|
Posted by norminn@earthlink.net on October 17, 2009, 2:02 pm
Jim Elbrecht wrote:
> trader4@optonline.net wrote:
>
> -snip-
>> Are people doing the volcano pile high mulch thing everywhere now?
>> Here in NJ it's become the common thing over the last decade or so.
>> I attributed it to nyc folks who don;t know any better and have been
>> migrating here in droves.
>> Lately I've noticed another factor. In new construciton, I've seen 7
>> ft trees planted with the huge mulch volcanoes, at least a foot
>> high. Turns out, the trees were planted without much of a hole.
>> Looks like a half-assed way to avoid digging the proper hole. And by
>> the time the tree dies, it isn't there problem anymore.
>
> 1 foot high? Seems 3 feet is the rule here-- Near Albany, NY. The
> first time I saw it I thought they were just healing in the plants on
> newly delivered mulch. The dumbest looking one I've seen had 45
> degree slopes and some 3-4ft high pointy evergreens planted on them
> perpendicular to the slope.
>
>> To answer the OP question, no reason mulch about 3" thick or so should
>> harm any tree, unless it's mulch that was made out of something toxic.
>
> That was my thought--- Some disease or chemical in the mulch. "Bark
> mulch" covers a whole lot of different materials.
>
> Jim
Kind of hard to imagine bark mulch containing sufficient chemicals to
harm a tree...s'pose anything is possible :o)
|
>
> My reason was so I wouldn't have to mow under the branches which are low
> to the ground. Keeps the grass and weeds from growing under there.