Home Page link

Remove 13 ft. bearing wall - Beam choices?

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 5 of 6       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Remove 13 ft. bearing wall - Beam choices? Bill 04-24-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by David Nebenzahl on April 25, 2008, 3:23 am
On 4/24/2008 10:46 PM Smitty Two spake thus:

> One thing I don't see discussed very often on ahr is sheer strength.
> AIUI, houses with a lot of doors and windows often use an interior wall
> not only for load bearing, but also for sheer. It's worth considering.
> When I added a window and a pocket closet door in the bedroom, I had to
> make sheer strength modifications to what was left of the walls.

I think you meant to type "shear". But your points stand.


--
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute
conversation with the average voter.

- Attributed to Winston Churchill

Posted by Smitty Two on April 25, 2008, 10:39 am

> On 4/24/2008 10:46 PM Smitty Two spake thus:
>
> > One thing I don't see discussed very often on ahr is sheer strength.
> > AIUI, houses with a lot of doors and windows often use an interior wall
> > not only for load bearing, but also for sheer. It's worth considering.
> > When I added a window and a pocket closet door in the bedroom, I had to
> > make sheer strength modifications to what was left of the walls.
>
> I think you meant to type "shear". But your points stand.

Yep, thanks. Not too many homonyms fool me, and that's a bad one to get
wrong since it changes the meaning of the word. Shear it is, and I'll
remember it.

Posted by dpb on April 24, 2008, 4:22 pm
Robert Allison wrote:
> dpb wrote:
>
>> Robert Allison wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> When I do things like this on my own, I always overengineer, because
>>> I cannot properly do the calculations, so I overbuild to compensate.
>>> ...
>>
>>
>> If you don't do the calculations, how do you know you're
>> "over"-engineered?
>>
>> :)
>>
>> --
>
> I can do the calculations on alot of things, but, from my experience,
> anything I design gets downsized if an engineer looks at it. ...

You miss the smiley? Hope not... :) It was only intended as a joke,
not an aspersion...

--

Posted by Robert Allison on April 24, 2008, 5:32 pm
dpb wrote:
> Robert Allison wrote:
>
>> dpb wrote:
>>
>>> Robert Allison wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> When I do things like this on my own, I always overengineer, because
>>>> I cannot properly do the calculations, so I overbuild to
>>>> compensate. ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you don't do the calculations, how do you know you're
>>> "over"-engineered?
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>> --
>>
>>
>> I can do the calculations on alot of things, but, from my experience,
>> anything I design gets downsized if an engineer looks at it. ...
>
>
> You miss the smiley? Hope not... :) It was only intended as a joke,
> not an aspersion...
>
> --

No, I saw it. I just wanted to be clear to everyone else. I
figured that you knew what I was talking about!

--
Robert Allison
Rimshot, Inc.
Georgetown, TX

Posted by BobK207 on April 24, 2008, 11:06 pm
> Bill wrote:
> > Before I go and hire an architect, get building permit, etc. I would lik=
e to
> > get a ballpark on what this might look like...
>
> > I have a bearing wall (2x4 studs) which is 13 ft. long in my living room=

> > which I am thinking of tearing out and replacing with a beam. (2 story
> > house - living room first floor.)
>
> > But looking at "span tables", this is looking like it would need a solid=

> > wood beam like 4 x 10? Well a 10" beam would come down a bit far and not=

> > look so good...
>
> > So how about a steel I-beam? I looked at span tables for I-beams and it
> > looks like a "W6x9" would do the trick? This would come down less and lo=
ok
> > better.
>
> > Anyway I don't know a thing about steel I-beams. Does "W6x9" mean 6 inch=
es
> > wide and 9 inches high?
>
> No, W6x9 means that it is 6 lbs per foot and nine inches tall.
>
> > Is there a smaller I-beam which would work for this span?
>
> An engineered wood beam multiplied may do it, but you would have
> to check with the span tables for them.
>
> > And I have 2x4 walls that this I-beam would connect to on each side. Wou=
ld
> > the I-beam just rest on say 4 x 6 wood posts? Or have holes drilled in t=
he
> > bottom of the I-beam and lag screw it to the wood posts?
>
> Typically, a metal beam on a wood post would have clips welded
> onto it to fasten to the support posts. =A0There are various ways
> of attachment.
>
> > And how would I fasten the joists resting on the top of the I-beam to th=
e
> > I -beam?
>
> This would again entail clips either welded or bolted to the beam
> and fastened to the joists.
>
> As other posters have pointed out, you must make sure to transfer
> the load to your foundation appropriately. =A0It does not sound
> like you have the experience to judge all the possible
> configurations for doing this properly. =A0An engineer can well
> make this project doable and keep within a budget for doing so.
>
> When I do things like this on my own, I always overengineer,
> because I cannot properly do the calculations, so I overbuild to
> compensate. =A0The engineer can save you money by specifying
> enough, without overdoing it. =A0The cost of the engineer can often
> be saved by the savings from less material and less work. =A0YMMV.
>
> As far as what it will cost, if you do the legwork (make accurate
> drawings, take a lot of photos of both the foundation under the
> support posts and the floor above and the situation itself) then
> the engineer can design a system for you without having to do all
> of that himself. =A0Design costs; =A0probably 300 to 500 bucks if it
> is simple. =A0Build costs; =A0depends, but if it is simple and the
> foundation can support everything as it is, then 1,000 bucks or so.
>
> Well worth the piece of mind to hire the engineer. =A0He sees
> things that you can't.
>
> --
> Robert Allison
> Rimshot, Inc.
> Georgetown, TX




> > Anyway I don't know a thing about steel I-beams. Does "W6x9" mean 6 inch=
es
> > wide and 9 inches high?
>
> No, W6x9 means that it is 6 lbs per foot and nine inches tall.

Unless someone else has fielded this

W6x9 means a wide flange beam nominally 6" deep & weighing 9 lbs/ft

cheers
Bob

Page 5 of 6       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Choices for load bearing columns? August 8, 2005, 5:51 pm
This couldn't be a load bearing wall, could it? September 27, 2005, 3:35 pm
Load bearing wall December 26, 2007, 7:50 pm
Load Bearing Wall Question March 28, 2006, 11:15 am
Load bearing wall vs. shelves August 31, 2006, 1:16 pm
Load bearing wall removal question? February 25, 2007, 9:01 pm
Door framing in load-bearing wall June 18, 2007, 10:06 pm
Moving a [possibly bearing] knee wall.. little help here.. August 31, 2007, 4:14 pm
Guys, quick, is this a load bearing wall? January 22, 2008, 1:07 pm
French Drain through Load Bearing Wall? March 30, 2008, 2:59 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap