|
Posted by AZ Nomad on March 10, 2007, 6:50 pm
>user wrote:
>> HeyBub wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> They could, but they don't. If you can point to one single monopoly
>>> that HAS raised prices in a captive market, I'd be surprised (except
>>> for professional sports and government-sanction monopolies like
>>> utilities).
>>
>> Microsoft, and with Vista
>You're right. Even considering inflation, Vista costs more than Windows 95.
>But with the greater productivity of Vista, users make more money and,
>hence, can pay more. The additional cost is still a lower percentage of
>their disposable income than was Win95.
Vista hasn't greater productivity. Quite the opposite actually as vista
users will spend most of their time staring at the hourglass whereas a
windows 95 user could get some usefull work done with a pentium I.
Unless, of course, you supply Vista with at least 6 ghz of processor, 4GB
of ram, etc.
|