, who told me to contact a structural engi=
neer<<<<<

The home builder who built the home, right?

I think you're leaving out lots of important details (some have been
filed in as the thread has continued)

Looks to be like you contacted the builder about a "costly structural
defect" (how you determined its existence or cost is another issue).

He said "contact a structural engineer"..did the builder also say "&
see what he says or see what the fix would be".

Going the legal route is costly, time consuming & usually
unsatisfying.

Sounds like the builder is being reasonable. Just get the engineer to
take a look & develop a concept for repair.
You'll get a lot more for your money working with the engineer & the
builder, plus the problem will get fixed (if it even needs to be
fixed) The lawyer will spend your money on letters, phone calls &
meetings. Your money is better spent on calcs & concrete.

cheers
Bob

Posted by HeyBub on August 22, 2008, 12:08 pm


John Wheeler wrote:
> I have a home that was built with a costly structural defect. One of
> the load bearing stud walls was built without adequate concrete
> footing.
>
> I contacted the home builder, who told me to contact a structural
> engineer. The engineer informed me that the home builder was liable
> for structural defects for four years after the home's construction.
> Can anyone point me to an online reference with this information or
> anything helpful.
>

Time periods for tolling the statute of limitations are all over the map.
Some start when the defect is first noticed. Some start when you obtain
title to the object (home, power drill, etc.). Some are governed by the
contract.

The technique that always works is to approach the original builder and
threaten to kill his cat unless he fixes the problem.



Posted by TWayne on August 22, 2008, 4:04 pm


> I have a home that was built with a costly structural defect. One of
> the load bearing stud walls was built without adequate concrete
> footing.
>
> I contacted the home builder, who told me to contact a structural
> engineer. The engineer informed me that the home builder was liable
> for structural defects for four years after the home's construction.
> Can anyone point me to an online reference with this information or
> anything helpful.
>
> Thanks

Just look at the length of this thread so far. Why wouldn't you first
contact the the engineer? He's the one knows all about the specs. Why
would you come here until yóu've exhausted the most logical contacts
first? And if you DID do that, why didn't you say so? And what
research have you done on your own so far? Any at all?



Posted by RicodJour on August 22, 2008, 7:59 pm


>
> > I have a home that was built with a costly structural defect. One of
> > the load bearing stud walls was built without adequate concrete
> > footing.
>
> > I contacted the home builder, who told me to contact a structural
> > engineer. The engineer informed me that the home builder was liable
> > for structural defects for four years after the home's construction.
> > Can anyone point me to an online reference with this information or
> > anything helpful.
>
> > Thanks
>
> In the amount of time it took you to do this, reply to posts, etc. you
> could have Googled it. =A0It took me exactly 47 seconds to find an
> answer.
>
> plus into google: product liability, structure home, tennessee
>
> and you get.http://www.uslaw.org/files/public/Tennessee.pdf=A0when
> states:
>
> -------
>
> I. BREACH OF CONTRACT
> Typically a breach of contract claim can be asserted by the purchaser
> against the general contractor, as well as by the general contractor
> against its subcontractors. A general breach of contract claim in
> Tennessee is subject to a six year statute of limitations. T. C. A. =A7
> 28-3-109 (1976). However, it is well settled in Tennessee that the
> three (3) year statue of limitations (Tennessee Code Annotated =A7
> 28-3-105) applies to claims for injuries to realty. This is so
> regardless of whether the causes of actions set forth in the complaint
> are designated as an action for tort (negligence) or contract. To
> determine the nature of the cause of action the court will look to the
> gravemen of the complaint. Whaley v. Perkins, 197 S.W.3d 665, 670
> (Tenn. 2006). The three (3) year statue of limitations begins to run
> when the plaintiff first discovers that he has a cause of action (e.g.
> that there is a problem with the residence). There is also a four (4)
> year statute of repose (Tennessee Code Annotated =A7 28-3-202) which
> provides that all claims related to improvements to property are
> barred if brought more than four (4) years after the date of
> substantial completion, regardless of when the alleged problems were
> discovered.

Pat, I make it a point to give people a beating...errr...education,
when they ask questions on a newsgroup and they obviously haven't done
any research on their own.

The last thing I will do is to spoon feed an adult that doesn't
actually physically require it.

R

Posted by Art on August 24, 2008, 12:39 am


You need to bring your construction contract to an attorney to review. Only
he can tell you if you have any rights against the builder. The engineer is
going by local building code but the contract may exclude liability for that
and have a binding arbitration clause and if you signed such a contract than
you are screwed. It is amazing to me that people will sign a contract to
build a $500000 house and not spend $200 to have an attorney explain to them
what they are signing.


>I have a home that was built with a costly structural defect. One of
> the load bearing stud walls was built without adequate concrete
> footing.
>
> I contacted the home builder, who told me to contact a structural
> engineer. The engineer informed me that the home builder was liable
> for structural defects for four years after the home's construction.
> Can anyone point me to an online reference with this information or
> anything helpful.
>
> Thanks



Page 4 of 4       << first < 1 2 3
Similar ThreadsPosted
Structural Adhesive, And Usage of ? January 7, 2006, 1:40 pm
Structural engineering question July 19, 2006, 8:47 pm
structural insulated panels May 27, 2007, 7:53 pm
contractor liability question November 25, 2006, 8:16 pm
Re: Handyman Liability Insurance April 18, 2007, 10:58 pm
Re: Handyman Liability Insurance April 18, 2007, 11:08 pm
Re: Handyman Liability Insurance April 19, 2007, 1:49 pm
Re: Handyman Liability Insurance April 19, 2007, 3:49 pm
Re: Handyman Liability Insurance April 19, 2007, 6:57 pm
Window replacement in structural brick wall July 31, 2005, 5:10 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap