Home Page link

Oreck vacuum hype (was: Re: Can anyone recommend a decent vacuum cleaner?)

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Oreck vacuum hype (was: Re: Can anyone recommend a decent vacuum cleaner?) Anonymous 08-05-2006
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Anonymous on August 5, 2006, 4:18 pm
grappletech wrote on Sun, Jul 23 2006 at 7:41 pm:

> We bought an Oreck for about $250 2 years ago. Included
> about 20 free bags, a free powerful small canister type
> vacuum with attachments for getting in tight places (great
> for cars too), and a free cordless clothes iron. The Oreck is
> wonderful. It's VERY powerful. It sucks up a ton of gunk, so
> you'll be changing bags more often. And it's lightweight. Stay
> away from all the shiny hunks of plastic vacuums at Target,
> Kmart, etc

I dig perky-hot Terri Ouellette, but round-faced David Oreck
strikes me as less than honest. His latest pitch against bagless
vacuums is standard overkill; always make the competing product
look like extra trouble.

You can simply empty a bagless canister outside or seal the
opening with a plastic bag. We use that method inside the
bathtub and rinse any extra down the drain. Do it carefully and
the "invisible" dust won't migrate far. Mr. Oreck deliberately
holds the canister high above the garbage can for maximum
fluorescent scatter.

Also, picking up a bowling ball doesn't so much attest to a
vacuum's strength as it does the air-tightness of a rubber seal.
You can lift a bowling ball with a big suction cup and no motor
assist.

Brands like Oreck and Kirby are overpriced and overhyped. How
much does an endless supply of Oreck bags cost? He doesn’t
mention that in his advantages list. I’d try a Dyson if you’re
going to spend big bucks.

N.P.


Posted by Art Todesco on August 5, 2006, 9:42 pm
Interesting thing about picking up
bowling balls. Notice first
they us a large funnel, say 8" in
diameter. That equates to about
25 square inches. A suction of 1 psi
would yield 25 pound of
pickup force, enough for the average 20
pound bowling ball (I
think bowling balls are about 20 pounds
... right?).
1 psi is 27" of water. A 27" sealed
suction vacuum cleaner is
not a very powerful vacuum. My central
system is about 120" (H2O).
Sealed suction is good for picking up
bowling balls, however,
you also need a reasonable volume of air
along with good sealed
suction to make a good vacuum cleaner.
Nuf said.

Anonymous wrote:
> grappletech wrote on Sun, Jul 23 2006 at 7:41 pm:
>
>
>>We bought an Oreck for about $250 2 years ago. Included
>>about 20 free bags, a free powerful small canister type
>>vacuum with attachments for getting in tight places (great
>>for cars too), and a free cordless clothes iron. The Oreck is
>>wonderful. It's VERY powerful. It sucks up a ton of gunk, so
>>you'll be changing bags more often. And it's lightweight. Stay
>>away from all the shiny hunks of plastic vacuums at Target,
>>Kmart, etc
>
>
> I dig perky-hot Terri Ouellette, but round-faced David Oreck
> strikes me as less than honest. His latest pitch against bagless
> vacuums is standard overkill; always make the competing product
> look like extra trouble.
>
> You can simply empty a bagless canister outside or seal the
> opening with a plastic bag. We use that method inside the
> bathtub and rinse any extra down the drain. Do it carefully and
> the "invisible" dust won't migrate far. Mr. Oreck deliberately
> holds the canister high above the garbage can for maximum
> fluorescent scatter.
>
> Also, picking up a bowling ball doesn't so much attest to a
> vacuum's strength as it does the air-tightness of a rubber seal.
> You can lift a bowling ball with a big suction cup and no motor
> assist.
>
> Brands like Oreck and Kirby are overpriced and overhyped. How
> much does an endless supply of Oreck bags cost? He doesn’t
> mention that in his advantages list. I’d try a Dyson if you’re
> going to spend big bucks.
>
> N.P.
>

Posted by professorpaul on August 7, 2006, 4:16 pm
We own two Orecks. Bought one outright, the other refurbished on E-bay.
We live at the Delaware shore, and get lots of sand in from guests,
fluffy dog, etc. They work great. Since they are not self-propelled,
you do have to push them at a low angle on something like shag carpet.
They tend to work better on smooth floors, and Berber carpet. The
"spif" of the small canister vac wasn't all that great, but works fine
for the car and workbench. DO make it a point to change the bags
regularly, and keep a spare belt around. One spare belt is fitted into
the base of the cleaner. Prior to this, we had a couple of Hoovers and
a Eureka. The Hoover was always getting jamed up with dog hair (had
Goldens -- enough spare fur for another puppy when they shed), and the
belts didn't hold up well. We like the light weight of the Oreck. One
for upstairs, and the other for downstairs. Your milage will vary....


Similar ThreadsPosted
Can anyone recommend a decent vacuum cleaner? July 18, 2006, 5:52 pm
Vacuum cleaner November 16, 2006, 6:51 pm
Smelly vacuum cleaner September 24, 2006, 7:20 am
looking for suggestions for vacuum cleaner February 6, 2008, 8:47 pm
Water-reservoir vacuum cleaner July 4, 2005, 8:34 pm
Vacuum cleaner suggestion needed February 9, 2006, 1:22 am
Pressure Vacuum Cleaner for Whole House April 7, 2006, 4:18 pm
help separate vacuum cleaner cover? August 27, 2006, 12:09 pm
Vacuum Cleaner Sucked my Socks January 20, 2007, 9:43 pm
Is there a cordless backpack vacuum cleaner? April 13, 2007, 2:37 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap