Home Page link

Hail and wind damage to roof and siding and insurance companies ??

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 1 of 2       1 2 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Hail and wind damage to roof and siding and insurance companies ?? Steve 06-03-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Steve on June 3, 2008, 3:31 am
I have noticed that in the last three or so years that about 20 percent of
the houses in my subdivision in northwest suburban Chicago have gotten new
siding and roofs. The houses here are about 15 years old. Almost all have
been done by the same company that scours the neighboorhood after storms
looking for any type of damage.

My wife said they stopped by our house the other day and wanted to know if
we wanted our roof and siding replace because of hail and wind damage and
that it would cost us nothing more than our deductible or something like
that (my wife often does not get the whole story or ask a lot of questions)
and that they would do most the talking with the insurance company. I said
what damage. She showed me a piece of loose siding by the side of the garage
on the top row. I said that has been like that for years and I intend to fix
it someday - really. Then she showed me about 10 shingles that were elevated
ever so slightly which I said that I can fix that in about an hour with some
roofing cement like I used to do on my first house back in more lean times.

So my question is this legit in that these companies can get the insurance
companies to pay for almost all costs with only what I would call very minor
damage that a handy man would probably fix for $100 ?? Wouldn't the
insurance companies at least want to pro rate the roof replacement based on
the age of the roof?? Why in the world would they replace all the siding
with such little damage. Or maybe there is more to it than that and the home
owners are picking up a percentage of the repairs?

As for me I don't like to mess with insurance companies as they always seem
to have a way [individually or as a group] to get their money back
particualry if you look like the type of client that is going to call them
for every little thing. I basically want to be covered in case of a fire,
car theft, or something like that.

Thanks for any advice, input, experiences, or opinions.

Steve




Posted by Joseph Meehan on June 3, 2008, 7:49 am
I suggest you contact your insurance company.

I had a similar situation and after the storm many homes had damage. I
did not say any on my home, but some homes even had window screens ripped
up. The storm chasers were out and I ignored all they had to say, but I did
call my insurance company. They sent out an inspector. The inspector
showed me where the damage was and offered several suggestions. I chose to
have the damage repaired and followed a couple of his suggestions to improve
my venting and I was able to leave some cosmetic damage (dents in gutters
and down spouts) an apply that to upgrading the new roof. I asked for
suggestions about local contractors and I had worked with one of the two
that were suggested and they did a very nice job.

> I have noticed that in the last three or so years that about 20 percent of
> the houses in my subdivision in northwest suburban Chicago have gotten new
> siding and roofs. The houses here are about 15 years old. Almost all have
> been done by the same company that scours the neighboorhood after storms
> looking for any type of damage.
>
> My wife said they stopped by our house the other day and wanted to know if
> we wanted our roof and siding replace because of hail and wind damage and
> that it would cost us nothing more than our deductible or something like
> that (my wife often does not get the whole story or ask a lot of
> questions) and that they would do most the talking with the insurance
> company. I said what damage. She showed me a piece of loose siding by the
> side of the garage on the top row. I said that has been like that for
> years and I intend to fix it someday - really. Then she showed me about 10
> shingles that were elevated ever so slightly which I said that I can fix
> that in about an hour with some roofing cement like I used to do on my
> first house back in more lean times.
>
> So my question is this legit in that these companies can get the insurance
> companies to pay for almost all costs with only what I would call very
> minor damage that a handy man would probably fix for $100 ?? Wouldn't the
> insurance companies at least want to pro rate the roof replacement based
> on the age of the roof?? Why in the world would they replace all the
> siding with such little damage. Or maybe there is more to it than that and
> the home owners are picking up a percentage of the repairs?
>
> As for me I don't like to mess with insurance companies as they always
> seem to have a way [individually or as a group] to get their money back
> particualry if you look like the type of client that is going to call them
> for every little thing. I basically want to be covered in case of a fire,
> car theft, or something like that.
>
> Thanks for any advice, input, experiences, or opinions.
>
> Steve
>
>
>


--
Joseph Meehan

Dia 's Muire duit




Posted by Ralph Mowery on June 3, 2008, 8:33 am

>I have noticed that in the last three or so years that about 20 percent of
>the houses in my subdivision in northwest suburban Chicago have gotten new
>siding and roofs. The houses here are about 15 years old. Almost all have
>been done by the same company that scours the neighboorhood after storms
>looking for any type of damage.
>
> My wife said they stopped by our house the other day and wanted to know if
> we wanted our roof and siding replace because of hail and wind damage and
> that it would cost us nothing more than our deductible or something like
> that (my wife often does not get the whole story or ask a lot of
> questions) and that they would do most the talking with the insurance
> company. I said what damage. She showed me a piece of loose siding by the
> side of the garage on the top row. I said that has been like that for
> years and I intend to fix it someday - really. Then she showed me about 10
> shingles that were elevated ever so slightly which I said that I can fix
> that in about an hour with some roofing cement like I used to do on my
> first house back in more lean times.
>
> So my question is this legit in that these companies can get the insurance
> companies to pay for almost all costs with only what I would call very
> minor damage that a handy man would probably fix for $100 ?? Wouldn't the
> insurance companies at least want to pro rate the roof replacement based
> on the age of the roof?? Why in the world would they replace all the
> siding with such little damage. Or maybe there is more to it than that and
> the home owners are picking up a percentage of the repairs?
>

I and several neighbors have had our roofs replaced twice. We live in the
middle of North Carolina. One time was after a hurricane that came way
inland and about 2 years due to hail. I have a $ 500 deductiable and that
was what it cost both times.



Posted by Red Green on June 3, 2008, 11:31 pm

>
>>I have noticed that in the last three or so years that about 20
>>percent of the houses in my subdivision in northwest suburban Chicago
>>have gotten new siding and roofs. The houses here are about 15 years
>>old. Almost all have been done by the same company that scours the
>>neighboorhood after storms looking for any type of damage.
>>
>> My wife said they stopped by our house the other day and wanted to
>> know if we wanted our roof and siding replace because of hail and
>> wind damage and that it would cost us nothing more than our
>> deductible or something like that (my wife often does not get the
>> whole story or ask a lot of questions) and that they would do most
>> the talking with the insurance company. I said what damage. She
>> showed me a piece of loose siding by the side of the garage on the
>> top row. I said that has been like that for years and I intend to fix
>> it someday - really. Then she showed me about 10 shingles that were
>> elevated ever so slightly which I said that I can fix that in about
>> an hour with some roofing cement like I used to do on my first house
>> back in more lean times.
>>
>> So my question is this legit in that these companies can get the
>> insurance companies to pay for almost all costs with only what I
>> would call very minor damage that a handy man would probably fix for
>> $100 ?? Wouldn't the insurance companies at least want to pro rate
>> the roof replacement based on the age of the roof?? Why in the world
>> would they replace all the siding with such little damage. Or maybe
>> there is more to it than that and the home owners are picking up a
>> percentage of the repairs?
>>
>
> I and several neighbors have had our roofs replaced twice.

Just curious. Totally replaced all the shingles? How bad was the damage?
I mean repair was not considered?

> We live in
> the middle of North Carolina.

Where? I'm in FAY.

> One time was after a hurricane that
> came way inland


> and about 2 years due to hail. I have a $ 500
> deductiable and that was what it cost both times.
>

Surprised they did not want to prorate age, especially the first time.



Posted by Ralph Mowery on June 4, 2008, 8:01 am

>
>>
>> We live in
>> the middle of North Carolina.
>
> Where? I'm in FAY.
>
>> One time was after a hurricane that
>> came way inland
>
>
>> and about 2 years due to hail. I have a $ 500
>> deductiable and that was what it cost both times.
>>
>
> Surprised they did not want to prorate age, especially the first time.
>
>

The house the shingles were replaced in was in China Grove, South of
Salisbury. I now live abouth halfway between Rockwell and Granet Quarry.

Al the shingles on all the houses were replaced. They probably could not
match the blown off shingles due to the hurricane, not sure. Also they had
to replace two storm windows that were broken during the hurricane. The
hail dammage was to way too many shingles to just repair them.
They did not send out an inspector the first time, but they did for the
hail dammage.I was just told to get an estiment and send it to them. They
sent me a check back for the dammages minus the deductiable. I think it was
about $ 250 teh first time and $ 500 the second time.The first time it was
made to me and the bank as I still owed some on the house. The second time
it was made to me as I had payed off the house.

It might be the kind of insurance you have if it is prorated or not.



Page 1 of 2       1 2 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
New roof after hail damage - dealing with contractor August 12, 2005, 3:40 pm
Roof Repair Bids - Hail Damage November 20, 2006, 8:01 am
Insurance shingle wind damage November 17, 2006, 6:56 pm
Demanding Home Insurance Companies January 14, 2006, 9:50 pm
insurance companies & claims: allstate, usaa, etc, etc December 13, 2006, 3:46 pm
Vinyl siding blown off by wind March 15, 2006, 12:08 am
Hurricane Damage to your Roof . . . ? July 17, 2006, 8:33 pm
Roof Damage from Sleigh December 25, 2006, 3:55 pm
Insurance demands new roof! September 27, 2007, 6:34 pm
Make insurance claim on roof or pay for myself? June 22, 2008, 6:09 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap