|
Posted by FatChance on June 13, 2008, 12:50 pm
DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Just from a practical standpoint, unless the exhaust fan is located on
>>> an exterior wall, it is easier to vent the fan if it is in the
>>> ceiling. Mounting the fan in an interior wall presents the problem of
>>> running the duct, presumably 3"-6", through the top plate of the
>>> wall. A ceiling mount allows you to duct to the outside via attic, or
>>> the space between joists.
>>>> Why are bathroom exhaust fans mounted in the ceiling?
>>>> Wouldn't down low next to the toilet be a better location?
>>>> Maybe even lower than the toilet and behind the toilet. Then the "smell"
>>>> would go down and back instead of forward and up!- Hide quoted text -
>>> - Show quoted text -
>> re: Mounting the fan in an interior wall presents the problem of
>> running the duct, presumably 3"-6", through the top plate of the wall.
>>
>> Through the top plate?How wide are your wallsthat you could run a 3"
>> - 6" duct *through* the top plate?
>>
>> I think that kind of implies what the problem is -----
>>
>> If you try to run the duct up inside the wall and "through" the top plate
>> you effectively destroy the top plate?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> I read the problem to be that it would be *harder* to run the vent
> through the top plate than to simply run it into the attic through the
> ceiling, like it would be harder to run a wire through the top plate
> than to run it through the ceiling.
>
> I don't consider a complete severing of the top plate to be "through
> it".
>
> I believe "through" implies that there is some material left
> surrounding the hole.
The reason the fan is there or required is for moisture not smells.
It's called a "fart fan" as a joke. The moisture occurs from
shower/bathing and usually rises because of the warmth. The codes
usually specify a certain amount of "air changes" per hour for an
exhaust fan.
--
|