|
Posted by JoeSpareBedroom on May 6, 2008, 8:57 pm
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>> stratford1 wrote:
>>>> Ok, thanks everyone for the advice. Following up on what some of you
>>>> have said... This is an entryway deck so although we wont be on it
>>>> barefoot (at least originally), should we be concerned about tracking
>>>> in any chemicals from the boards? Our plan is to eventually stain the
>>>> deck...will this sufficiently seal in the chemicals? We dont have any
>>>> kids now, but could eventually - and overall I'd rather not have toxic
>>>> stuff exposed regardless. Also how should we address the toxic nature
>>>> of these boards with the philosophy that the deck should be left
>>>> untreated (unstained) for a year to let it breathe? Is there a good
>>>> way to deal with toxic boards for a year? Sorry for all the questions
>>>> on this...I'm a little caught by suprise on this - I was under the
>>>> assumption originally that PT decking was sort of the standard. Its
>>>> starting to sound like more hassle than its worth. Ideas?
>>> My personal opinion is the "problem" is far overblown to the severity of
>>> the disease.
>>
>>
>> I could be convinced. Show me your sources of information, please.
>
> You never showed a single documented problem in the previous dozen or so
> go-rounds, Joe. So, I'll pass this time... :)
>
> --
These chemicals generally aren't tested on humans because no sane human
would agree to it, the way people agree to take part in drug testing.
Therefore, you are the guinea pig. Some problems take quite some time to
develop, which makes them difficult to test for.
But, you knew that. You're just arguing for sport.
|