If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by salty on October 17, 2009, 4:17 pm
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:16:19 -0700 (PDT), RicodJour
show/hide quoted text
>wrote:
>> Sum Guy wrote:
>> > Are the Dyson vacuum cleaners as good as they say they are?
>> > Are they worthy of the tv-commercial air time? Or is this a case of "if
>> > you advertize it, they will buy" ?
>> They are just trying to justify a high price. Some people will buy
>> something just because it costs more.
>Curious that you have such a strong opinion on something you don't
>own. Virtually all of the reviews from people that actually bought it
>are 4 and 5 stars (Dyson Animal). Google has a review consolidator -
>click on the "all reviews" link.
>R
It's not uncommon for people to like what they bought. Once they spent
money on it, they sort of have to like it, or else admit they were
foolish.
|
|
Posted by SteveB on October 18, 2009, 10:35 pm
wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> Sum Guy wrote:
> > Are the Dyson vacuum cleaners as good as they say they are?
> > Are they worthy of the tv-commercial air time? Or is this a case of "if
> > you advertize it, they will buy" ?
> They are just trying to justify a high price. Some people will buy
> something just because it costs more.
Curious that you have such a strong opinion on something you don't
own. Virtually all of the reviews from people that actually bought it
are 4 and 5 stars (Dyson Animal). Google has a review consolidator -
click on the "all reviews" link.
reply: I don't own any Oakley glasses. I think anyone who would pay $200
to $300 for a pair of sunglasses needs to be confined and observed for a
week. The same goes for vacuum cleaners. I've had $5 garage sale vacuums
that did as good as a new one, and if they died, hell, just go get another
one.
Rhinestone shades (@$200 a pair) or cheap sunglasses, as some prophet once
said.
Steve
|
|
Posted by RicodJour on October 19, 2009, 12:03 am
show/hide quoted text
> reply: =A0I don't own any Oakley glasses. =A0I think anyone who would pay=
$200
show/hide quoted text
> to $300 for a pair of sunglasses needs to be confined and observed for a
> week. =A0The same goes for vacuum cleaners. =A0I've had $5 garage sale va=
cuums
show/hide quoted text
> that did as good as a new one, and if they died, hell, just go get anothe=
> one.
Opinions vary.
show/hide quoted text
> Rhinestone shades (@$200 a pair) or cheap sunglasses, as some prophet onc=
> said.
You're bitching about two or three bills for sunglasses? Sheesh. You
really are out of the loop.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/on-show-interbike-2009-part-17
|
|
Posted by SteveB on October 19, 2009, 11:20 am
show/hide quoted text
> reply: I don't own any Oakley glasses. I think anyone who would pay $200
> to $300 for a pair of sunglasses needs to be confined and observed for a
> week. The same goes for vacuum cleaners. I've had $5 garage sale vacuums
> that did as good as a new one, and if they died, hell, just go get another
> one.
Opinions vary.
show/hide quoted text
> Rhinestone shades (@$200 a pair) or cheap sunglasses, as some prophet once
> said.
You're bitching about two or three bills for sunglasses? Sheesh. You
really are out of the loop.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/on-show-interbike-2009-part-17
Yeah, they don't carry those at the Dollar Store.
|
|
Posted by Joe on October 17, 2009, 11:10 am
Forget the dyson, get the purple kenmore, go out to a *really* nice dinner
for the price difference.
http://www.sears.com/shc/s/ProductDisplay?partNumber=02036933000P&storeId=10153&sName=Upright&psid=Amazon&vName=Appliances&cName=Vacuums&catalogId=12605&sid=IDx20090505x00001a
no affiliation, just happy with the vac. It really sucks (just had to throw
that in there)
show/hide quoted text
> Are the Dyson vacuum cleaners as good as they say they are?
> Are they worthy of the tv-commercial air time? Or is this a case of "if
> you advertize it, they will buy" ?
|
Page 6 of 12 < 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | dyson vacuum cleaners | April 17, 2006, 8:13 pm |
| vacuum cleaners.... I've gone through 3 eurekas already ! | February 12, 2005, 6:29 am |
| Bagless Vacuum Cleaners | August 13, 2006, 12:35 pm |
| Vacuum Cleaners Galore!!! | August 30, 2007, 2:40 am |
| great vacuum cleaners | October 21, 2007, 7:05 am |
| Best vacuum cleaner (one that doesnt have plastic agitator housing)? Dc17 dyson worth it? | January 16, 2010, 11:11 pm |
| Industrial vacuum cleaners stolen | January 16, 2009, 11:00 am |
| Any household vacuum cleaners manufactured in a democracy? | December 22, 2008, 6:36 pm |
| Carpet Cleaning News,Rug Care,Vacuum Cleaners (Marry Christmas!!!) | December 25, 2005, 8:10 am |
| Home Depot won't price match Milwaukee electric chain saw - where a great deal is not a deal at all. | June 26, 2008, 9:58 am |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>> Sum Guy wrote:
>> > Are the Dyson vacuum cleaners as good as they say they are?
>> > Are they worthy of the tv-commercial air time? Or is this a case of "if
>> > you advertize it, they will buy" ?
>> They are just trying to justify a high price. Some people will buy
>> something just because it costs more.
>Curious that you have such a strong opinion on something you don't
>own. Virtually all of the reviews from people that actually bought it
>are 4 and 5 stars (Dyson Animal). Google has a review consolidator -
>click on the "all reviews" link.
>R