If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by autonut843 on December 14, 2005, 2:15 pm
Hi,
I have noticed in newer homes that they have smoke detectors that take
both a battery and are plugged in to the AC. I think the wires running
between them seem to have an additional conductor and if one smoke
detector goes off and starts beeping, shortly thereafter, the other
ones start beeping as well. How does this work? If you were to mix
and match between different smoke detector vendors (all having the
interconnect feature, of course), would they all work the same? Is
this an industry standard connection? I assume it is an additional
conductor that either gets shorted to ground or hot by the tripped
smoke detector and when the other ones detect that short to ground/hot,
they start beeping as well.
Does any company make something that could tap in to that extra wire so
that, say, if I wanted to turn on emergency lighting or something like
that, it could trip a relay to do that? I'm thinking something that
wires in like a door bell transformer where the line voltage AC is all
in the box and the relay contact screws are outside where they belong,
not sharing a box with the line voltage at all.
Of course, if company XYZcorp makes an "interconnect smoke detector
relay module" that is UL etc approved and can be legally connected to
the smoke detector wiring harness in a standard single gang box and
will trip a NO/NC relay when the detectors are beeping, I'd like to
know about that.
Since IMO, smoke detectors are life safety, I'm not thinking about
modifying anything or experimenting on my own. It is more just a
curiosity on how the thing works and if there is an industry standard
or not. I am sure some of you have modified smoke detectors to do
something like this, but I would prefer if these mods were kept out of
this thread since I think there are many that feel this is no problem
and there are many that feel that modifying a smoke detector is a
dangerous thing to do. I, personally, would rather not be lead away in
handcuffs after explaining to the fire investigator the cool mod I did
to my smoke detectors that caused them not to work when I needed them
most and, golly, I don't see why it didn't work right, should I get a
lawyer now? the circuit really should have worked....
Thanks
|
|
Posted by Ken on December 14, 2005, 3:28 pm
autonut843 wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> Hi,
> I have noticed in newer homes that they have smoke detectors that take
> both a battery and are plugged in to the AC. I think the wires running
> between them seem to have an additional conductor and if one smoke
> detector goes off and starts beeping, shortly thereafter, the other
> ones start beeping as well. How does this work? If you were to mix
> and match between different smoke detector vendors (all having the
> interconnect feature, of course), would they all work the same? Is
> this an industry standard connection? I assume it is an additional
> conductor that either gets shorted to ground or hot by the tripped
> smoke detector and when the other ones detect that short to ground/hot,
> they start beeping as well.
> Does any company make something that could tap in to that extra wire so
> that, say, if I wanted to turn on emergency lighting or something like
> that, it could trip a relay to do that? I'm thinking something that
> wires in like a door bell transformer where the line voltage AC is all
> in the box and the relay contact screws are outside where they belong,
> not sharing a box with the line voltage at all.
> Of course, if company XYZcorp makes an "interconnect smoke detector
> relay module" that is UL etc approved and can be legally connected to
> the smoke detector wiring harness in a standard single gang box and
> will trip a NO/NC relay when the detectors are beeping, I'd like to
> know about that.
> Since IMO, smoke detectors are life safety, I'm not thinking about
> modifying anything or experimenting on my own. It is more just a
> curiosity on how the thing works and if there is an industry standard
> or not. I am sure some of you have modified smoke detectors to do
> something like this, but I would prefer if these mods were kept out of
> this thread since I think there are many that feel this is no problem
> and there are many that feel that modifying a smoke detector is a
> dangerous thing to do. I, personally, would rather not be lead away in
> handcuffs after explaining to the fire investigator the cool mod I did
> to my smoke detectors that caused them not to work when I needed them
> most and, golly, I don't see why it didn't work right, should I get a
> lawyer now? the circuit really should have worked....
> Thanks
You would think that they would make an industry standard for that sort
of thing, but unfortunately, not only is there no industry standard,
the interconnect specs are different between different smoke detector
models from the same manufacturer. There are low voltage
interconnects, and line voltage interconnects. And ther eare different
standards for the low voltage interconnects. I wired up 9 smoke alarms
with interconnects in our house, went and bought 1 hardwired detector
w/ battery backup for each floor of the house, and the remaining ones
were hardwired models without battery backup. (I figured that one
battery backup per floor was sufficient.) Well, after installing
everything and testing it, I discovered that the battery backup ones
will only remotely sound the other battery backup ones, and the
no-battery-backup ones will sound other no-battery-backup ones. After
reading the fine print buried in the instructions, it does in fact say
that you have to have the exact same model for the interconnect to
work. Oh well. I assume that there is some modulated signal that is
sent over the interconnect line as opposed to a simple high/low voltage
to signal the other units, although this is just speculation on my
part, and I've never tested it out. (I'd have to borrow an
oscilloscope from work if I wanted to try out that theory.)
Ken
|
|
Posted by RBM on December 14, 2005, 4:03 pm
There are relay modules made for smoke detectors. I used to have one
interrupt the power to my oil burner if the alarm went off. I would look at
the website of your particular smoke detector manufacturer
show/hide quoted text
> autonut843 wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have noticed in newer homes that they have smoke detectors that take
>> both a battery and are plugged in to the AC. I think the wires running
>> between them seem to have an additional conductor and if one smoke
>> detector goes off and starts beeping, shortly thereafter, the other
>> ones start beeping as well. How does this work? If you were to mix
>> and match between different smoke detector vendors (all having the
>> interconnect feature, of course), would they all work the same? Is
>> this an industry standard connection? I assume it is an additional
>> conductor that either gets shorted to ground or hot by the tripped
>> smoke detector and when the other ones detect that short to ground/hot,
>> they start beeping as well.
>> Does any company make something that could tap in to that extra wire so
>> that, say, if I wanted to turn on emergency lighting or something like
>> that, it could trip a relay to do that? I'm thinking something that
>> wires in like a door bell transformer where the line voltage AC is all
>> in the box and the relay contact screws are outside where they belong,
>> not sharing a box with the line voltage at all.
>> Of course, if company XYZcorp makes an "interconnect smoke detector
>> relay module" that is UL etc approved and can be legally connected to
>> the smoke detector wiring harness in a standard single gang box and
>> will trip a NO/NC relay when the detectors are beeping, I'd like to
>> know about that.
>> Since IMO, smoke detectors are life safety, I'm not thinking about
>> modifying anything or experimenting on my own. It is more just a
>> curiosity on how the thing works and if there is an industry standard
>> or not. I am sure some of you have modified smoke detectors to do
>> something like this, but I would prefer if these mods were kept out of
>> this thread since I think there are many that feel this is no problem
>> and there are many that feel that modifying a smoke detector is a
>> dangerous thing to do. I, personally, would rather not be lead away in
>> handcuffs after explaining to the fire investigator the cool mod I did
>> to my smoke detectors that caused them not to work when I needed them
>> most and, golly, I don't see why it didn't work right, should I get a
>> lawyer now? the circuit really should have worked....
>> Thanks
> You would think that they would make an industry standard for that sort
> of thing, but unfortunately, not only is there no industry standard,
> the interconnect specs are different between different smoke detector
> models from the same manufacturer. There are low voltage
> interconnects, and line voltage interconnects. And ther eare different
> standards for the low voltage interconnects. I wired up 9 smoke alarms
> with interconnects in our house, went and bought 1 hardwired detector
> w/ battery backup for each floor of the house, and the remaining ones
> were hardwired models without battery backup. (I figured that one
> battery backup per floor was sufficient.) Well, after installing
> everything and testing it, I discovered that the battery backup ones
> will only remotely sound the other battery backup ones, and the
> no-battery-backup ones will sound other no-battery-backup ones. After
> reading the fine print buried in the instructions, it does in fact say
> that you have to have the exact same model for the interconnect to
> work. Oh well. I assume that there is some modulated signal that is
> sent over the interconnect line as opposed to a simple high/low voltage
> to signal the other units, although this is just speculation on my
> part, and I've never tested it out. (I'd have to borrow an
> oscilloscope from work if I wanted to try out that theory.)
> Ken
>
|
|
Posted by SQLit on December 14, 2005, 5:32 pm
> Hi,
> I have noticed in newer homes that they have smoke detectors that take
> both a battery and are plugged in to the AC. I think the wires running
> between them seem to have an additional conductor and if one smoke
> detector goes off and starts beeping, shortly thereafter, the other
> ones start beeping as well. How does this work? If you were to mix
> and match between different smoke detector vendors (all having the
> interconnect feature, of course), would they all work the same? Is
> this an industry standard connection? I assume it is an additional
> conductor that either gets shorted to ground or hot by the tripped
> smoke detector and when the other ones detect that short to ground/hot,
> they start beeping as well.
> Does any company make something that could tap in to that extra wire so
> that, say, if I wanted to turn on emergency lighting or something like
> that, it could trip a relay to do that? I'm thinking something that
> wires in like a door bell transformer where the line voltage AC is all
> in the box and the relay contact screws are outside where they belong,
> not sharing a box with the line voltage at all.
> Of course, if company XYZcorp makes an "interconnect smoke detector
> relay module" that is UL etc approved and can be legally connected to
> the smoke detector wiring harness in a standard single gang box and
> will trip a NO/NC relay when the detectors are beeping, I'd like to
> know about that.
> Since IMO, smoke detectors are life safety, I'm not thinking about
> modifying anything or experimenting on my own. It is more just a
> curiosity on how the thing works and if there is an industry standard
> or not. I am sure some of you have modified smoke detectors to do
> something like this, but I would prefer if these mods were kept out of
> this thread since I think there are many that feel this is no problem
> and there are many that feel that modifying a smoke detector is a
> dangerous thing to do. I, personally, would rather not be lead away in
> handcuffs after explaining to the fire investigator the cool mod I did
> to my smoke detectors that caused them not to work when I needed them
> most and, golly, I don't see why it didn't work right, should I get a
> lawyer now? the circuit really should have worked....
> Thanks
What you want is available and in production. Just not on the low end
interconnected ones.
|
|
Posted by autonut843 on December 14, 2005, 5:53 pm
Once again, I should have Googled first and I would have found my
answer. The Firex manual for one of their interconnected smoke
detectors says...
show/hide quoted text
> This smoke alarm should be installed in accordance with the NFPA's Standard 72
(National Fire Protection Association,
show/hide quoted text
> Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269) and any local codes that apply.
> When interconnecting, use #18 AWG minimum solid or stranded wire. Maximum wire
length between any two is 1,500
show/hide quoted text
> feet for #18 AWG or 4,000 feet for #14 AWG (20 OHMS loop resistance).
> DO NOT connect to any other type or model of heat or smoke alarm. Connect
smoke or heat alarms to a single AC
show/hide quoted text
> branch circuit. If local codes do not permit, be sure the neutral wire is
common to both phases.
So, I think that explains why I haven't found a commercially available
relay module to do what I was looking for.
Does anybody have a good idea for a passive way to monitor if the smoke
detector is going off? I guess I'm thinking something like a sound
pressure level sensor or something like that. Obviously it wouldn't be
foolproof. Any other ideas?
|
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | wireless interconnected AC smoke detectors | June 30, 2007, 11:51 pm |
| wired/interconnected smoke detectors: any low voltage models? | September 19, 2007, 10:11 am |
| Kidde AC Powered Wireless Smoke Detectors )interconnected) ? | October 4, 2009, 10:17 am |
| Wired Smoke Detectors And GFCI Question ? | February 11, 2005, 10:45 am |
| smoke detector delay - interconnected | April 7, 2008, 2:42 pm |
| Smoke Detectors | February 10, 2005, 3:10 pm |
| Smoke detectors | October 24, 2009, 8:53 am |
| Cleaning smoke detectors? | March 3, 2006, 3:53 pm |
| replacing smoke detectors | June 19, 2006, 8:51 pm |
| Disposal of smoke and co2 detectors | May 6, 2007, 5:23 am |
|
|
> I have noticed in newer homes that they have smoke detectors that take
> both a battery and are plugged in to the AC. I think the wires running
> between them seem to have an additional conductor and if one smoke
> detector goes off and starts beeping, shortly thereafter, the other
> ones start beeping as well. How does this work? If you were to mix
> and match between different smoke detector vendors (all having the
> interconnect feature, of course), would they all work the same? Is
> this an industry standard connection? I assume it is an additional
> conductor that either gets shorted to ground or hot by the tripped
> smoke detector and when the other ones detect that short to ground/hot,
> they start beeping as well.
> Does any company make something that could tap in to that extra wire so
> that, say, if I wanted to turn on emergency lighting or something like
> that, it could trip a relay to do that? I'm thinking something that
> wires in like a door bell transformer where the line voltage AC is all
> in the box and the relay contact screws are outside where they belong,
> not sharing a box with the line voltage at all.
> Of course, if company XYZcorp makes an "interconnect smoke detector
> relay module" that is UL etc approved and can be legally connected to
> the smoke detector wiring harness in a standard single gang box and
> will trip a NO/NC relay when the detectors are beeping, I'd like to
> know about that.
> Since IMO, smoke detectors are life safety, I'm not thinking about
> modifying anything or experimenting on my own. It is more just a
> curiosity on how the thing works and if there is an industry standard
> or not. I am sure some of you have modified smoke detectors to do
> something like this, but I would prefer if these mods were kept out of
> this thread since I think there are many that feel this is no problem
> and there are many that feel that modifying a smoke detector is a
> dangerous thing to do. I, personally, would rather not be lead away in
> handcuffs after explaining to the fire investigator the cool mod I did
> to my smoke detectors that caused them not to work when I needed them
> most and, golly, I don't see why it didn't work right, should I get a
> lawyer now? the circuit really should have worked....
> Thanks