|
Posted by Tony Hwang on February 6, 2007, 8:48 pm
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>
>>The old deck was Cedar. When we get the insurance payment I was
>>thinking of going PT because it is cheaper and we could build a bigger
>>deck for the same price. Composite decking is out of our price range.
>
>
> Only advantage of PT is cost. Cedar would look much better, IMO, but bigger
> is better too. Depends on your priorities.
>
>
Hi,
Also concern for chemical bleeding out. Specially if little kids are
around. All my decks are cedar under cover(roof)
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap