|
Posted by ransley on September 8, 2008, 10:20 am
> I am looking for a low power consumption dehumidifier to cut costs. I
> seen these 2 below that use only a couple hundred watts compared to
> mine which uses 792 watts(30 pint). I have a 1000 Sq ft. house and
> will have the unit in the basement. Would these work well. I would say
> my house has the "typical"basement" . The surround air 510 says it
> will remove 21 pints per day in the specs but 28 pints down lower in
> the description? I used this formula to figure out I am spending
> almost $60 per month to run my unit now which is 792 watts:
> (watts/1000) x hours used x cents per kil. hour=3D operating cost
> 792watts/1000 =A0x =A024 hours (during summer) x10 cents(estimate)=3D$1.9=
0
> (24 hours) x 30 days=3D $57
> With lower power consumption dehumidifier:
> 195 watts/1000 x 24 x 10=3D 47 cents x 30days=3D $14.10
> http://www.startremodeling.com/dehumidifier_sa.htmhttp://www.indoorhealth=
products.com/800-dehumidifier.htm
> Is this too good to be true or are these things marketing scams that
> wont work well? Thanks a lot
I would not consider either one, I saw no Energy Star rating in
either, ES ratings are going to save you more. If you realy want a
review Consumer Reports has them
|
> seen these 2 below that use only a couple hundred watts compared to
> mine which uses 792 watts(30 pint). I have a 1000 Sq ft. house and
> will have the unit in the basement. Would these work well. I would say
> my house has the "typical"basement" . The surround air 510 says it
> will remove 21 pints per day in the specs but 28 pints down lower in
> the description? I used this formula to figure out I am spending
> almost $60 per month to run my unit now which is 792 watts:
> (watts/1000) x hours used x cents per kil. hour=3D operating cost
> 792watts/1000 =A0x =A024 hours (during summer) x10 cents(estimate)=3D$1.9=