Home Page link

Incandescent that avoids upcoming ban

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 4 of 12       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Incandescent that avoids upcoming ban Don Klipstein 04-27-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by krw on May 3, 2008, 7:16 pm
jeff@spam_me_not.com says...
> krw wrote:
> > jeff@spam_me_not.com says...
> >> krw wrote:

<snip>

> >>> I'm not about to use CFLs anywhere I spend any time.
> >> And, why not?
> >
> > Primarily because I can't stand the light and they're too slow to
> > turn on where I don't care about the light.
> >
> >> I'm not about
> >>> to replace all my fixtures either.
> >> Why would you have to?
> >
> > CFLs aren't for many fixtures. They do get hot and the electronics
> > doesn't like it. You have a lot to learn, my boy.
>
> Not as much as you.

I'm sure IKYABWAI is the best argument you can come up with.

> There's other alternatives (at a higher cost) for the heat hell holes
> you mention. Personally, I've never liked or used recessed lighting.

I do, but I'm not forcing you to have them.

> Most of them are big leaks in a homes thermal envelope, but you haven't
> impressed me as caring much about conservation, just consumption.

Nonsense. How does a thermal leak occur between floors? If idiots,
like you, design houses all sorts of stupid things are likely to
happen.

> >> A case of bulbs here, and a case
> >>> there...
> >>>
> >>>> I'd still like to use R12, but the switchover did close the ozone
> >>>> hole. Remember that?
> >>> Oh, good grief!
> >> I suppose you are still questioning evolution? And global warming?
> >
> > Don't be an ass.
>
> Don't be a flunky.

Hardly a fluky, ass.

> >>>> Sometimes you have to do something because it has a far greater
benefit.
> >>> Someimes you just have to be a good little sheep, eh Komrad?
> >> Look whose calling who a sheep?
> >
> > You *are* a perfect example of a sheep, who likes it when the man
> > from Washington bends you over. I bet you really love those 1.6gal
> > toilets.
>
> You've been listening to way too much wingnut radio/tv. Such is right
> wing opinion in that it is all opinion and no facts. Just insult anyone
> who disagrees. Don't let reality get in the way.

Absolutely the truth, which your "argument" falls well short of
addressing.

> BTW, I have an old fashioned toilet because I live in an old house, but
> have no objection to the new design toilets. The new ones work, as
> opposed to the first generation.

You like to spout government lies. I have a set of "new" ones.
They don't.

> You'd have thought that congress would have thought up
> > something larger, given their needs.
> >
> >> Sometimes it pays not to be a sheep and blindly believe all that horse
> >> manure W has been dishing out for the last 7 years. I'd say lemming is a
> >> more appropriate term.
> >
> > Don't be an idiot. I know it's hard work to think, but try it
> > anyway.
>
> You seem to think we can just keep living the way we do now. I'm sure
> the Mayans felt the same way as they gobbled up all the available resources.

There are a *lot* of things we can do and will have to do. Having
government (or you) force change for changes sake is asinine.
Choice is a good thing. The market will decide the matters soon
enough without government screwing up the economy.

> >> The tungsten light bulb has been around almost 100 years.
> >
> > The planet has been around a tad longer than that and is still
> > useful.
> >
> >> There's
> >> nothing else we use that comes anywhere near being as inefficient.
> >
> > Now, don't add lies to your list of sins, junior.
>
> Name a common appliance that is less efficient. The only thing in the
> same ballpark is the common loudspeaker, but their drain on the grid is
> minor.

Define efficient. Televisions. Toasters.

> >> The
> >> common light bulb rings in at about 5%. It doesn't have great color
> >> rendition unless corrected in which case it has a shorter life or is
> >> even less efficient, it runs up the heat load in summer, it has a
> >> terrible lifespan... The only real advantage it has is that it is cheap.
> >> But not cheap when you consider the lifespan or the energy it uses.
> >
> > Tungsten lights have far better color rendition than most CFLs.
>
> It's hard to call 2800K, good color rendition.

It's hard to call halogens, 2800K.

> > Halogens (which I use almost exclusively), even better.
>
> A few hundred degrees hotter.

Stupid.

> >
> There are excellent color balanced CFLs available, suitable for
> viewing and judging color balance in photography. Much better than the
> short lived photo floods. Certainly better than the common incandescent
> or your halogens.

They all suck. I've tried them, and relegated them to the basement
(when I had one). I own none now because I hate them.

> >> But hey, if you guys love your 100 year old design 100 Watt bulbs. I
> >> don't happen to have your emotional attachment.
> >
> > If that's your best argument, hang up your spurs, kid.
>
> I don't understand your problem. No one is taking away your specialty
> halogen lights. All we are talking about is the old edison based lamps
> which should join the trash bin of obsolete technology.

They aren't "specialty". They have an Edison screw base, and come
in the standard sizes. I have "standard" tungsten in some floor
lamps though and closets though. I'll be buying a few hundred over
the next couple of years because you leftist loons are forcing your
religion on others, again.

> >> Jeff
> >>>> Jeff
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I have a sneaking suspicion the majority of Americans do
> >>>>> too.
> >>> Sheep? Evidently...
> >>>
> > obviously

Obviously.


--
Keith

Posted by ransley on May 3, 2008, 8:57 pm
> jeff@spam_me_not.com says...
>
> > krw wrote:
> > > jeff@spam_me_not.com says...
> > >> krw wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > >>> I'm not about to use CFLs anywhere I spend any time.
> > >> =A0 =A0And, why not?
>
> > > Primarily because I can't stand the light and they're too slow to
> > > turn on where I don't care about the light.
>
> > >> =A0 I'm not about
> > >>> to replace all my fixtures either.
> > >> Why would you have to?
>
> > > CFLs aren't for many fixtures. =A0They do get hot and the electronics
> > > doesn't like it. =A0You have a lot to learn, my boy.
>
> > =A0 =A0Not as much as you.
>
> I'm sure IKYABWAI is the best argument you can come up with.
>
> > =A0 There's other alternatives (at a higher cost) for the heat hell hole=
s
> > you mention. Personally, I've never liked or used recessed lighting.
>
> I do, but I'm not forcing you to have them.
>
> > Most of them are big leaks in a homes thermal envelope, but you haven't
> > impressed me as caring much about conservation, just consumption.
>
> Nonsense. =A0How does a thermal leak occur between floors? =A0If idiots,
> like you, design houses all sorts of stupid things are likely to
> happen.
>
> > >> =A0 A case of bulbs here, and a case
> > >>> there...
>
> > >>>> =A0 I'd still like to use R12, but the switchover did close the ozo=
ne
> > >>>> hole. Remember that?
> > >>> Oh, good grief!
> > >> I suppose you are still questioning evolution? And global warming?
>
> > > Don't be an ass.
>
> > Don't be a flunky.
>
> Hardly a fluky, ass.
>
> > >>>> =A0 =A0Sometimes you have to do something because it has a far grea=
ter benefit.
> > >>> Someimes you just have to be a good little sheep, eh Komrad?
> > >> Look whose calling who a sheep?
>
> > > You *are* a perfect example of a sheep, who likes it when the man
> > > from Washington bends you over. =A0I bet you really love those 1.6gal
> > > toilets.
>
> > You've been listening to way too much wingnut radio/tv. Such is right
> > wing opinion in that it is all opinion and no facts. Just insult anyone
> > who disagrees. Don't let reality get in the way.
>
> Absolutely the truth, which your "argument" falls well short of
> addressing.
>
> > BTW, I have an old fashioned toilet because I live in an old house, but
> > have no objection to the new design toilets. The new ones work, as
> > opposed to the first generation.
>
> You like to spout government lies. =A0I have a set of "new" ones. =A0
> They don't. =A0
>
> > =A0 =A0You'd have thought that congress would have thought up
> > > something larger, given their needs.
>
> > >> Sometimes it pays not to be a sheep and blindly believe all that hors=
e
> > >> manure W has been dishing out for the last 7 years. I'd say lemming i=
s a
> > >> more appropriate term.
>
> > > Don't be an idiot. =A0I know it's hard work to think, but try it
> > > anyway.
>
> > You seem to think we can just keep living the way we do now. I'm sure
> > the Mayans felt the same way as they gobbled up all the available resour=
ces.
>
> There are a *lot* of things we can do and will have to do. =A0Having
> government (or you) force change for changes sake is asinine. =A0
> Choice is a good thing. =A0The market will decide the matters soon
> enough without government screwing up the economy.
>
> > >> =A0 =A0The tungsten light bulb has been around almost 100 years.
>
> > > The planet has been around a tad longer than that and is still
> > > useful.
>
> > >> There's
> > >> nothing else we use that comes anywhere near being as inefficient.
>
> > > Now, don't add lies to your list of sins, junior.
>
> > Name a common appliance that is less efficient. The only thing in the
> > same ballpark is the common loudspeaker, but their drain on the grid is
> > minor.
>
> Define efficient. =A0Televisions. =A0Toasters. =A0
>
> > >> The
> > >> common light bulb rings in at about 5%. It doesn't have great color
> > >> rendition unless corrected in which case it has a shorter life or is
> > >> even less efficient, it runs up the heat load in summer, it has a
> > >> terrible lifespan... The only real advantage it has is that it is che=
ap.
> > >> But not cheap when you consider the lifespan or the energy it uses.
>
> > > Tungsten lights have far better color rendition than most CFLs.
>
> > =A0 It's hard to call 2800K, good color rendition.
>
> It's hard to call halogens, 2800K.
>
> > > Halogens (which I use almost exclusively), even better.
>
> > =A0 =A0A few hundred degrees hotter.
>
> Stupid.
>
>
>
> > =A0 There are excellent color balanced CFLs available, suitable for
> > viewing and judging color balance in photography. Much better than the
> > short lived photo floods. Certainly better than the common incandescent
> > or your halogens.
>
> They all suck. =A0I've tried them, and relegated them to the basement
> (when I had one). =A0I own none now because I hate them.
>
> > >> =A0 =A0But hey, if you guys love your 100 year old design 100 Watt bu=
lbs. I
> > >> don't happen to have your emotional attachment.
>
> > > If that's your best argument, hang up your spurs, kid.
>
> > I don't understand your problem. No one is taking away your specialty
> > halogen lights. All we are talking about is the old edison based lamps
> > which should join the trash bin of obsolete technology.
>
> They aren't "specialty". =A0They have an Edison screw base, and come
> in the standard sizes. =A0I have "standard" tungsten in some floor
> lamps though and closets though. =A0I'll be buying a few hundred over
> the next couple of years because you leftist loons are forcing your
> religion on others, again.
>
> > >> =A0 =A0Jeff
> > >>>> =A0 =A0Jeff
>
> > >>>> I have a sneaking suspicion the majority of Americans do
> > >>>>> too.
> > >>> Sheep? =A0Evidently...
>
> > > obviously
>
> Obviously.
>
> --
> Keith

krw check out a review of cfls at Popular Mechanics magazine, the new
soft white are not what was out a few years ago, even by brand it
different, PM put a HD soft white at Par with incandesant. And putting
in cans in my kitchen does now allow out alot of air by sidewall loss
up to the attic.

Posted by krw on May 4, 2008, 6:15 pm
In article <d781eac8-bb27-4d3c-931f-
23991041876b@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, Mark_Ransley@yahoo.com=20
says...
> > jeff@spam_me_not.com says...
> >
> > > krw wrote:
> > > > jeff@spam_me_not.com says...
> > > >> krw wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > >>> I'm not about to use CFLs anywhere I spend any time.
> > > >> =A0 =A0And, why not?
> >
> > > > Primarily because I can't stand the light and they're too slow to
> > > > turn on where I don't care about the light.
> >
> > > >> =A0 I'm not about
> > > >>> to replace all my fixtures either.
> > > >> Why would you have to?
> >
> > > > CFLs aren't for many fixtures. =A0They do get hot and the electroni=
cs
> > > > doesn't like it. =A0You have a lot to learn, my boy.
> >
> > > =A0 =A0Not as much as you.
> >
> > I'm sure IKYABWAI is the best argument you can come up with.
> >
> > > =A0 There's other alternatives (at a higher cost) for the heat hell h=
oles
> > > you mention. Personally, I've never liked or used recessed lighting.
> >
> > I do, but I'm not forcing you to have them.
> >
> > > Most of them are big leaks in a homes thermal envelope, but you haven=
't
> > > impressed me as caring much about conservation, just consumption.
> >
> > Nonsense. =A0How does a thermal leak occur between floors? =A0If idiots=
,
> > like you, design houses all sorts of stupid things are likely to
> > happen.
> >
> > > >> =A0 A case of bulbs here, and a case
> > > >>> there...
> >
> > > >>>> =A0 I'd still like to use R12, but the switchover did close the =
ozone
> > > >>>> hole. Remember that?
> > > >>> Oh, good grief!
> > > >> I suppose you are still questioning evolution? And global warming?
> >
> > > > Don't be an ass.
> >
> > > Don't be a flunky.
> >
> > Hardly a fluky, ass.
> >
> > > >>>> =A0 =A0Sometimes you have to do something because it has a far g=
reater benefit.
> > > >>> Someimes you just have to be a good little sheep, eh Komrad?
> > > >> Look whose calling who a sheep?
> >
> > > > You *are* a perfect example of a sheep, who likes it when the man
> > > > from Washington bends you over. =A0I bet you really love those 1.6g=
al
> > > > toilets.
> >
> > > You've been listening to way too much wingnut radio/tv. Such is right
> > > wing opinion in that it is all opinion and no facts. Just insult anyo=
ne
> > > who disagrees. Don't let reality get in the way.
> >
> > Absolutely the truth, which your "argument" falls well short of
> > addressing.
> >
> > > BTW, I have an old fashioned toilet because I live in an old house, b=
ut
> > > have no objection to the new design toilets. The new ones work, as
> > > opposed to the first generation.
> >
> > You like to spout government lies. =A0I have a set of "new" ones. =A0
> > They don't. =A0
> >
> > > =A0 =A0You'd have thought that congress would have thought up
> > > > something larger, given their needs.
> >
> > > >> Sometimes it pays not to be a sheep and blindly believe all that h=
orse
> > > >> manure W has been dishing out for the last 7 years. I'd say lemmin=
g is a
> > > >> more appropriate term.
> >
> > > > Don't be an idiot. =A0I know it's hard work to think, but try it
> > > > anyway.
> >
> > > You seem to think we can just keep living the way we do now. I'm sure
> > > the Mayans felt the same way as they gobbled up all the available res=
ources.
> >
> > There are a *lot* of things we can do and will have to do. =A0Having
> > government (or you) force change for changes sake is asinine. =A0
> > Choice is a good thing. =A0The market will decide the matters soon
> > enough without government screwing up the economy.
> >
> > > >> =A0 =A0The tungsten light bulb has been around almost 100 years.
> >
> > > > The planet has been around a tad longer than that and is still
> > > > useful.
> >
> > > >> There's
> > > >> nothing else we use that comes anywhere near being as inefficient.
> >
> > > > Now, don't add lies to your list of sins, junior.
> >
> > > Name a common appliance that is less efficient. The only thing in the
> > > same ballpark is the common loudspeaker, but their drain on the grid =
is
> > > minor.
> >
> > Define efficient. =A0Televisions. =A0Toasters. =A0
> >
> > > >> The
> > > >> common light bulb rings in at about 5%. It doesn't have great colo=
r
> > > >> rendition unless corrected in which case it has a shorter life or =
is
> > > >> even less efficient, it runs up the heat load in summer, it has a
> > > >> terrible lifespan... The only real advantage it has is that it is =
cheap.
> > > >> But not cheap when you consider the lifespan or the energy it uses=
.
> >
> > > > Tungsten lights have far better color rendition than most CFLs.
> >
> > > =A0 It's hard to call 2800K, good color rendition.
> >
> > It's hard to call halogens, 2800K.
> >
> > > > Halogens (which I use almost exclusively), even better.
> >
> > > =A0 =A0A few hundred degrees hotter.
> >
> > Stupid.
> >
> >
> >
> > > =A0 There are excellent color balanced CFLs available, suitable for
> > > viewing and judging color balance in photography. Much better than th=
e
> > > short lived photo floods. Certainly better than the common incandesce=
nt
> > > or your halogens.
> >
> > They all suck. =A0I've tried them, and relegated them to the basement
> > (when I had one). =A0I own none now because I hate them.
> >
> > > >> =A0 =A0But hey, if you guys love your 100 year old design 100 Watt=
bulbs. I
> > > >> don't happen to have your emotional attachment.
> >
> > > > If that's your best argument, hang up your spurs, kid.
> >
> > > I don't understand your problem. No one is taking away your specialty
> > > halogen lights. All we are talking about is the old edison based lamp=
s
> > > which should join the trash bin of obsolete technology.
> >
> > They aren't "specialty". =A0They have an Edison screw base, and come
> > in the standard sizes. =A0I have "standard" tungsten in some floor
> > lamps though and closets though. =A0I'll be buying a few hundred over
> > the next couple of years because you leftist loons are forcing your
> > religion on others, again.
> >
> > > >> =A0 =A0Jeff
> > > >>>> =A0 =A0Jeff
> >
> > > >>>> I have a sneaking suspicion the majority of Americans do
> > > >>>>> too.
> > > >>> Sheep? =A0Evidently...
> >
> > > > obviously
> >
> > Obviously.
> >
> > --
> > Keith
>=20
> krw check out a review of cfls at Popular Mechanics magazine, the new

Popular Mechanics? You mean that rag that had pictures of ion-
powered helicopters? I haven't picked up that waste of trees since=20
I was a kid.

> soft white are not what was out a few years ago, even by brand it
> different,

Of course, and you never know what you're buying. =20

> PM put a HD soft white at Par with incandesant.=20

Not that I care what PM would ever have to say...

> And putting
> in cans in my kitchen does now allow out alot of air by sidewall loss
> up to the attic.

Huh? =20

--=20
Keith

Posted by Don Klipstein on May 4, 2008, 1:20 am
>jeff@spam_me_not.com says...
>> krw wrote:
>> > jeff@spam_me_not.com says...


>> You've been listening to way too much wingnut radio/tv. Such is right
>> wing opinion in that it is all opinion and no facts. Just insult anyone
>> who disagrees. Don't let reality get in the way.
>
>Absolutely the truth, which your "argument" falls well short of
>addressing.
>
>> BTW, I have an old fashioned toilet because I live in an old house, but
>> have no objection to the new design toilets. The new ones work, as
>> opposed to the first generation.
>
>You like to spout government lies. I have a set of "new" ones.
>They don't.

I see so many 1.6 gallon/flush toilets nowadays that work as well as
toilets ever did. This does have an effect on my consideration as to
which side I would call a liar!

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

Posted by max on May 4, 2008, 6:44 am
don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote:

> >jeff@spam_me_not.com says...
> >> krw wrote:
> >> > jeff@spam_me_not.com says...
>
>
> >> You've been listening to way too much wingnut radio/tv. Such is right
> >> wing opinion in that it is all opinion and no facts. Just insult anyone
> >> who disagrees. Don't let reality get in the way.
> >
> >Absolutely the truth, which your "argument" falls well short of
> >addressing.
> >
> >> BTW, I have an old fashioned toilet because I live in an old house, but
> >> have no objection to the new design toilets. The new ones work, as
> >> opposed to the first generation.
> >
> >You like to spout government lies. I have a set of "new" ones.
> >They don't.
>
> I see so many 1.6 gallon/flush toilets nowadays that work as well as
> toilets ever did. This does have an effect on my consideration as to
> which side I would call a liar!
>
> - Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

i would say that if one has difficulty with one's 1.6 gal. toilet, one
should reacquaint oneself with <http://www.mypyramid.gov/> instead of
embarking to recapitulate the work of Morgan Spurlock.

--
This signature can be appended to your outgoing mesages. Many people include in
their signatures contact information, and perhaps a joke or quotation.

Page 4 of 12       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Are you prepared for the upcoming depression? May 3, 2008, 9:13 pm
Re: Are you prepared for the upcoming depression? May 4, 2008, 1:53 am
Upcoming international student seminar April 7, 2006, 5:43 am
CFL vs Incandescent April 27, 2008, 5:11 pm
halogen or incandescent March 3, 2007, 12:57 pm
What is the highest wattage incandescent January 9, 2007, 9:57 am
CFL vs incandescent bulb: Brightness April 28, 2008, 2:45 pm
Non-incandescent freezer light bulb November 23, 2006, 2:28 am
Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps December 23, 2007, 4:28 am
Re: Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps December 25, 2007, 4:04 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap