|
Posted by HeyBub on May 20, 2008, 12:33 pm
Banty wrote:
> says...
>>
>> Cheri wrote:
>>> HeyBub wrote in message ...
>>>
>>>> Why not? Same a building a fence - the neighbor is responsible for
>>>> half the cost (unless they demur) under the principle of unjust
>>>> enrichment. This is black-letter law.
>>>>
>>>> If she doesn't pay, take her to small claims court, sue her and
>>>> everybody she ever knew. Levy & execute. Get a lien on her house.
>>>> Confiscate her cat.
>>>>
>>>> Teach the old biddy she's done farked with the wrong Marine!
>>>
>>> She is not responsible for his gutters. Period.
>>>
>>
>> Irrelevant. The gutters are merely the mechanism to extract
>> retaliation, vengeance, and retribution. Justice is blind.
>>
>> People go to jail for what can be proved, not for what they did.
>> Often, what they did cannot be proved and what is proved is not what
>> they did. That's why there are so many "innocent" people in prison.
>>
>>
>
> !!?!
>
> How did retribution get into this?
>
> Chris asked how to deal with the need to gain temporary access to a
> small part of the property of a neighbor with an uncooperative
> history with him. Period. He didn't ask how to get back at her,
> practical and sane guy he seems to be. He wants gutters. That's all.
Oh. Okay. I was viewing the episode as an opportunity to visit wrath on the
neighborhood witch.
My bad.
|