Home Page link

Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural gas? What about NG-powered AC compressor?

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 2 of 5       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural gas? What about NG-powered AC compressor? Chris Lewis 12-06-2005
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Tony Wesley on December 6, 2005, 5:30 pm

Chris Lewis wrote:
> If you had kicked the Brits, Indians, and Canadians, we would be a state.
>
> You lost that war, remember? Oh, I forgot, the Americans claim that they
> won that one.

Let's see, we got England to stop boarding ships and impressing the
crew into their navy, plus England finally recognized the USA. Plus,
England gave up some land that had formerly been considered part of
Canada. It wasn't Drummond's Island anymore.

> Militarily, we had the edge at the end (we held parts of the US).
> Politically, it was a draw (the Brits gave those parts back [+]).

If you read the treaties that ended the two wars with England, you'll
know that 1812 wasn't a draw.

> But, from the perspective of what the intent of the American invaders _was_
> (take over Canada to "free" us from the British oppression, which we happened
> to _like_ ;-), you blew it big time.

American invaders? The "invasion" was the other way, the Brits taking
Mackinac Island first.


PexSupply QuikTrak 468x60
Posted by John P.. Bengi on December 6, 2005, 5:36 pm
The Americans tried to take back Mackinac three times
unsuccessfully. In the end we gave it to them for
political gain.

>
> Chris Lewis wrote:
> > If you had kicked the Brits, Indians, and
Canadians, we would be a state.
> >
> > You lost that war, remember? Oh, I forgot, the
Americans claim that they
> > won that one.
>
> Let's see, we got England to stop boarding ships and
impressing the
> crew into their navy, plus England finally recognized
the USA. Plus,
> England gave up some land that had formerly been
considered part of
> Canada. It wasn't Drummond's Island anymore.
>
> > Militarily, we had the edge at the end (we held
parts of the US).
> > Politically, it was a draw (the Brits gave those
parts back [+]).
>
> If you read the treaties that ended the two wars with
England, you'll
> know that 1812 wasn't a draw.
>
> > But, from the perspective of what the intent of the
American invaders _was_
> > (take over Canada to "free" us from the British
oppression, which we happened
> > to _like_ ;-), you blew it big time.
>
> American invaders? The "invasion" was the other way,
the Brits taking
> Mackinac Island first.
>



Posted by Oscar_Lives on December 6, 2005, 9:34 pm

> The Americans tried to take back Mackinac three times
> unsuccessfully. In the end we gave it to them for
> political gain.
>


Canada didn't want it. It was too fricken cold there.



Posted by Chris Lewis on December 6, 2005, 7:19 pm
>
> Chris Lewis wrote:
> > If you had kicked the Brits, Indians, and Canadians, we would be a state.

> > You lost that war, remember? Oh, I forgot, the Americans claim that they
> > won that one.

> Let's see, we got England to stop boarding ships and impressing the
> crew into their navy, plus England finally recognized the USA.

That happened two days _before_ the Americans declared war.

Read the history: http://gatewayno.com/history/War1812.html

> Plus,
> England gave up some land that had formerly been considered part of
> Canada. It wasn't Drummond's Island anymore.

> > Militarily, we had the edge at the end (we held parts of the US).
> > Politically, it was a draw (the Brits gave those parts back [+]).

> If you read the treaties that ended the two wars with England, you'll
> know that 1812 wasn't a draw.

Back to http://gatewayno.com/history/War1812.html:

- U.S. forces were not ready for war, and American hopes of conquering Canada
collapsed
in the campaigns of 1812 and 1813.

H'm. "Hopes to conquer Canada collapsed". So, what you started the war over
was obsolete by the time war was declared, you didn't conquer Canada, and
the land possession hardly changed if at all.

A draw.

> > But, from the perspective of what the intent of the American invaders _was_
> > (take over Canada to "free" us from the British oppression, which we happened
> > to _like_ ;-), you blew it big time.

> American invaders? The "invasion" was the other way, the Brits taking
> Mackinac Island first.

We were supposed to sit around twiddling our thumbs after you declared war on us?

Back to that same link again:

- They argued that American honor could be saved and British policies changed
by an invasion of Canada.

[Remembering of course that British policies had already been changed.]
--
Chris Lewis, Una confibula non set est
It's not just anyone who gets a Starship Cruiser class named after them.

Posted by mike wilcox on December 6, 2005, 7:38 pm
Chris Lewis wrote:

>
>>Chris Lewis wrote:
>>
>>>If you had kicked the Brits, Indians, and Canadians, we would be a state.
>
>
>>>You lost that war, remember? Oh, I forgot, the Americans claim that they
>>>won that one.
>
>
>
>>Let's see, we got England to stop boarding ships and impressing the
>>crew into their navy, plus England finally recognized the USA.
>
>
> That happened two days _before_ the Americans declared war.
>
> Read the history: http://gatewayno.com/history/War1812.html
>
>
>>Plus,
>>England gave up some land that had formerly been considered part of
>>Canada. It wasn't Drummond's Island anymore.
>
>
>>>Militarily, we had the edge at the end (we held parts of the US).
>>>Politically, it was a draw (the Brits gave those parts back [+]).
>
>
>
>>If you read the treaties that ended the two wars with England, you'll
>>know that 1812 wasn't a draw.
>
>
> Back to http://gatewayno.com/history/War1812.html:
>
> - U.S. forces were not ready for war, and American hopes of conquering Canada
collapsed
> in the campaigns of 1812 and 1813.
>
> H'm. "Hopes to conquer Canada collapsed". So, what you started the war over
> was obsolete by the time war was declared, you didn't conquer Canada, and
> the land possession hardly changed if at all.
>
> A draw.
>
>
>>>But, from the perspective of what the intent of the American invaders _was_
>>>(take over Canada to "free" us from the British oppression, which we happened
>>>to _like_ ;-), you blew it big time.
>
>
>
>>American invaders? The "invasion" was the other way, the Brits taking
>>Mackinac Island first.
>
>
> We were supposed to sit around twiddling our thumbs after you declared war on
us?
>
> Back to that same link again:
>
> - They argued that American honor could be saved and British policies changed
> by an invasion of Canada.
>
> [Remembering of course that British policies had already been changed.]

The Americans were still trying to take over Canada as late as 1866.

Page 2 of 5       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural gas? What about NG-powered AC compressor? December 4, 2005, 9:48 am
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural gas? What about NG-powered AC compressor? December 4, 2005, 12:57 pm
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural gas? What about NG-powered AC compressor? December 5, 2005, 4:04 am
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural gas? What about NG-powered AC compressor? December 27, 2005, 10:03 pm
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural gas? What about NG-powered AC compressor? December 6, 2005, 9:00 am
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural... December 4, 2005, 6:40 am
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural... December 4, 2005, 6:39 am
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural... December 4, 2005, 10:47 am
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural... December 4, 2005, 12:22 pm
Re: Break-even point for home electric generator powered by natural... December 5, 2005, 6:48 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap