If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by Art on June 18, 2007, 6:01 pm
There have been lots of posts about how crappy the Kenmore 70 pint
dehumidifiers have turned out to be. Mine broke every year for the 3 years
I kept it and even though the refrigeration system had 2 more years left on
its warranty I decided I was tired of carrying it back to sears repair dept
and this time, after it broke, I bought a Whirlpool. So far so good. Some
people complain that the Whirlpool is noisy but I believe it is about the
same noise level as the Kenmore. Another complaint is connecting a drainage
hose. I agree that they did not leave much clearance for the attachment but
I was able to attach a hose without problems. Now the bad news is I just
read that Whirlpool is closing their dehumidifier factory (newspaper
article). So if you are considering one you might want to grab it because
they may be moving production off shore.
|
|
Posted by nicksanspam on June 19, 2007, 6:01 am
show/hide quoted text
>There have been lots of posts about how crappy the Kenmore 70 pint
>dehumidifiers have turned out to be. Mine broke every year for
>the 3 years I kept it...
And they use lots of electrical energy. A Smart Vent (40 watts max)
would probably last longer. It has an electronic circuit that turns
on 2 small fans whenever the dew point of outdoor air is less than
the dew point of indoor air, ie the absolute humidity of the outdoor
air is lower. The Zomeworks H2 ventilator for battery boxes seems
to do the same thing, something like this, viewed in a fixed font:
outdoors up indoors
---------------
<-- moist air
----------------------
show/hide quoted text
| --> dry air
| -------------------
| |
| | ---------------
| | heat exchanger
| |
| | down
| |
| | dip tube
as described in Steve Baer's ASES 2004 Humidity Chimneys paper. Moist air
is less dense than dry air, at the same temperature (hence the heat
exchanger.) Steve says a 1% moisture difference with a 2.5 foot height
difference (hence the dip tube) can make 75 feet per minute of air flow,
so a 6" pipe with an 8' height might make Pi(3/12)^2sqrt(8/2.5)75 = 26 cfm
flow and remove about 26x60x0.075x0.01x24h = 28 pints per day of water
from a basement, in dry weather, with a concentric pipe heat exchange
chimney inside the house, from the first floor ceiling to the basement.
The external "dip tube" might be a box with a transparent south side
and 150 Tyvek bags filled with desiccant clay, which can absorb 28%
of their weight in water, ie 53 pints:
http://www.uline.com/ProductDetail.asp?model=S-1606&ref=1006 The Florida Solar Energy Center puts clay bags on wire racks in an attic
with a tin roof which heats up and dries them out during the day. After
they cool, at night, they remove moisture from house air that circulates
up through the attic. Here's some Desi-Pak (tm) tech info:
http://www.agmcontainer.com/desiccantcity/pdfs/Desiccant%20performance.pdf Graph 4 shows Desi-Paks can absorb 12% of their weight in 10 hours
at 30C and 60% RH, ie 2.3 pints per hour for the 189 pound collection
above. This rises with more airflow or thinner bags. Graph 3 says
they can absorb 8% in 100 hours at 25C and 10% RH, ie 0.15 pints
per hour for 189 pounds.
Nick
|
|
Posted by carneyke on June 19, 2007, 8:11 pm
I have a Sears dehumifier that is 20 years old, it had the fan go once
($100 fan). The problem I see with drawing hot dry air from an attic
is, it would make the basement hot. I enjoy my cool / semi dry
basement because of the dehumifier. I can't see desicant doing the job
a dehumifier does..... It may work but I doubt it would be an easy
install.
On Jun 19, 6:01 am, nicksans...@ece.villanova.edu wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> >There have been lots of posts about how crappy the Kenmore 70 pint
> >dehumidifiers have turned out to be. Mine broke every year for
> >the 3 years I kept it...
> And they use lots of electrical energy. A Smart Vent (40 watts max)
> would probably last longer. It has an electronic circuit that turns
> on 2 small fans whenever the dew point of outdoor air is less than
> the dew point of indoor air, ie the absolute humidity of the outdoor
> air is lower. The Zomeworks H2 ventilator for battery boxes seems
> to do the same thing, something like this, viewed in a fixed font:
> outdoors up indoors
> ---------------
> <-- moist air
> ----------------------
> | --> dry air
> | -------------------
> | |
> | | ---------------
> | | heat exchanger
> | |
> | | down
> | |
> | | dip tube
> as described in Steve Baer's ASES 2004 Humidity Chimneys paper. Moist air
> is less dense than dry air, at the same temperature (hence the heat
> exchanger.) Steve says a 1% moisture difference with a 2.5 foot height
> difference (hence the dip tube) can make 75 feet per minute of air flow,
> so a 6" pipe with an 8' height might make Pi(3/12)^2sqrt(8/2.5)75 = 26 cfm
> flow and remove about 26x60x0.075x0.01x24h = 28 pints per day of water
> from a basement, in dry weather, with a concentric pipe heat exchange
> chimney inside the house, from the first floor ceiling to the basement.
> The external "dip tube" might be a box with a transparent south side
> and 150 Tyvek bags filled with desiccant clay, which can absorb 28%
> of their weight in water, ie 53 pints:
> http://www.uline.com/ProductDetail.asp?model=S-1606&ref=1006
> The Florida Solar Energy Center puts clay bags on wire racks in an attic
> with a tin roof which heats up and dries them out during the day. After
> they cool, at night, they remove moisture from house air that circulates
> up through the attic. Here's some Desi-Pak (tm) tech info:
> http://www.agmcontainer.com/desiccantcity/pdfs/Desiccant%20performanc...
> Graph 4 shows Desi-Paks can absorb 12% of their weight in 10 hours
> at 30C and 60% RH, ie 2.3 pints per hour for the 189 pound collection
> above. This rises with more airflow or thinner bags. Graph 3 says
> they can absorb 8% in 100 hours at 25C and 10% RH, ie 0.15 pints
> per hour for 189 pounds.
> Nick
|
|
Posted by Neon John on June 19, 2007, 9:19 pm
Nick has a "thing" for this gadget and is rehashing a "discussion" we had last
winter. He exaggerates the "badness" of dehumidifiers and IMO, exaggerates the
goodness of his pet gadget.
I've measured my mid-quality GE dehumidifier using the equipment and techniques
described here:
http://www.neon-john.com/Misc/Energy_Audit.htm Feel free to download and use my spreadsheet. Bottom line, measuring long term
from
11/04/06 to 04/23/07, my dehumidifier used 2.03 KWH per day or about 15 cents'
worth
of power at our rate. The watt-hour meter is still connected and come November,
I'll
have a year's worth of data. I suspect that Nick's gadget will operate in the
same
ballpark of energy consumption. Meanwhile, my basement is both cool AND
precisely
controlled to 50% humidity. Me and my fairly large library love it.
There are more efficient dehumidifers available but as I correctly anticipated,
the
savings would take a lifetime to make up the difference in costs of the machines.
John
show/hide quoted text
>I have a Sears dehumifier that is 20 years old, it had the fan go once
>($100 fan). The problem I see with drawing hot dry air from an attic
>is, it would make the basement hot. I enjoy my cool / semi dry
>basement because of the dehumifier. I can't see desicant doing the job
>a dehumifier does..... It may work but I doubt it would be an easy
>install.
>On Jun 19, 6:01 am, nicksans...@ece.villanova.edu wrote:
>> >There have been lots of posts about how crappy the Kenmore 70 pint
>> >dehumidifiers have turned out to be. Mine broke every year for
>> >the 3 years I kept it...
>> And they use lots of electrical energy. A Smart Vent (40 watts max)
>> would probably last longer. It has an electronic circuit that turns
>> on 2 small fans whenever the dew point of outdoor air is less than
>> the dew point of indoor air, ie the absolute humidity of the outdoor
>> air is lower. The Zomeworks H2 ventilator for battery boxes seems
>> to do the same thing, something like this, viewed in a fixed font:
>> outdoors up indoors
>> ---------------
>> <-- moist air
>> ----------------------
>> | --> dry air
>> | -------------------
>> | |
>> | | ---------------
>> | | heat exchanger
>> | |
>> | | down
>> | |
>> | | dip tube
>> as described in Steve Baer's ASES 2004 Humidity Chimneys paper. Moist air
>> is less dense than dry air, at the same temperature (hence the heat
>> exchanger.) Steve says a 1% moisture difference with a 2.5 foot height
>> difference (hence the dip tube) can make 75 feet per minute of air flow,
>> so a 6" pipe with an 8' height might make Pi(3/12)^2sqrt(8/2.5)75 = 26 cfm
>> flow and remove about 26x60x0.075x0.01x24h = 28 pints per day of water
>> from a basement, in dry weather, with a concentric pipe heat exchange
>> chimney inside the house, from the first floor ceiling to the basement.
>> The external "dip tube" might be a box with a transparent south side
>> and 150 Tyvek bags filled with desiccant clay, which can absorb 28%
>> of their weight in water, ie 53 pints:
>> http://www.uline.com/ProductDetail.asp?model=S-1606&ref=1006
>> The Florida Solar Energy Center puts clay bags on wire racks in an attic
>> with a tin roof which heats up and dries them out during the day. After
>> they cool, at night, they remove moisture from house air that circulates
>> up through the attic. Here's some Desi-Pak (tm) tech info:
>> http://www.agmcontainer.com/desiccantcity/pdfs/Desiccant%20performanc...
>> Graph 4 shows Desi-Paks can absorb 12% of their weight in 10 hours
>> at 30C and 60% RH, ie 2.3 pints per hour for the 189 pound collection
>> above. This rises with more airflow or thinner bags. Graph 3 says
>> they can absorb 8% in 100 hours at 25C and 10% RH, ie 0.15 pints
>> per hour for 189 pounds.
>> Nick
John De Armond
See my website for my current email address
http://www.neon-john.com http://www.johndearmond.com <-- best little blog on the net!
Cleveland, Occupied TN
Remember, amateurs made the Ark, professionals made the Titanic.
|
|
Posted by Proctologically Violated©® on June 19, 2007, 9:48 pm
Are you all distinguishing between an indoor dehumidifier and an A/C?
An indoor dehumidifier provides *net heat* to the space while dehumidifying,
and an A/C cools, while providing the same (I think)dehumidification.
I use both in my shop.
Summer: A crappy Amana portable A/C, venting out of a hole in the wall,
about 850 watts, and
Winter: a brandX dehumidifier from Sam's/Costco, about 600 watts.
Both produce prodigious amounts of water--the Amana, about 7,000 btu at a
miserable 8.5 EER, cranks out about 5 gals/day, moderately humid weather.
I wonder if a 40 W system could do that.
An indoor dehumidifier is basically window A/C brought inside, and rigged in
such a way that it doesn't freeze up. I've tried a regular window A/C as an
indoor dehumidifer, and it worked, but froze.
Also, A/C's cycle on temp, dehumidifiers cycle on, well, humidity. I have a
broke dehumidifier, and I'm thinking of scavenging the humidity sensor and
wiring it to the A/C--if that makes sense.
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY
Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!
entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs
show/hide quoted text
> Nick has a "thing" for this gadget and is rehashing a "discussion" we had
> last
> winter. He exaggerates the "badness" of dehumidifiers and IMO,
> exaggerates the
> goodness of his pet gadget.
> I've measured my mid-quality GE dehumidifier using the equipment and
> techniques
> described here:
> http://www.neon-john.com/Misc/Energy_Audit.htm
> Feel free to download and use my spreadsheet. Bottom line, measuring long
> term from
> 11/04/06 to 04/23/07, my dehumidifier used 2.03 KWH per day or about 15
> cents' worth
> of power at our rate. The watt-hour meter is still connected and come
> November, I'll
> have a year's worth of data. I suspect that Nick's gadget will operate in
> the same
> ballpark of energy consumption. Meanwhile, my basement is both cool AND
> precisely
> controlled to 50% humidity. Me and my fairly large library love it.
> There are more efficient dehumidifers available but as I correctly
> anticipated, the
> savings would take a lifetime to make up the difference in costs of the
> machines.
> John
> wrote:
>>I have a Sears dehumifier that is 20 years old, it had the fan go once
>>($100 fan). The problem I see with drawing hot dry air from an attic
>>is, it would make the basement hot. I enjoy my cool / semi dry
>>basement because of the dehumifier. I can't see desicant doing the job
>>a dehumifier does..... It may work but I doubt it would be an easy
>>install.
>>On Jun 19, 6:01 am, nicksans...@ece.villanova.edu wrote:
>>> >There have been lots of posts about how crappy the Kenmore 70 pint
>>> >dehumidifiers have turned out to be. Mine broke every year for
>>> >the 3 years I kept it...
>>> And they use lots of electrical energy. A Smart Vent (40 watts max)
>>> would probably last longer. It has an electronic circuit that turns
>>> on 2 small fans whenever the dew point of outdoor air is less than
>>> the dew point of indoor air, ie the absolute humidity of the outdoor
>>> air is lower. The Zomeworks H2 ventilator for battery boxes seems
>>> to do the same thing, something like this, viewed in a fixed font:
>>> outdoors up indoors
>>> ---------------
>>> <-- moist air
>>> ----------------------
>>> | --> dry air
>>> | -------------------
>>> | |
>>> | | ---------------
>>> | | heat exchanger
>>> | |
>>> | | down
>>> | |
>>> | | dip tube
>>> as described in Steve Baer's ASES 2004 Humidity Chimneys paper. Moist
>>> air
>>> is less dense than dry air, at the same temperature (hence the heat
>>> exchanger.) Steve says a 1% moisture difference with a 2.5 foot height
>>> difference (hence the dip tube) can make 75 feet per minute of air flow,
>>> so a 6" pipe with an 8' height might make Pi(3/12)^2sqrt(8/2.5)75 = 26
>>> cfm
>>> flow and remove about 26x60x0.075x0.01x24h = 28 pints per day of water
>>> from a basement, in dry weather, with a concentric pipe heat exchange
>>> chimney inside the house, from the first floor ceiling to the basement.
>>> The external "dip tube" might be a box with a transparent south side
>>> and 150 Tyvek bags filled with desiccant clay, which can absorb 28%
>>> of their weight in water, ie 53 pints:
>>> http://www.uline.com/ProductDetail.asp?model=S-1606&ref=1006
>>> The Florida Solar Energy Center puts clay bags on wire racks in an attic
>>> with a tin roof which heats up and dries them out during the day. After
>>> they cool, at night, they remove moisture from house air that circulates
>>> up through the attic. Here's some Desi-Pak (tm) tech info:
>>> http://www.agmcontainer.com/desiccantcity/pdfs/Desiccant%20performanc...
>>> Graph 4 shows Desi-Paks can absorb 12% of their weight in 10 hours
>>> at 30C and 60% RH, ie 2.3 pints per hour for the 189 pound collection
>>> above. This rises with more airflow or thinner bags. Graph 3 says
>>> they can absorb 8% in 100 hours at 25C and 10% RH, ie 0.15 pints
>>> per hour for 189 pounds.
>>> Nick
> --
> John De Armond
> See my website for my current email address
> http://www.neon-john.com
> http://www.johndearmond.com <-- best little blog on the net!
> Cleveland, Occupied TN
> Remember, amateurs made the Ark, professionals made the Titanic.
>
|
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | dehumidifiers | July 20, 2005, 2:06 am |
| dehumidifiers | February 29, 2008, 10:58 pm |
| A few questions about DEHUMIDIFIERS... ??? | July 12, 2006, 8:09 am |
| Dehumidifiers: Which one is Decent? | March 25, 2007, 6:02 pm |
| dehumidifiers revisited | April 16, 2009, 7:03 pm |
| Stupid question on dehumidifiers | November 5, 2006, 10:33 am |
| Low power consumption dehumidifiers $ave ? | September 8, 2008, 9:18 am |
| LG/Goldstar/Kenmoore/Friedrich Dehumidifiers | June 30, 2005, 1:36 pm |
|
|
>dehumidifiers have turned out to be. Mine broke every year for
>the 3 years I kept it...