Home Page link

Old BX or new Romex? What would you do?

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 3 of 4       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Old BX or new Romex? What would you do? Nate Nagel 02-25-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by HerHusband on February 27, 2008, 9:55 am
>> Old cloth covered AC cable was in my opinion, the worst of all
>> building cables. Anything would be better

> So, you would rather have knob & tube or 2-wire ungrounded NM?

Assuming the insulation is in good condition, either is actually quite
usable electrically (though the lack of ground is a problem).

However, you can insulate around NM wire, whereas you're not supposed to
insulate around knob and tube wiring. I think it's because the insulation
doesn't hold up to the increased heat build-up.

Anthony

AppliancePartsPros.com, Inc.
Posted by bud-- on February 27, 2008, 11:38 am
HerHusband wrote:

>
> However, you can insulate around NM wire, whereas you're not supposed to
> insulate around knob and tube wiring. I think it's because the insulation
> doesn't hold up to the increased heat build-up.
>

The current Romex (NM-B) has 90 degree C insulation. One reason is
because Romex was being put in insulation.

Old K&T has 60 degree insulation. But so did Romex until relatively
recently. And with the old Romex 2 conductors, and their generated heat,
are run immediately adjacent.

--
bud--

Posted by John Grabowski on February 26, 2008, 7:56 am

> Which would you rather see in a basement for wiring? Old BX or new Romex?
> I'm really not sure which should be preferable. BX has cloth covered
> insulators and just the little strip for ground, but it is working well
> (was working on a switch hot and accidentally touched the box, the lights
> were off almost simultaneously with the spark - woops. Just for the record
> I was wearing my work boots and was careful not to let my hands touch
> anything metal; I just didn't realize that the switch I was using was
> almost as wide as a single gang box...) cloth covered insulation appears
> to be in good shape. I like the damage resistance of the BX, but I also
> like the higher temperature rating of the new NM-B.
>
> I'm certain that the old cloth had a 60C temperature rating if any; new
> NM-B has 90C. Does it really make a big difference? I know the right
> answer to the question is "use new BX with 90C insulation and a separate
> ground wire" but... um... you priced BX lately? I am definitely replacing
> a few runs with romex to allow for a 3-way switch on the stairwell light
> and will be replacing a couple lampholders with shop lights (cheap 'n'
> sleazy, just using short fixture whips out of the blank plate of the
> octagon box, there's no ceiling in the laundry room and won't be until
> *ALL* the wiring is done)
>
> Also, in situations where someone's already been there and pulled
> somewhat-newer Romex, do you generally consider it acceptable to
> "repurpose" it if it runs where I need it? This is all the old NM not
> NM-B, and for extra goodness some of it has a 16AWG ground. Is this a big
> deal? Repulling it is not the end of the world, just a minor PITA. I know
> it's not the best it could be, but ISTM that it should be acceptable...
>
> Oddly enough, this whole line of thought was prompted by the light at the
> bottom of the stairs going out as I was pulling a piece of Romex through
> the same space. Whenever I knocked against one of the pieces of BX going
> into the ceiling box (I was reaching above the ceiling space between the
> studs) the light would go out, and then when I touched it again it would
> come back on. I figured this needed immediate attention, and I just
> imagined that I'd find that I'd have to repull all of the runs that
> entered the box due to it being fried. Imagine my surprise when I pulled
> it down and everything looked fine inside, but when I removed the
> lampholder itself the neutral screw was loose. OK, reinstall, works.
> Left it dangling from the wires and carefully wiggled the two wire nuts
> inside the box. When I wiggled the neutral, the light would flicker. Not
> good! removed wire nut, here it didn't have any spiral steel insert and
> was very loose on the wires. Some electrician - presumably back in
> 1948! - didn't notice it, and here it was to freak me out 60 years
> later... A new wire nut out of the electrical drawer and all is working
> fine now :)



I vote for new. When you go to sell the house it will look better to have
new wiring. I don't like working with the cloth covered conductors.


Posted by hallerb@aol.com on February 26, 2008, 8:53 am

> I vote for new. =EF=BF=BDWhen you go to sell the house it will look better=
to have
> new wiring. =EF=BF=BDI don't like working with the cloth covered conductor=
s.- Hide quoted text -
>

We agree on this........


Posted by HerHusband on February 26, 2008, 6:51 pm
> Which would you rather see in a basement for wiring?
> Old BX or new Romex?

My personal preference would be new Romex installed through holes drilled
in the joists (NOT stapled to a beam or the underside of the joists). If
the BX is not stapled in place, you can use the old cable to pull the new
Romex through.

If drilling the joists is not an option, I would use surface mounted PVC
conduit and individual wires.

On the other hand, if the original BX cable is still in good shape, there's
no immediate need to replace it. Just replace it where needed and update
the rest to Romex as time and money allows.

That said, I've heard local codes in some areas require conduit or metallic
shielding for ALL wiring. I think the Chicago area was one of them, but I
don't remember for sure. You might want to check with your local permit
office (and probably get an electrical permit).

> I'm certain that the old cloth had a 60C temperature rating if any;
> new NM-B has 90C. Does it really make a big difference?

Lower temperature wiring can be a big problem around light fixtures. The
heat from the light makes the insulation brittle, which flakes off and
leaves exposed conductors. I've worked on lots of lights in old houses that
have completely bare wires, just waiting to start a fire. Kind of scary
when you open it up and see that.

Still, you don't necessarily need to replace the entire run. Just mount a
junction box nearby and run the higher temp Romex from the light to the
junction box. Then tie the old cable into that and join the two cables in
the box. Replace the circuit later when you have the time.

Anthony

Page 3 of 4       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Romex wiring December 15, 2005, 8:54 pm
Saving romex December 8, 2006, 8:56 pm
Splicing Romex April 5, 2008, 5:00 pm
Romex Cables and Armouring October 10, 2005, 5:01 pm
Re: Romex in SHORT run of conduit? June 13, 2005, 10:18 am
romex inside greenfield January 23, 2006, 3:03 pm
Exposed Romex in Garage... August 15, 2006, 5:36 pm
Romex color code? December 17, 2006, 7:56 pm
Romex Stapled to Joists August 2, 2007, 10:15 am
Running Romex behind drywall... August 19, 2007, 1:43 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap