|
Posted by on November 15, 2006, 3:15 pm
Chris Birkett wrote:
> RicodJour wrote:
> > I had asked the OP a question which went unanswered. It gets to the
> > root of the matter. If the father felt comfortable letting the
> > contractor work unsupervised while he was out of the country, and
> > agreed that additional work needed to be done due to unforeseen
> > conditions, why is the son getting involved? Is he "protecting" his
> > father or just sticking his two cents into something he doesn't
> > understand?
>
> The real root of the matter is that he DIDN'T agree to pay for
> additional work. I don't see how my motivation affects this.
>
> > You will not get complete information from the son, as it's his opinion
> > that the work was unnecessary and it's only one side of the story.
> > Besides that, he wasn't part of the agreement. Did you wonder why the
> > father didn't tag the son to be the supervision while he was away?
> > Kind of curious, no?
>
> I don't understand why this bothers you so much. When did I say the
> work was unnecessary? As it stands, the extra charge has not been
> justified at all, and the work has not even been completed to
> satisfaction. I *was* dealing with the repair people while he was
> gone, and additional costs were never mentioned. Both my mother and I
> were readily available to discuss it on any of the several days they
> were here, and they knew my dad was available by e-mail.
>
> Chris
Lots of sound and fury about not-much here, eh? Let's wrap this up-
ask your dad to work this out with the tradesman, one-on-one, and
maybe info us on the resolution.
We all go through learning experiences, maybe even learn something.
J
|