|
Posted by Mark Lloyd on October 8, 2006, 8:22 pm
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 10:26:31 -0700, "Eigenvector"
>
>> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 10:49:45 -0500, Mark Lloyd
>>>>
>>>
>>>Understanding binary can save you a lot of work (too often people
>>>would try one breaker at a time, rather than doing it by halves).
>>>
>> I am not sure exactly how this is going to save any time. If you are
>> standing at the panel listening for the radio, you can switch one at
>> a time and find it sooner.
>>
>> What if the breaker was the first one? How would turning half off
>> save time?
>>
>> If the breaker is one in the second half then you have already turned
>> off half the panel using both examples.
>>
>> Understanding common sense can save you a lot to work too.
>>
>
>Doesn't it also matter how many breakers you have in your box too. I have 8
>breakers total, 2 are double pull and obviously not for outlets, so that
>leaves six, not exactly difficult nor time consuming to kill 6 breakers and
>figure out which goes where. Using binary would be ludicrous in that
>situation.
>
"ludicrous" makes it sound like using binary is much more work. That's
incorrect.
The average is 3 for either method. If you consider maximum (as
someone might), you get 3 (for binary) or 6 (for one at a time).
I'd still check everything and label the breakers properly.
|