|
Posted by hallerb@aol.com on April 3, 2008, 8:39 pm
> dpb wrote:
> > bud-- wrote:
> > ...
>
> >> There is a list? Can you also determine if a breaker was made in the
> >> period FPE was falsifying information? Both would be useful.
>
> > At one time I did find reference to the affected parts, yes. =EF=BF=BDIt=
's been
> > long enough ago I don't recall where that was. =EF=BF=BDI believe I have=
a list
> > of particulars squirreled away somewhere--if I can put my hands on it,
> > I'll try to post what I have. =EF=BF=BDMy recollection is there is a par=
t no or
> > other identifying mark as well as the series numbers that are
> > identifiers but that is as stated--recollection.
>
> > Don't know about the panel issue--never seen any problem on any I have
> > nor have I ever had any significant issue w/ the fit of any in the
> > panels when the cover is in place.
>
> > --
>
> Gory details here:http://www.arson-codes.com/
> Click on Reports and Articles.
>
> There is also a gallery of photos of other (un-related) incidents.
> Click on Photo Library
>
> Also see:http://www.inspect-ny.com/fpe/fpepanel.htm
>
> Jim- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
oh no there just my over reaction FPE is perfectly safe:(
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap