|
Posted by KLS on November 21, 2008, 6:23 pm
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:43:38 -0500, "Percival P. Cassidy"
show/hide quoted text
>Here in W. Michigan, our township has two separate charges based on
>water consumption: one is for its supply, the other for its disposal.
>This has the disadvantage of charging the sewage-treatment fee on the
>water that in fact gets sprinkled on our lawns, but we offset that to
>some extent by using low-flush toilets and even then flushing as
>infrequently as possible.
Now *THIS* is a brilliant idea. I need to propose it to my municipal
water utility!
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
> http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24670784-2,00.html
> Bob-tx