Home Page link

Incandescent that avoids upcoming ban

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 12 of 12       << first < 1 2 3 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Incandescent that avoids upcoming ban Don Klipstein 04-27-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by terry on May 4, 2008, 3:00 pm
> thanks for the info. =A0 sounds hoaky to me though.
>
> s
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
>
> >>What's this bs about a ban? =A0I've not kept up with the messages.
>
> > =A0A recently enacted piece of USA Federal legislation bans manufacture,=

> > sale and importation of certain incandescent lamps, starting in 2012.
>
> > =A0"General purpose" incandescent lamps of a certain range of light outp=
ut
> > and failing to achieve some specific standard of energy efficiency will =
be
> > banned in 2012. =A0This will include 100 and 75 watt "regular"
> > incandescents. =A0In 2014, this will expand to include 60 and 40 watt
> > "regular" incandescents that fail to meet that level of energy efficienc=
y.
>
> > =A0The "usual regular" incandescents of 75-100 watts will be banned in 2=
012
> > and the "usual regular" incandescents of 40-60 watts will be banned in
> > 2014.
>
> > =A0The improved incandescents that Paul Eldridge and I mentioned have
> > sufficient energy efficiency to not be affected until 2020 according to
> > this law.
>
> > =A0GE is planning to put similar ones on the market in 2010.
>
> > =A0"Specialty" incandescents are largely not affected. =A0Paul Eldridge
> > posted a list of unaffected ones in the "candlelight thread" in
> > alt.home.repair on April 20 in article
>
> > =A0That one can be viewed via Google (along with 24 other articles in th=
e
> > "candlelight thread" of at least 104 articles) by going to:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.home.repair/browse_thread/thread/
> > 695cb5879218f939/b9f8c930e2f6a64e?hl=3Den&
>
> > =A0That article also mentions availability at Home Depot of incandescent=
s
> > that have sufficient energy efficiency to not be banned in 2012-2014.
>
> > - Don Klipstein (d...@misty.com)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Apart from possible health problems which frankly seemed far-fetched!
We keep posting the following: People do not seem to realise that so
called 'wasted electricity' creates warmth!
Here we use electricity most months of the year for home heating.
Especially cool/cold evenings when lights tend to be on anyway.
Any 'wasted' heat from the use of 'old fashioned' incandescent bulbs,
which cost about 25 cents each btw, merely helps to warm the house! So
the electric heaters in the rooms in use don't cut in as often.
We have a bathroom for example which when in use has six 40 watt
bulbs, the wasted heat from those 240 watts of non CFL bulbs, means
that the 500 watt bathroom electric heater rarely cuts in at all!
Similarly our computer/bedroom is heated almost entirely by two
computers running almost continuously and one desk lamp at night.
In other words if one uses electricity for heating anyway, almost
every month of the year, from October through July it doesn't matter
how it becomes household warmth!
Using CFLs outside for lights that are on for lengthy periods where
the heat would be wasted does make sense. But that seems to be a use
where CFLs do not perform well in cold climates?
One big electricity 'waster' is a domestic dryer, which chucks damp
heated air outside, to avoid mildew/mould and dampness problems.
Use a clothesline as much as possible when weather allows; even cold
weather.
Also CFLs are said to not work a well where they are frequently switch
on/off such as stairways, cupboards, occasional visits to a shed etc.
Also they don't work (or don't work well) in outside lights equipped
with sensors that come on when someone comes close to them!
All in all not convinced yet that there is an overall saving and in
view of the ten times cost of CFLs, that they are regarded as
'Hazardous waste' by garbage collectors etc. not yet in the mood to
give up the incandescents. We have a neighbour who is heavily into
CFLs, three of which are outside and on all night. Since within their
house they use electrcity for heating there has been effectively no
decrease in thei elctricity consumption or their power bill!

Posted by ransley on May 4, 2008, 4:15 pm
>
>
>
>
>
> > thanks for the info. =A0 sounds hoaky to me though.
>
> > s
>
>
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > >>What's this bs about a ban? =A0I've not kept up with the messages.
>
> > > =A0A recently enacted piece of USA Federal legislation bans manufactur=
e,
> > > sale and importation of certain incandescent lamps, starting in 2012.
>
> > > =A0"General purpose" incandescent lamps of a certain range of light ou=
tput
> > > and failing to achieve some specific standard of energy efficiency wil=
l be
> > > banned in 2012. =A0This will include 100 and 75 watt "regular"
> > > incandescents. =A0In 2014, this will expand to include 60 and 40 watt
> > > "regular" incandescents that fail to meet that level of energy efficie=
ncy.
>
> > > =A0The "usual regular" incandescents of 75-100 watts will be banned in=
2012
> > > and the "usual regular" incandescents of 40-60 watts will be banned in=

> > > 2014.
>
> > > =A0The improved incandescents that Paul Eldridge and I mentioned have
> > > sufficient energy efficiency to not be affected until 2020 according t=
o
> > > this law.
>
> > > =A0GE is planning to put similar ones on the market in 2010.
>
> > > =A0"Specialty" incandescents are largely not affected. =A0Paul Eldridg=
e
> > > posted a list of unaffected ones in the "candlelight thread" in
> > > alt.home.repair on April 20 in article
>
> > > =A0That one can be viewed via Google (along with 24 other articles in =
the
> > > "candlelight thread" of at least 104 articles) by going to:
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.home.repair/browse_thread/thread/
> > > 695cb5879218f939/b9f8c930e2f6a64e?hl=3Den&
>
> > > =A0That article also mentions availability at Home Depot of incandesce=
nts
> > > that have sufficient energy efficiency to not be banned in 2012-2014.
>
> > > - Don Klipstein (d...@misty.com)- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Apart from possible health problems which frankly seemed far-fetched!
> We keep posting the following: People do not seem to realise that so
> called 'wasted electricity' creates warmth!
> Here we use electricity most months of the year for home heating.
> Especially cool/cold evenings when lights tend to be on anyway.
> Any 'wasted' heat from the use of 'old fashioned' incandescent bulbs,
> which cost about 25 cents each btw, merely helps to warm the house! So
> the electric heaters in the rooms in use don't cut in as often.
> We have a bathroom for example which when in use has six 40 watt
> bulbs, the wasted heat from those 240 watts of non CFL bulbs, means
> that the 500 watt bathroom electric heater rarely cuts in at all!
> Similarly our computer/bedroom is heated almost entirely by two
> computers running almost continuously and one desk lamp at night.
> In other words if one uses electricity for heating anyway, almost
> every month of the year, from October through July it doesn't matter
> how it becomes household warmth!
> Using CFLs outside for lights that are on for lengthy periods where
> the heat would be wasted does make sense. But that seems to be a use
> where CFLs do not perform well in cold climates?
> One big electricity 'waster' is a domestic dryer, which chucks damp
> heated air outside, to avoid mildew/mould and dampness problems.
> Use a clothesline as much as possible when weather allows; even cold
> weather.
> Also CFLs are said to not work a well where they are frequently switch
> on/off such as stairways, cupboards, occasional visits to a shed etc.
> Also they don't work (or don't work well) in outside lights equipped
> with sensors that come on when someone comes close to them!
> All in all not convinced yet that there is an overall saving and in
> view of the ten times cost of CFLs, that they are regarded as
> 'Hazardous waste' by garbage collectors etc. not yet in the mood to
> give up the incandescents. We have a neighbour who is heavily into
> CFLs, three of which are outside and on all night. Since within their
> house they use electrcity for heating there has been effectively no
> decrease in thei elctricity consumption or their power bill!- Hide quoted =
text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You are of a minority group that does not use AC in summer, and has
cheaper electric than NG.

Posted by Don Klipstein on May 4, 2008, 11:27 pm
terry wrote:

(To condense, mostly an argument that CFLs do not save money if your
home is in a colder climate and is heated electrically)

Is there a heat pump in the home? If so, then the heat pump is a less
costly heating method than other elctrical loads. The heat output of a
heat pump is not all from the electricity it uses - about half of it is
heat pumped into the house from the outside.

If you don't have a heat pump, see if it is worth getting one.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

Page 12 of 12       << first < 1 2 3
Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Are you prepared for the upcoming depression? May 3, 2008, 9:13 pm
Re: Are you prepared for the upcoming depression? May 4, 2008, 1:53 am
Upcoming international student seminar April 7, 2006, 5:43 am
CFL vs Incandescent April 27, 2008, 5:11 pm
halogen or incandescent March 3, 2007, 12:57 pm
What is the highest wattage incandescent January 9, 2007, 9:57 am
CFL vs incandescent bulb: Brightness April 28, 2008, 2:45 pm
Non-incandescent freezer light bulb November 23, 2006, 2:28 am
Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps December 23, 2007, 4:28 am
Re: Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps December 25, 2007, 4:04 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap