|
Posted by hallerb@aol.com on April 13, 2008, 6:10 pm
> I have excellent experiences with Toto "Drake" toilets. Keep in mind that
> most models of toilets are available in round or elongated versions. If a
> male is going to be using it, they will appreciate the elongated versions =
as
> round ones are usually so short that parts of the male anatomy will come i=
n
> contact with the interior porcelain surface, which is both uncomfortable a=
nd
> unsanitary.
>
$Ph4.55@newsfe02.lga...
>
>
>
> > On 04/13/08 03:41 pm toecheese wrote:
>
> >> I need to replace the toilet in an upstairs, second story bathroom. =EF=
=BF=BDI'd
> >> like to get a low-flow tank to save water but I don't want to end up wi=
th
> >> one that won't have enough water pressure to properly flush without
> >> clogging all the time. =EF=BF=BDIs there any kind of minimum gallons pe=
r flush or
> >> anything else like that I should be looking for?
>
> > AFAIK, 1.6 gall per flush is the max. available now, and I think I've se=
en
> > some that are 1.4 gall per flush.
>
> > I think there are also dual-flush models that will use less than 1.6 (or=
> > 1.4) galls for liquid-only flushing.
>
> > Our American Standard "Champion" toilets (1.6 gall) are fine and have
> > never had to be flushed more than once. There may be cheaper ones that
> > work as well.
>
> > Perce- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
avoid the power flush models at all costs unless you live alone.
they sound like a jet engine on takeoff.......
we replaced our water waster years ago and i regret that a lot.
lets just say that my output can be large diameter and hard at times,
whicjh clogs toilet......
the old water piggie had no trouble in all those years.
one day i will go to canada and bring back a regular water waster,
they are still sold in canada, and can be bought on e bay
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap