|
Posted by Pete C. on April 28, 2008, 5:00 pm
SteveB wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:43:24 GMT, Mitch@_._ wrote:
> >
> >
> >>So I'm paranoid. I'm going to go get a new CO detector.
> >
> > Came home with a new detector. No alrams.
> > But I'm curious, what are sources of CO in a home?
>
> Hope you didn't screw up already. Did you buy one with the digital display
> or not?
>
> Lets say the threshold limit is 400 parts per million, or whatever it is for
> CO.
>
> Lets say you have a concentration of 389ppm. It's not going to alert. But
> wouldn't you want to know if there was ANY CO around so you could find the
> source before it got to bad levels. That's the problems with most of those
> detectors. They usually go off after you're passed out. Even the properly
> working ones with digital readouts will give you readings from traffic, a
> car entering or leaving your garage, a wood stove that's perfectly vented,
> and other things. But you do want to know what the level is before it
> reaches the critical stage.
>
> Steve
You're not entirely correct. A CO detector with a digital display is
preferable for tracking intermittent sources and general peace of mind.
It is not true however that a detector is not going to alert for a CO
reading slightly under a threshold. CO detectors use a time weighted
alarm model and will alarm very fast for really high levels and with
more of a delay for lower levels. The threshold where they really won't
alarm at all is very low. The paperwork that comes with the detectors
generally lists the threshold levels and times, or you can find it on
the manufacturers sites.
|