Home Page link

Ping Don Klipstein about CFLs

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Ping Don Klipstein about CFLs Andy 04-30-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Andy on April 30, 2008, 8:53 pm
Andy asks:

I have a question about the CFL lamps...


Can they be run from an inverter without a problem ?

I have two types of inverters:

1) An old style square wave inverter

2) A newer style "modified sine wave" inverter...

I'd appreciate any comments and discussion on this... Thanks.

Andy in Eureka, Texas

Posted by Don Klipstein on April 30, 2008, 10:57 pm
Andy wrote:

>Andy asks:
>
> I have a question about the CFL lamps...
>
>Can they be run from an inverter without a problem ?
>
>I have two types of inverters:
>
> 1) An old style square wave inverter
>
> 2) A newer style "modified sine wave" inverter...
>
>I'd appreciate any comments and discussion on this... Thanks.

Modified sine wave inverters produce more of a modified square wave.

The usual low power factor CFLs will run a bit dim from the slightly
lower peak voltage of the modified sine, and more so from the squarewave -
maybe not work too well on a squarewave, with peak voltage of 120V.
Modified sine has a peak voltage of 139 volts, while true sine has a peak
voltage of 170 volts. This largely affects what the circuitry in a usual
low power factor electronic ballasted CFL actually works with.

The peak current through the rectifier and filter capacitor in a usual
low power factor electronic ballast CFL wil be high, from the abrupt
waveform edges from these inverters. I would ask for an engineer at the
CFL manufacturer to find out if this is OK for the CFL - the filter
capacitor or any RF filtering choke will get warmer than normal. Any RFI
filtering choke may also buzz.

You also need to know if the inverter is rated for those.

It's one of those things where I expect it will usually work, but I
can't say for sure that nothing will go KABLOOEY or burn up sometime. I
don't have a good feeling that everything will always be fine-and-dandy!

Maybe better is if the inverter is rated for conventional fluorescents
or ballasted lamps in general, and get either conventional fluorescents
(make sure thay have magnetic ballasts), or CFLs with magnetic ballasts.

Another alternative: Find RV forums and find the good 12V stuff, or
whatever the RV crowd says is good. I am not that in tune with CFLs on
12V inverters or whatever RVers use.

One more little note: There are 12V A19 lightbulbs. Some auto parts
stores have a few of those. They are somewhat more efficient than 120V
ones of the same wattage (50W 12V is almost as bright as 60W 120V), due
to a couple economies of scale from the thicker filament. They may be
where work lights are.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

Posted by David Nebenzahl on April 30, 2008, 11:29 pm
On 4/30/2008 7:57 PM Don Klipstein spake thus:

> The usual low power factor CFLs will run a bit dim from the slightly
> lower peak voltage of the modified sine, and more so from the squarewave -
> maybe not work too well on a squarewave, with peak voltage of 120V.
> Modified sine has a peak voltage of 139 volts, while true sine has a peak
> voltage of 170 volts. This largely affects what the circuitry in a usual
> low power factor electronic ballasted CFL actually works with.
>
> The peak current through the rectifier and filter capacitor in a usual
> low power factor electronic ballast CFL wil be high, from the abrupt
> waveform edges from these inverters. I would ask for an engineer at the
> CFL manufacturer to find out if this is OK for the CFL - the filter
> capacitor or any RF filtering choke will get warmer than normal. Any RFI
> filtering choke may also buzz.

Question (somewhat naive, perhaps, so please bear with me): couldn't a
guy turn square wave current into something closer to sine wave just by
using a bunch of big honking capacitors as a filter? I'm thinking across
the line, but then it occurs to me that if their impedance is too low,
too much current'll flow through them and they'll blow ...


--
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute
conversation with the average voter.

- Attributed to Winston Churchill

Posted by Don Klipstein on May 1, 2008, 9:29 pm
Nebenzahl wrote:
>On 4/30/2008 7:57 PM Don Klipstein spake thus:
>
>> The usual low power factor CFLs will run a bit dim from the slightly
>> lower peak voltage of the modified sine, and more so from the squarewave -
>> maybe not work too well on a squarewave, with peak voltage of 120V.
>> Modified sine has a peak voltage of 139 volts, while true sine has a peak
>> voltage of 170 volts. This largely affects what the circuitry in a usual
>> low power factor electronic ballasted CFL actually works with.
>>
>> The peak current through the rectifier and filter capacitor in a usual
>> low power factor electronic ballast CFL wil be high, from the abrupt
>> waveform edges from these inverters. I would ask for an engineer at the
>> CFL manufacturer to find out if this is OK for the CFL - the filter
>> capacitor or any RF filtering choke will get warmer than normal. Any RFI
>> filtering choke may also buzz.
>
>Question (somewhat naive, perhaps, so please bear with me): couldn't a
>guy turn square wave current into something closer to sine wave just by
>using a bunch of big honking capacitors as a filter? I'm thinking across
>the line, but then it occurs to me that if their impedance is too low,
>too much current'll flow through them and they'll blow ...

I've blown a modified sine inverter in the past with current spikes
drawn by capacitors.

There are LC filters, but those tend to be homebrew and experimental and
things can go wrong. For example, you have to really know what you're
doing to not have them resonate (whether at the fundamental frequency or a
harmonic), or get close enough to resonating to deliver excessive voltage.
I'm sure one not professionally made and rated for use with inverters
would void warranties and safety ratings all over the place. And I don't
know where to get any that are rated for this.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

Posted by David Nebenzahl on May 2, 2008, 12:21 am
On 5/1/2008 6:29 PM Don Klipstein spake thus:

> Nebenzahl wrote:
>
>>On 4/30/2008 7:57 PM Don Klipstein spake thus:
>>
>>> The usual low power factor CFLs will run a bit dim from the slightly
>>> lower peak voltage of the modified sine, and more so from the squarewave -
>>> maybe not work too well on a squarewave, with peak voltage of 120V.
>>> Modified sine has a peak voltage of 139 volts, while true sine has a peak
>>> voltage of 170 volts. This largely affects what the circuitry in a usual
>>> low power factor electronic ballasted CFL actually works with.
>>>
>>> The peak current through the rectifier and filter capacitor in a usual
>>> low power factor electronic ballast CFL wil be high, from the abrupt
>>> waveform edges from these inverters. I would ask for an engineer at the
>>> CFL manufacturer to find out if this is OK for the CFL - the filter
>>> capacitor or any RF filtering choke will get warmer than normal. Any RFI
>>> filtering choke may also buzz.
>>
>>Question (somewhat naive, perhaps, so please bear with me): couldn't a
>>guy turn square wave current into something closer to sine wave just by
>>using a bunch of big honking capacitors as a filter? I'm thinking across
>>the line, but then it occurs to me that if their impedance is too low,
>>too much current'll flow through them and they'll blow ...
>
> I've blown a modified sine inverter in the past with current spikes
> drawn by capacitors.
>
> There are LC filters, but those tend to be homebrew and experimental and
> things can go wrong. For example, you have to really know what you're
> doing to not have them resonate (whether at the fundamental frequency or a
> harmonic), or get close enough to resonating to deliver excessive voltage.
> I'm sure one not professionally made and rated for use with inverters
> would void warranties and safety ratings all over the place. And I don't
> know where to get any that are rated for this.

So are you saying that an LC filter (say, a pi configuration, two caps
and an inductor) *could* work, if one were to select the correct values
of L and C? I understand how one would want to avoid resonance (@60 &
120 Hz) here. Should be simple to do, one would think; not exactly
rocket science.


--
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute
conversation with the average voter.

- Attributed to Winston Churchill

Similar ThreadsPosted
Ping Turtle June 30, 2005, 8:30 am
PING Evan!! January 9, 2006, 7:03 pm
Ping: Oren December 3, 2007, 1:19 pm
Ping Dr. Hardcrab re Goodman A/C January 12, 2006, 4:30 pm
ping: wanna sandwich August 7, 2006, 8:37 am
Off Topic- Ping Dan_Musicant September 21, 2006, 5:43 am
Ping Alan Combellack May 17, 2007, 3:17 pm
PING: avid_hiker RE: was plumbing problem. February 20, 2007, 10:30 am
OT; ping jJim McLaughlin - my reason.. August 9, 2007, 7:45 pm
CFLs January 14, 2007, 3:09 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap