|
Posted by Clot on October 17, 2009, 7:14 pm
norminn@earthlink.net wrote:
> Oren wrote:
>> wrote:
>>> VicP wrote:
>>>> I notice that a lot of "guys" here refer to their wives as SWMBO
>>>> (She Who Must Be Obeyed). That's interesting. What's up with that?
>>>> I've never seen it anywhere else.
>>>> I've never seen so many "guys" proudly pretending that they are
>>>> pussy whipped. I'm wondering if this might be a case of double
>>>> reverse psychology: the "guy" pretends that he's pussy whipped in
>>>> the hope that people will think that he wouldn't be "pretending"
>>>> if it were so. But in actually it is indeed so.
>>> When it is appropriate I use "SWMBO'd". I think you will find it is
>>> common practice on many user groups. Generally, at this
>>> establishment, it is probably 6 of this and half a dozen of the
>>> other. However, there are times when I feel that it is circumspect
>>> to obey SWMBO'd!
>> ""If Mama Ain't Happy, Ain't Nobody Happy"
>>
http://www.tumbleweedpottery.com/v/vspfiles/assets/images/products640x480/4851.jpg
> I suspect the same is true of "daddy". Thankfully, there isn't much
> psychoanalysis going on in this newsgroup. Considering the lengthy
> arguments that sometimes go on in AHR, I suspect there are very few of
> any kind of "whipped" subjects participating. All seem able to hold
> their own, although some can be quick to "flip the bird".
> I'm not the obedient type, nor do I expect the "other half" to obey.
> Reaching agreement can be a significant and satisfying challenge :o)
> OTOH, there are spouses who would not notice if the other painted the
> living room purple. Takes all kinds :o)
Crumbs, SWMBO'd painted the whole house pink!
I'll get my coat! ;)
|
> Who Must Be Obeyed). That's interesting. What's up with that? I've
> never seen it anywhere else.
> I've never seen so many "guys" proudly pretending that they are pussy
> whipped. I'm wondering if this might be a case of double reverse
> psychology: the "guy" pretends that he's pussy whipped in the hope
> that people will think that he wouldn't be "pretending" if it were so.
> But in actually it is indeed so.