|
Posted by BobR on November 14, 2007, 3:52 pm
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:28:49 -0500, Mark Lloyd
>
>
>
>
>
> >wrote:
>
> >>On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:21:06 -0700, "hall...@aol.com"
>
> >>>providers call and ask for unique numbers from each box they change by
> >>>satellite, if you cant walk around your home and give them numbers
> >>>from each box you get shut down.
>
> >>>doing thisa is the same as going in a store and stealing merchandise
>
> >>No it is not. If you steal something from a store then the store no
> >>longer has it.
>
> >>It is NOT the same thing.
>
> >Right. Is it even something wrong?
>
> >1. You paid (the sat company) to see the game. Didn't you?
>
> >2. The sat signal is already available both places. The losses
> >experienced by the provider are not affected by WHERE you are when you
> >watch the game.
>
> >I think that idea of it being "stealing" is corporate propaganda,
> >repeated by people who haven't really thought about it themselves.
>
> >Some people are going to be saying something like "your local stadium
> >lost a ticket sale because of it". Then what the [expletive deleted]
> >are they doing with YOUR money, so as to be able to lose it.
>
> The RIAA is going after people making copies of mp3's while 2 million
> people are crossing the border illegally each year. It boggles my
> little mind.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I just love the old tried and proven but remains stupid as ever
argument that somehow my sin is the lesser sin so therefore it should
be excused. BOTH are wrong and both deserve to be treated as wrong.
You can not excuse your act based on anothers act no matter how hard
you might try. WRONG is WRONG!
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap