|
Posted by SJF on November 9, 2005, 2:44 pm
>>>i believe that due to reflection the sensor will be confused and turn
>>> the light off in your example.
>>> i believe you are describing an indoor photo-eye device.
>>> other options:
>>> 1. replace with a 60 watt incandescent fixture with a photo-eye
>>> already in it
>>> 2. or replace with a 13 watt flourescent fixture with a photo-eye
>>> already in it
>>> 3. or add an outdoor photo-eye mounted on an outdoor electrical box for
>>> your present fixture.
>> I have to question the several recommendations for a fluorescent bulb
>> used with a photo sensor in this thread, based on my recent experience.
>> I mounted entry lights at front and back doors with photo sensors built
>> into the fixture. Installed 13 watt compact fluorescent bulbs. Early
>> failure of both bulbs at about 200 hours of use. Repeated with different
>> brand bulbs -- same result. I concluded, and this has been confirmed by
>> several comments I've read on newsgroups, that the repeated blinking of
>> the lights at dusk cannot be tolerated by these bulbs. I'm now using 40
>> watt incandescents as the cheaper alternative.
>> SJF
> I installed an 18 watt (75 watt equiv) CFL in our outdoor post (it has a
> photocell control built into it). It's been three years now and I haven't
> had to replace it yet. It runs every night, all night.
Much better situation. I got reflection off the wall which caused the
blinking at turn-on. With your post mounted light, you should have been
able to avoid the blinking. Off wall mounting, if convenient, is obviously
the
better way to do it.
SJF
|
> the light off in your example.
> i believe you are describing an indoor photo-eye device.
> other options:
> 1. replace with a 60 watt incandescent fixture with a photo-eye
> already in it
> 2. or replace with a 13 watt flourescent fixture with a photo-eye
> already in it
> 3. or add an outdoor photo-eye mounted on an outdoor electrical box for
> your present fixture.