Home Page link

Type of fire extinguisher for home use?

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 5 of 6       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Type of fire extinguisher for home use? Daniel Prince 04-01-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Oren on April 4, 2008, 6:32 pm
wrote:

>salty@dog.com wrote:
>> wrote:
>>
>>> salty@dog.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have several small ABC Kiddie fire extinguishers. Most are mounted
>>>>> near an exterior door. I have one in the kitchen, basement shop,
>>>>> garage, and truck. The pressure dial shows the extinguisher has
>>>>> pressure and should be periodically inspected. An open box of
>>>>> baking soda near the stove is very effective for grease fires. The
>>>>> thing to keep in mind is to have the extinguishers ready and easily
>>>>> accessible. Hopefully, you won't ever have to use one.
>>>> Here's another good tip: Every month or so, take each extinguisher off its
>>>> bracket and shake it vigorously until you can hear the powder moving
inside. If
>>>> they hand for long periods, the gauge will still say they are good, but the
>>>> powder will haved settled itself into a solid lump and the extinguisher
will not
>>>> work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It takes a lot longer then a month for the chemical to compact to a non
>>> flowing state. Follow the instructions on the label that contains the
>>> listing mark. You only need to take it off of the hook once every six
>>> months. You then simply invert it and wait for the powder to fall
>>> loosely to the top of the cylinder. You can feel the powder drop. Do
>>> not pound or shake! If the powder doesn't fall loose on it's own the
>>> extinguisher should be serviced or replaced. Turn the extinguisher
>>> right side up and put it back on the bracket.
>>
>> So, you are claiming that stirring up the powder more frequently to
>> PREVENT it from caking is not as good as waiting to do it until after
>> it already starts to settle and cake? Okay!
>>
>
>I'm saying that the powder will not cake in that short a time unless
>there is something wrong with it. Some examples of the something wrong
>are moisture in the cylinder, mixing of incompatible powders, or over
>charging of the unit with too much chemical.
>
>Shaking the extinguisher seems to make sense at the intuitive level but
>it is not, in fact, best practice. By shaking the extinguisher you may
>break up the caking into lumps that will plug the nozzle orifice during
>use preventing the extinguisher from discharging at the point when you
>need it most.
>
>By doing as I've described you have an opportunity to detect a problem
>with the extinguisher prior to a need arising. If you shake or bang the
>extinguisher around you are more likely to conceal a defect then you are
>to clear one.
>
>I base this on three years of work as a fire extinguisher technician in
>California were the fire code requires that all extinguishers be torn
>down annually instead of at the National Fire Protection Association
>recommended interval of six years. During that time I found many
>extinguishers that had been rendered inoperative by an incompetent
>service technician's work the previous year but I never found one
>inoperative due to chemical caking except were the extinguisher had been
>improperly charged with damp air rather then dry nitrogen and when
>incompatible chemicals had been mixed. I serviced literally several
>thousand extinguishers during that period. I have been involved in the
>fire and rescue service in many capacities since that time. I've
>personally inspected hundreds of fire extinguishers using the method
>I've suggested. I've found two, that I can recall, were the powder
>would not fall of it's own weight and both were in need of servicing. I
>only did the follow up work on one of them and found that the
>extinguisher had been improperly charged with incompatible chemicals.
>On the other one the follow up was done by the Fire Marshall's office
>because it involved a day care center. I never heard what the cause of
>that one needing service was. I do know that during subsequent company
>in service inspections of that premise that extinguisher behaved as it
>should have with the powder falling loose of it's own weight.
>
>It's just a suggestion sir. Do it however you like but you won't find
>one manufacturers recommendation or one set of "labeled" maintenance
>instructions that directs the shaking or striking of the extinguisher.

Thanks for posting.

I've inspected thousands of extinguishers over years and years. They
had vanilla cards; dates and initials were required for the inspection
date. We followed the safety managers policy. Never once did we shake
a unit. They were rotated as necessary.


PexSupply PEX Tools 468x60
Posted by on April 4, 2008, 6:46 pm

>salty@dog.com wrote:
>> wrote:
>>
>>> salty@dog.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have several small ABC Kiddie fire extinguishers. Most are mounted
>>>>> near an exterior door. I have one in the kitchen, basement shop,
>>>>> garage, and truck. The pressure dial shows the extinguisher has
>>>>> pressure and should be periodically inspected. An open box of
>>>>> baking soda near the stove is very effective for grease fires. The
>>>>> thing to keep in mind is to have the extinguishers ready and easily
>>>>> accessible. Hopefully, you won't ever have to use one.
>>>> Here's another good tip: Every month or so, take each extinguisher off its
>>>> bracket and shake it vigorously until you can hear the powder moving
inside. If
>>>> they hand for long periods, the gauge will still say they are good, but the
>>>> powder will haved settled itself into a solid lump and the extinguisher
will not
>>>> work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It takes a lot longer then a month for the chemical to compact to a non
>>> flowing state. Follow the instructions on the label that contains the
>>> listing mark. You only need to take it off of the hook once every six
>>> months. You then simply invert it and wait for the powder to fall
>>> loosely to the top of the cylinder. You can feel the powder drop. Do
>>> not pound or shake! If the powder doesn't fall loose on it's own the
>>> extinguisher should be serviced or replaced. Turn the extinguisher
>>> right side up and put it back on the bracket.
>>
>> So, you are claiming that stirring up the powder more frequently to
>> PREVENT it from caking is not as good as waiting to do it until after
>> it already starts to settle and cake? Okay!
>>
>
>I'm saying that the powder will not cake in that short a time unless
>there is something wrong with it. Some examples of the something wrong
>are moisture in the cylinder, mixing of incompatible powders, or over
>charging of the unit with too much chemical.
>
>Shaking the extinguisher seems to make sense at the intuitive level but
>it is not, in fact, best practice. By shaking the extinguisher you may
>break up the caking into lumps that will plug the nozzle orifice during
>use preventing the extinguisher from discharging at the point when you
>need it most.
>

That sounds like a very convincing argument for shaking the extinguisher as
often as practical. That way, you won't have to worry about those pesky,
troublesome lumps ever forming.

>By doing as I've described you have an opportunity to detect a problem
>with the extinguisher prior to a need arising. If you shake or bang the
>extinguisher around you are more likely to conceal a defect then you are
>to clear one.
>
>I base this on three years of work as a fire extinguisher technician in
>California were the fire code requires that all extinguishers be torn
>down annually instead of at the National Fire Protection Association
>recommended interval of six years. During that time I found many
>extinguishers that had been rendered inoperative by an incompetent
>service technician's work the previous year but I never found one
>inoperative due to chemical caking except were the extinguisher had been
>improperly charged with damp air rather then dry nitrogen and when
>incompatible chemicals had been mixed. I serviced literally several
>thousand extinguishers during that period. I have been involved in the
>fire and rescue service in many capacities since that time. I've
>personally inspected hundreds of fire extinguishers using the method
>I've suggested. I've found two, that I can recall, were the powder
>would not fall of it's own weight and both were in need of servicing. I
>only did the follow up work on one of them and found that the
>extinguisher had been improperly charged with incompatible chemicals.
>On the other one the follow up was done by the Fire Marshall's office
>because it involved a day care center. I never heard what the cause of
>that one needing service was. I do know that during subsequent company
>in service inspections of that premise that extinguisher behaved as it
>should have with the powder falling loose of it's own weight.
>

The extinguishers we are discussing here are HOME extinguishers, not commercial
extinguishers. They are not serviced either properly or improperly. They get
replaced when the cheap little gauge is no longer pointing to the green wedge.

>It's just a suggestion sir. Do it however you like but you won't find
>one manufacturers recommendation or one set of "labeled" maintenance
>instructions that directs the shaking or striking of the extinguisher.

In a matter of seconds I can find tens of thousands of website pages that
recommend that dry chemical extinguishers should be turned upside down and
shaken MONTHLY. These sites include many government agencies, large non-profit
organizations with an interest in safety, fire prevention departments of cities
large and small, and commercial websites.

Try a google search for yourself. Here's one that gets well 16000 hits using the
serach terms fire extinguisher" "maintenance" "shake"

<http://www.google.com/search?q=%22fire+extinguisher%22+%22maintenance%22+%22shake%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a>


Posted by Stormin Mormon on April 3, 2008, 11:41 pm
I like to turn the dry chem types upside down, and shake the heck out of
them to keep the powder loose. Makes me look like a nut, I'm sure.

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.



Here's another good tip: Every month or so, take each extinguisher off its
bracket and shake it vigorously until you can hear the powder moving inside.
If
they hand for long periods, the gauge will still say they are good, but the
powder will haved settled itself into a solid lump and the extinguisher will
not
work.




Posted by Oren on April 1, 2008, 6:14 pm
wrote:

>Throughout school and employment, I've attended safety sessions which
>have included how to
>use an extinguisher. Awfully valuable info, IMO. You don't aim INTO
>burning liquid because
>you want to avoid splashing it. You aim across the top so's to kill the
>O2 supply at the surface.

Take a peek at your fire extinguisher. Aim at the base of the fire;
using sweeping motions.

That was the was I was trained in office safety classes.

The other was to use the correct type for the fire - ya don't put
liquid type on and electrical fire....


Posted by Jim Redelfs on April 1, 2008, 9:30 am

> I have read or seen on TV that one should use fire extinguishers
> that have a hose attached to the outlet because they are easier to
> aim.

I agree.

> My brother said that a safety expert at his workplace says
> that one should not use a fire extinguisher larger than a 1A 10BC
> for home use because larger ones would blow the fire (or burning
> grease) around.

I hope your brother misunderstood the safety expert. It has been my
experience that the discharge RATE or "strength" is about the same for
the smaller units as it is for the larger ones.

> The only fire extinguishers that have hoses seem to be 3A 40BC or
> larger. Which type should we get?

Get the larger one. In fact, based on FIRST HAND experience, I highly
recommend that you get as large an extinguisher (ABC-type) as you can.
The larger models are of a higher quality, too.

The little ones are just that: Little. They are too little to be
effective on all but the smallest fire. You would be surprised to learn
how quickly they empty.

In the case of my aforementioned first hand experience, a "little" fire
extinguisher made a very nice, small "hole" in the fire. This
conflagration required the fire department but convinced me of the LACK
of effectiveness of the small extinguisher. They have their place (RV,
boat, kitchen wall, etc) but, if you are purchasing your first
extinguisher, you should get a large one and keep it in a central part
of the home, near an exit.

Good luck. I hope you never HAVE to use it.
--
:)
JR

Page 5 of 6       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Fire extinguisher gas. September 19, 2008, 6:05 pm
Cannot fine chimney fire extinguisher anywhere August 30, 2005, 6:47 pm
life expectancy of fire extinguisher? November 17, 2006, 5:32 pm
Chimney Fire Extinguisher Sticks April 17, 2008, 9:34 pm
What are the best gifts for Home Improvement type people November 11, 2007, 12:47 pm
Getting Online Help During a Major Home Fire December 30, 2007, 8:27 am
Home plumbing: Copper VS plastic-type pipes May 2, 2007, 2:33 am
Circuit Breakers: Murray Type MP-T vs. Siemens Type QP October 1, 2005, 9:01 pm
Home destroyed by electrical fire (caused by malfunction in a tankless electric water heater) April 2, 2008, 3:07 am
Anyone link a fire alarm to the fire department WITHOUT going through a 3rd party? September 14, 2005, 3:08 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap