|
Posted by mike wilcox on December 6, 2005, 7:38 pm
Chris Lewis wrote:
>
>>Chris Lewis wrote:
>>
>>>If you had kicked the Brits, Indians, and Canadians, we would be a state.
>
>
>>>You lost that war, remember? Oh, I forgot, the Americans claim that they
>>>won that one.
>
>
>
>>Let's see, we got England to stop boarding ships and impressing the
>>crew into their navy, plus England finally recognized the USA.
>
>
> That happened two days _before_ the Americans declared war.
>
> Read the history: http://gatewayno.com/history/War1812.html
>
>
>>Plus,
>>England gave up some land that had formerly been considered part of
>>Canada. It wasn't Drummond's Island anymore.
>
>
>>>Militarily, we had the edge at the end (we held parts of the US).
>>>Politically, it was a draw (the Brits gave those parts back [+]).
>
>
>
>>If you read the treaties that ended the two wars with England, you'll
>>know that 1812 wasn't a draw.
>
>
> Back to http://gatewayno.com/history/War1812.html:
>
> - U.S. forces were not ready for war, and American hopes of conquering Canada
collapsed
> in the campaigns of 1812 and 1813.
>
> H'm. "Hopes to conquer Canada collapsed". So, what you started the war over
> was obsolete by the time war was declared, you didn't conquer Canada, and
> the land possession hardly changed if at all.
>
> A draw.
>
>
>>>But, from the perspective of what the intent of the American invaders _was_
>>>(take over Canada to "free" us from the British oppression, which we happened
>>>to _like_ ;-), you blew it big time.
>
>
>
>>American invaders? The "invasion" was the other way, the Brits taking
>>Mackinac Island first.
>
>
> We were supposed to sit around twiddling our thumbs after you declared war on
us?
>
> Back to that same link again:
>
> - They argued that American honor could be saved and British policies changed
> by an invasion of Canada.
>
> [Remembering of course that British policies had already been changed.]
The Americans were still trying to take over Canada as late as 1866.
|