Home Page link

HDTV antennas & complaints

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 13 of 13       << first < 1 2 3 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
HDTV antennas & complaints james12321 08-20-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Rudy on August 21, 2007, 3:09 am

> Anyhow, my question is whether I will also have to buy a new rooftop
> antenna.

Depends on how good your signal is.
I took a standard 15 yr old antenna off a mobile home they were moving, put
it up on our Park Model and connected to our new LCD TV in Tucson AZ. I get
14 local HD channels and the picture is great except when there are local
storms.
>Will I be able to use the same rotor ?

No reason why not



PexSupply PEX Tools 468x60
Posted by on August 22, 2007, 4:45 pm
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 03:18:40 -0500, james12321@none.com wrote:

>I heard that in another year or so we will all be forced to either buy
>a HDTV or buy a converter. Having all standard tv sets, and I am
>neither able to afford a HDTV, nor am I impressed by their picture, I
>am not at all happy about this. I live in the country where the only
>means to get tv channels is to either spend half my paycheck on
>satellite, or use an antenna on the roof. I chose the antenna, and
>most of the time I get fairly good reception on a few local channels.
>
You can get satellite TV installed for free in four rooms with
individual boxes IIRC. Your monthly service will vary, but I'm pretty
sure you can get a basic 200 channel deal with no premium channels for
around $30/month. If you're only earning $60/month, you will have
trouble mounting a dish to a cardboard box or shopping cart. You must
have a slick WiFi setup, hanging out at Starbucks. But seriously...
its not THAT expensive.

>I suppose I will have no choice but to buy a convertor, but I surely
>will make a big fuss about it with whatever governmental agency is
>behind this conspiracy to promote the sales of HDTVs and the crappy
>broken up and spotty pictures they produce. I sure hope that the
>convertor will produce a better picture on a standard tv than that on
>the actual hdtvs.
>
I have a HDTV and the picture is _very_ impressive, but you can still
use your existing TV with either a cable box converter or a satellite
receiver, and the unit will convert the new digital TV signal into a
less sharp analog signal.

>Anyhow, my question is whether I will also have to buy a new rooftop
>antenna. My present antenna broke during a windstorm and I
>temporarily fixed it with some tubing and ducttape. I was planning to
>buy a new antenna when a friend told me that he thinks I will need a
>HDTV antenna too, but was not sure if an old antenna would also work.
>Does anyone know? Will I be able to use the same rotor or does that
>need to be changed too?
>
Assuming you buy a digital-capable TV (not a HD TV), you should be
able to buy an antenna specifically designed to pick up the new
signals. IF you buy a HDTV, only then will you be faced with the
dilemma of whether to try and capture OTA HD signals with a
HD-designed antenna, or if you spring for the monthly satellite or
cable service. Comcast basic cable currently costs about $9.00/month.
You'd have to assume when there is no analog signal to broadcast and
all they can send is digital and digital HD... pricing might go up a
skoosh, but if they try to rip everyone off... yeah, congress will get
involved because free TV is like air and votes... both are needed.

>If anyone knows what government agency to file a complaint about this
>HDTV conspiracy, please let me know. Tv channels have been the same
>since the beginning of television, and now we got these republican
>morons forcing us to change just so the HDTV companies can rob people
>charging them ten or more times the price of a regular tv and giving
>them a lousy picture. Just the same story as always these days, pay
>more, and get less..... I wonder how much money the republicans are
>getting to shove this HDTV shit on us?
>
I think you should write to both your congressmen and to the Director
of the FCC, but its a done deal and has been delayed for about 5 years
already.
>James

James... I assume this post was a joke but I figured I'd go along with
it.


Posted by Phisherman on August 22, 2007, 6:40 pm
It's easy to replace a regular TV with a HD TV. If you watch TV at
all, the improvement is well worth the cost. I have a plasma TV, but
no cable. I have a power HD antennae in the attic that works great.
Sometimes the reception is not too good when there are storms so I
switch over to a regular broadcast which usually eliminates cut-outs.
Or, I watch a DVD. Cable cost would exceed the plasma TV cost in 3
years or less. With an antennae you will need to do some
experimentation. I bought 5 HD power antennas, kept the best one, and
returned the others. I found that antenna cost has little to do with
quality, at least for the ones under $50. That's progress: It's time
to trash the rabbit ears.

Page 13 of 13       << first < 1 2 3
Similar ThreadsPosted
Truck Complaints April 6, 2006, 12:17 pm
Basics of Customer Complaints March 18, 2008, 2:33 pm
Outdoor Tv antennas October 21, 2005, 7:19 pm
How do I get those HDTV channels November 14, 2007, 8:04 am
old DirecTV and Sqamsung HDTV receivers March 10, 2006, 5:45 pm
HDTV question/opinion wanted. January 14, 2007, 6:59 pm
Is HDTV and RG59 coax cable compatible July 17, 2005, 11:49 pm
Cables Big Three Team Up For Special HDTV Offers June 26, 2007, 10:57 am
Radio Shack antenna and new HDTV doesn't receive many channels any more March 27, 2008, 11:02 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap