|
Posted by John Doe on July 3, 2006, 8:55 pm
she's right. & no worse than al frnken. & better looking.
> "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York
> Times Building."
>
> - Ann Coulter
>
> In her most recent Human Events column titled 'This Is Why We Don't
> Trust Democrats With National Security', Ann Coulter exposes the real
> truth about 911. The fact is, dimwits like Ann Coulter, who are neither
>
> Democrat nor Republican [they are what you call IDEOLOGUES] have
> hijacked American foreign policy and they think they can
> singlehandedly defeat terrorists.
>
> Osama Bin Laden is winning the game. Pre-911, Ann Coulter's pal,
> Barbara Olson routinely hogged airtime to talk about Clinton, Lewinsky
> and Chandra Levy. Their public laundry list did not expose the secret
> war against terrorism because they wanted to capture all the glory the
> way they handed it to Reagan when the hostages were released. But their
>
> little, September Surprise went up in smoke -with Barbara Olson.
> Guess the National Security interests took a back seat to Coulter's
> obsession, and that's why we have 911 widows.
>
> I think Ann Coulter and her cohorts ought to be investigated
> for the strange deaths of JFK Jr., Paul Wellstone and Mel Carnahan,
> because Ann Coulter said, "liberals are always against America.
> They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America's
> self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant." Were all these
> "traitors" murdered, to preserve America?
>
> Despite a total lack of credibility, it's amazing that main stream
> media outlets give her the platforms that they do. While there are
> kooks on the left and right, there is no left-wing equivalent to
> the hate-filled, bat-shit loony lying quasi-fascist stuff that
> Coulter peddles that gets put on all the major networks to sell
> books and ofter analysis. And no, Pelosi, Michael Moore, etc.,
> aren't close (for example, neither has "joked" recently about
> murdering Justice Stevens and Jack Murtha).
>
> Maybe she's doing a schtick to get money (although she seems like she
> wants to be taken seriously, except when she's forced to say "it was
> just a joke"); if so, that still seems a shameful way to make a buck.
> It's also possible that she is legit insane, or a true fascist.
>
> But the fact that the media keeps treating her like she's someone to
> take seriously is the real shame here, and it is indeed another piece
> of evidence that the media isn't really "liberal." Coulter is at best
> a bitchy troll, and as all us internet folks know, the real suckers are
>
> those who respond to trolls. Hence, the media are at best suckers.
>
>
> http://un.alturl.com
>
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap