|
Posted by Big_Jake on July 6, 2009, 11:55 pm
On Jul 3, 7:52=A0am, not_va...@noemail.address (ray pierce) wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 04:19:19 -0700 (PDT), Big_Jake
> >I have the Seesnake with the 17 mm head, and it works pretty well. =A0It
> >is often hard to tell "which way is up" but the more expensive
> >Seesnake is just too pricey.
> >I know that mine won't go through a toilet's trapway, and I don't
> >think that the smaller head will either, but I know that isn't
> >"exactly" what you said in your post.
> Going thru a toilet trap was exactly what I had in mind. =A0A camera
> could confirm q-tips, tin can lids and lodged toys before pulling the
> toilet.
> Why won't yours go thru the trap??
Not enough flexibility. You can't bend the "arm" into a tight enough
radius to go through the trap.
BTW, I pulled a hotel sized shampoo bottle and a jelly jar lid out of
a toilet last weekend.
JK
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>is often hard to tell "which way is up" but the more expensive
>Seesnake is just too pricey.
>I know that mine won't go through a toilet's trapway, and I don't
>think that the smaller head will either, but I know that isn't
>"exactly" what you said in your post.