Home Page link

Heat Recovery Ventilator

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Heat Recovery Ventilator Greg 10-11-2006
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Greg on October 12, 2006, 9:31 am



m Ransley wrote:
> Do you really need one, only a blower door test will determine if your
> house is tight.

Thanks everyone for the information. I hadn't considered running the
HRV on a timer but it sounds like a reasonable approach to scaling down
the oversized equipment.

As for whether or not I actually need an HRV, I'm far from an HVAC
expert so I cannot tell for sure. The house however, located on Cape
Cod, is (by far) in the most humid environment I've ever lived. Its
rare, even in the winter with the wood stove running, that the indoor
humidity level will drop below 60%RH (in the summer if floats around
70-80%). The house is relatively tight, but could be better (I haven't
yet had a blower door test). In the past I've run a bathroom
ventilation fan for an hour or so each day to circulate the air.

Is there a difference between so called HRV and ERVs? Does one not
deal with humidity?

Greg


Posted by Paul M. Eldridge on October 12, 2006, 10:31 am


Hi again Greg,

I live on the Atlantic coast as well (Halifax, N.S.) and at this
moment the relatively humidity stands at 97 per cent. I run my
dehumidifier virtually non-stop nine months of the year and try to
minimize any indoor sources of moisture, e.g., wiping down the walls
after showering, cooking with tightly covered pots, etc. I'm not
convinced exhaust fans are appropriate in our climate given that the
makeup air (i.e., the air drawn back inside the house) is likely to be
equally humid. I tend to believe a dehumidifier and HRV would be the
better option, especially if mould and mildew are of concern.

Although I'm not absolutely positive about this, I believe EVRs
transfer at least some humidity between the incoming and outgoing air
streams, so a HVR would be the better choice.

Cheers,
Paul


>Thanks everyone for the information. I hadn't considered running the
>HRV on a timer but it sounds like a reasonable approach to scaling down
>the oversized equipment.
>
>As for whether or not I actually need an HRV, I'm far from an HVAC
>expert so I cannot tell for sure. The house however, located on Cape
>Cod, is (by far) in the most humid environment I've ever lived. Its
>rare, even in the winter with the wood stove running, that the indoor
>humidity level will drop below 60%RH (in the summer if floats around
>70-80%). The house is relatively tight, but could be better (I haven't
>yet had a blower door test). In the past I've run a bathroom
>ventilation fan for an hour or so each day to circulate the air.
>
>Is there a difference between so called HRV and ERVs? Does one not
>deal with humidity?
>
>Greg

Posted by Robert Gammon on October 13, 2006, 8:40 am


Greg wrote:
> m Ransley wrote:
>
>> Do you really need one, only a blower door test will determine if your
>> house is tight.
>>
>
> Thanks everyone for the information. I hadn't considered running the
> HRV on a timer but it sounds like a reasonable approach to scaling down
> the oversized equipment.
>
> As for whether or not I actually need an HRV, I'm far from an HVAC
> expert so I cannot tell for sure. The house however, located on Cape
> Cod, is (by far) in the most humid environment I've ever lived. Its
> rare, even in the winter with the wood stove running, that the indoor
> humidity level will drop below 60%RH (in the summer if floats around
> 70-80%). The house is relatively tight, but could be better (I haven't
> yet had a blower door test). In the past I've run a bathroom
> ventilation fan for an hour or so each day to circulate the air.
>
> Is there a difference between so called HRV and ERVs? Does one not
> deal with humidity?
>
> Greg
>
>
ERVs transfer heat and humidity. HRVs only transfer heat.

The price difference is not extreme.

HRVs gain favor in Canada in particular as cold air entering the home is
a bigger problem for them than for most of us, and electric resistance
heating seems to dominate the heatings systems there.

Humidity management suggests running an ERV so long as outside temps are
in the range 20F to 100F, and RH indoors is above RH outdoors. Got to
worry about DewPoint and condensation.


Posted by on October 12, 2006, 7:57 am



>Any of the HRV models will work in your home.

But a typical 2400 ft^2 US house leaks 0.7 ACH, ie 0.7x2400x8/60 = 224 cfm,
so an HRV saves almost no energy, compared to a less-expensive exhaust fan
which might only run when the outdoor temp is close to the indoor temp.

>A constant 105CFM does a complete change out of the air in your home in
>1.5 hours.

Way too much. Enough for 7 full-time occupants, by ASHRAE standards.

>So a reasonable approach is to use a timer that will allow you to run it
>20 minutes out of every hour for a complete change out in 4.5 hours

Still too much. Andersen says an average family of 4 evaporates 2 gallons
per day of water, ie 16.66lb/24h = 0.694 lb/h. In a mythical airtight US
house with 15 cfm of fresh air with an outdoor humidity ratio wo = 0.0025
pounds of water per pound of dry air (Phila in January) and wi indoors,
15x60x0.075(wi-wo) = 0.694 makes wi = 0.0128, so Pi = 29.921/(1+0.62198/wi)
= 0.603 "Hg, vs 0.748 for 70 F at 100% RH, for an 81% indoor RH.

But that's high enough to allow mold and mildew, so it might be reasonable
to run an HRV when the indoor RH rises to 60% in wintertime, with a timer
that only allows it to run in the afternoon, when outdoor air is warmer.

Nick


Posted by Energy Conservation in Housing on October 16, 2006, 9:42 pm



Greg wrote:
> I'm considering adding a Heat Recovery Ventilator to my 1200 sq.ft.
> house heated by solar thermal with a wood stove backup. However, most
> of these devices that I've found seem suited only for larger houses
> (>2500 sq.ft.). Can anybody recommend a good brand of 'mini' heat
> recovery ventilators?
>
> thanks,

16 Oct 2006
Typically, HRVs are useful for very tight, extremely well insulated
houses.
A lot of conventionally built houses are sufficiently leaky / drafty,
so as not to require much more than exhaust fans in the bathrooms.

About 18 years ago, I made a homemade HRV, which I used in my house for
the next 16 years (then I moved). In my current house, I use prolonged
use of exhaust fans, and opening windows (just a crack) to feed the
exhaust fans. That seems to provide a fairly continuous supply of
fresh air, but is a bit drafty in the winter. But it rarely gets below
+15 degrees F. where I currently live, so it is tolerable.

For a source of information on infiltration, HRVs and ventilation, I
have some documents you can access on-line.

All the text data is also on a Google site (with no diagrams), but it
has the links to the Yahoo site and two alternative MSN sites, with
much of the same data.

http://groups.google.com/group/Energy-Conservation-in-Housing

Good luck.
Dave


Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2
Similar ThreadsPosted
Air to Air Heat Exchange Ventilator? October 3, 2006, 6:22 pm
Heat Loss through bathroom ventilator - passive October 28, 2006, 9:54 pm
Shower wastewater heat recovery October 25, 2005, 6:55 pm
Heat recovery from molten slag June 7, 2008, 3:48 am
Fixing a Down draft ventilator fan March 29, 2006, 1:14 pm
Leslie-Locke attic ventilator July 18, 2005, 12:11 pm
What is good for removing kitchen grease from ventilator ductwork ?? August 31, 2005, 8:04 pm
Furnace Stops prematurely while in recovery mode January 31, 2007, 9:13 pm
High efficiency, high recovery water heaters July 24, 2008, 2:43 pm
Whirlpool electric dryer; problem with heat/thermal cut-offs (no heat) August 31, 2007, 12:58 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap