|
Posted by JoeSpareBedroom on May 7, 2008, 10:02 am
Of course, but that knowledge was discovered to be nonsense. Let's stay
focused on the real subject at hand. What would need to happen in order for
you to believe research about the harmful effects of a product like Roundup?
You're a scientific guy. I'm sure you can answer the question.
> they used to use leeches and have 'blood lettings' at the barber shop. Do
> you think that "knowledge" expired?
>
> s
>
>
>> You used the number 4 in your sentence. Does knowledge have an expiration
>> date? In other words, if something is discovered today, and all
>> scientists agree it's a valid discovery, does the discovery become
>> invalid after a certain period of time, like the way milk goes bad?
>>
>> Please define that period of time.
>>
>> You said "4".
>>
>> And by the way, the studies are correct. Who would need to publish the
>> exact same data in order for you to believe it? Name one organization,
>> agency or news source you would believe.
>>
>>
>>> thanks, now what does a 4 year old propaganda sheet from a left wing
>>> tree hugger group have to do with it?
>>>
>>>
>>> s
>>>
>>>
>>>> Enjoy:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pesticide.org/glyphosate.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
|