Home Page link

Re: Are we the only ones getting screwed ?????

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 5 of 11       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Are we the only ones getting screwed ????? Steve 03-29-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Kurt Ullman on April 3, 2008, 4:09 pm
gfretwell@aol.com wrote:

>
> Trains make sense here where the right of way already exists, the
> track is in reasonable condition and the population centers are very
> close together. That eliminates about 90% of the US geography.

yeah but not near 90% of the metric that is important.. number of
trips. Most interstates are mostly populated by area residents not by
people going large distances. You could (at least in theory) take many
people off the road with a good system. Also some interstate. I'd love
to be able to get to Louisville or Cincy or Chicago from Indy by other
than car or plane.

Posted by on April 3, 2008, 10:33 pm
wrote:

> gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Trains make sense here where the right of way already exists, the
>> track is in reasonable condition and the population centers are very
>> close together. That eliminates about 90% of the US geography.
>
> yeah but not near 90% of the metric that is important.. number of
>trips. Most interstates are mostly populated by area residents not by
>people going large distances. You could (at least in theory) take many
>people off the road with a good system. Also some interstate. I'd love
>to be able to get to Louisville or Cincy or Chicago from Indy by other
>than car or plane.

I'm sure the tracks go there. If people would ride a passenger train,
somebody would run one.

Posted by Kurt Ullman on April 3, 2008, 11:18 pm
gfretwell@aol.com wrote:

>
> I'm sure the tracks go there. If people would ride a passenger train,
> somebody would run one.

Go to the area, but few go on downtown. Although the other problem is
that the major players (CSX, NS, etc) generally view passengers as more
trouble than they are worth. Even if someone else was going to run it,
the RR that owns the track still has to crew it (at least that was the
case a few years when I was involved with a museum that also ran steam
loco trips). They have to work the newbie around their regular trains
(hard enough to get them to do for singleton trips, I can only imagine
the gnashing of teeth associated with multiple trips). Insurance. All
sorts of reason.

Posted by Larry Caldwell on April 11, 2008, 10:11 am
gfretwell@aol.com (gfretwell@aol.com) says...

> How fast do they really run?
>
> I know the Metroliner DC-NYC always talked about fantastic speeds, it
> ran about 70 most of the time.

I spent 3 months in Europe on a Eurail pass in 1986. I never got on the
high speed trains, but the typical commuter train ran about 80 in
between stations. Express trains didn't go much faster, they just
didn't stop as often. The real advantage of rail travel over air is the
comfort. Air travel is an ordeal, rail travel is a pleasure.

> You couldn't build the interstate system today. It would never get out
> of the environmental impact phase.

In areas with expanding population, they are building new freeways all
the time.

> Trains make sense here where the right of way already exists, the
> track is in reasonable condition and the population centers are very
> close together. That eliminates about 90% of the US geography.
> The reality is the US has a lot more airline infrastructure in place
> than railroad infrasructure. I doubt we have really laid any new track
> on new right of way since WWII. Except for some passenger rail in the
> NE corridor, most of the track in place is the old bolted rail, not
> the precision welded rail you need for fast trains. Whenever we have
> really tried fast trains they end up crashing and the US citizens have
> little tolerance for crashes.
> I doubt security would be much different than the airport as soon as
> the first guy blows up or derails a train.

The USA is still running on the remnants of 19th century rails. I
believe about 40% of the rail lines that existed in 1900 have been
abandoned. Even the main rail corridors are, in many places, a single
pair of rails.

The impetus to rebuild US rail structure will not come from passenger
service. Long haul motor trucking is convenient, but uses several times
as much energy and labor as rail shipping. At current energy prices,
motor freight is only surviving because rail capacity is not available.
Terminals were designed for men using hand trucks, and switching yards
are a congested mess where cars can get lost for a month at a time.
When the system gets rebuilt to handle freight efficiently, adding
passenger service will be a minor upgrade.

--
For email, replace firstnamelastinitial
with my first name and last initial.

Posted by dpb on April 11, 2008, 10:58 am
Larry Caldwell wrote:
...
> I spent 3 months in Europe on a Eurail pass in 1986. I never got on the
> high speed trains, but the typical commuter train ran about 80 in
> between stations. Express trains didn't go much faster, they just
> didn't stop as often. The real advantage of rail travel over air is the
> comfort. Air travel is an ordeal, rail travel is a pleasure.
...

We took the "Chunnel" across the channel to/return Paris/London in '99 I
believe was last time.

It runs max of 100+ but on the time we were on had speed restrictions of
<30 for track conditions in an area (I forget just where). So, even
there they still have maintenance issues...

--

Page 5 of 11       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
I think I screwed up July 4, 2007, 9:37 am
Re: Are we the only ones getting screwed ????? March 28, 2008, 10:15 pm
Re: Are we the only ones getting screwed ????? March 28, 2008, 10:37 pm
Re: Are we the only ones getting screwed ????? March 29, 2008, 2:59 pm
Re: Are we the only ones getting screwed ????? March 29, 2008, 3:02 pm
Re: Are we the only ones getting screwed ????? March 31, 2008, 6:26 pm
Re: Are we the only ones getting screwed ????? April 16, 2008, 12:35 am
Why Screwed By Heat? May 16, 2006, 4:21 am
i think we screwed up the jacuzzi plz help June 25, 2007, 6:14 pm
Fridge icemaker screwed up December 8, 2005, 1:09 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap